

Red Hat OpenShift and Docker are leading platforms in the container orchestration and management category. While both have their strengths, OpenShift has an upper hand in large-scale enterprise implementations due to its robust integration, security features, and extensive capabilities.
Features: Red Hat OpenShift offers powerful container orchestration, automated scaling, self-healing capabilities, and strong CI/CD integration with Jenkins and S2I support. Docker is valued for portability, ease of use, and its intuitive Docker Swarm for simple orchestration, offering flexibility in application deployment.
Room for Improvement: OpenShift’s complexity and lack of comprehensive documentation present challenges for less experienced users. Docker could enhance its stability and provide more support documentation for advanced use cases. Both platforms are urged to refine specific areas despite their overall capabilities.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenShift excels in enterprise-grade deployments but has a steep learning curve and complex initial setup. Red Hat’s customer service, though robust, can be cumbersome. Docker provides cloud-friendly user-friendly deployment and benefits from strong community support.
Pricing and ROI: OpenShift’s comprehensive licensing aligning with enterprise needs is costly, yet justified by high ROI from its advanced features. Docker is budget-friendly, with low-cost options and scalable licensing that favors smaller or developing enterprises and its cost-effectiveness gains prominence with its open-source model.
I can do containerization and share it with every computer, making it work for everyone.
With OpenShift combined with IBM Cloud App integration, I can spin an integration server in a second as compared to traditional methods, which could take days or weeks.
Moving to OpenShift resulted in increased system stability and reduced downtime, which contributed to operational efficiency.
It is always advisable to get the bare minimum that you need, and then add more when necessary.
From what I gather, customer support is great; they are quick and always available to support or help.
Red Hat's technical support is responsive and effective.
Customer support is really good because so far in our case, we have always received a prompt response, and they have been really helpful to us.
I have been pretty happy in the past with getting support from Red Hat.
Previously, only one or two applications could run on a server, but now it can handle hundreds of applications, scaling up or down as needed.
A realistic metric I observe is that I can scale services from two to over 20 containers without code changes.
The on-demand provisioning of pods and auto-scaling, whether horizontal or vertical, is the best part.
OpenShift's horizontal pod scaling is more effective and efficient than that used in Kubernetes, making it a superior choice for scalability.
Red Hat OpenShift scales excellently, with a rating of ten out of ten.
Docker has been very stable in my environment, especially once best practices and proper organization were in place.
It provides better performance yet requires more resources compared to vanilla Kubernetes.
I've had my cluster running for over four years.
It performs well under load, providing the desired output.
Docker is a time-tested, proven solution with industry-wide applications.
Windows containers are heavier and slower than Linux containers.
In terms of communication between services, perhaps the configuration within networks between containers could be improved.
Learning OpenShift requires complex infrastructure, needing vCenter integration, more advanced answers, active directory, and more expensive hardware.
Red Hat OpenShift's biggest disadvantage is they do not provide any private cloud setup where we can host on our site using their services.
We should aim to include VMware-like capabilities to be competitive, especially considering cost factors.
Docker Desktop is free for individual developers and small teams, but a paid subscription is required for large enterprises.
I consider Docker's pricing to be affordable.
Initially, licensing was per CPU, with a memory cap, but the price has doubled, making it difficult to justify for clients with smaller compute needs.
The pricing for Red Hat OpenShift is considered quite high.
Red Hat can improve on the pricing part by making it more flexible and possibly on the lower side.
It allows the software to run on various machines without compatibility issues, saving a lot of time.
Good security capabilities are included as well, providing image scanning, non-root containers, and minimal base images that reduce the attack surface.
The most valuable feature is the simple containerization.
Because it was centrally managed in our company, many metrics that we had to write code for were available out of the box, including utilization, CPU utilization, memory, and similar metrics.
The concept of containers and scaling on demand is a feature I appreciate the most about Red Hat OpenShift.
A valuable feature of Red Hat OpenShift is its ability to handle increased loads by automatically adding nodes.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Docker | 4.6% |
| Red Hat OpenShift | 3.5% |
| Other | 91.9% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 22 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 35 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 17 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 43 |
Docker provides a robust containerization platform, enabling identical environments across machines. With features like portability, fast deployment, and minimal resource consumption, Docker supports development, facilitating multitier architectures and integrating seamlessly with Kubernetes.
Docker offers an advanced containerization solution that enhances application management through automation and security measures. By isolating environments and managing dependencies, Docker supports platforms for scalable application development. Its integration with orchestration tools like Kubernetes and independence from host operating systems enable developers to create lightweight applications effectively. Although known for its cost efficiency and flexibility, Docker could improve in areas such as stability, command-line usability, and Windows performance integration. Users also point out the need for enhanced documentation, simplified management tools, and better persistence storage options, along with stronger marketing and easier user adoption.
What important features does Docker provide?Industries leverage Docker for application packaging, deploying microservices, and CI/CD processes. It supports DevOps, enhances backend service management, and enables resource-efficient development environments. Docker's compatibility with tools such as Jenkins ensures seamless integration and orchestration in modern IT workflows.
Red Hat OpenShift offers a robust, scalable platform with strong security and automation, suitable for container orchestration, application deployment, and microservices architecture.
Designed to modernize applications by transitioning from legacy systems to cloud-native environments, Red Hat OpenShift provides powerful CI/CD integration and Kubernetes compatibility. Its security features, multi-cloud support, and source-to-image functionality enhance deployment flexibility. While the GUI offers user-friendly navigation, users benefit from its cloud-agnostic nature and efficient lifecycle management. However, improvements are needed in documentation, configuration complexity, and integration with third-party platforms. Pricing and high resource demands can also be challenging for wider adoption.
What are the key features of Red Hat OpenShift?Red Hat OpenShift is strategically implemented for diverse industries focusing on container orchestration and application modernization. Organizations leverage it for migrating applications to cloud-native environments and managing CI/CD pipelines. Its functionality facilitates efficient resource management and microservices architecture adoption, supporting enterprise-level DevOps practices. Users employ it across cloud and on-premises platforms to drive performance improvements.
We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.