Digital Safe vs Micro Focus Content Manager comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "The fees incurred are for the licensing and maintenance."
  • More Micro Focus Content Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which File Archiving solutions are best for your needs.
    655,994 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:We like how the solution allows us to have retention of records and workflows, as well as its fire plan.
    Top Answer:I would prefer not to address the frequency of our licensing requirements. The fees incurred are for the licensing and maintenance.
    Top Answer:The ease of use should be addressed. If one is skillful then this will not present a problem, but a person who is not will be forced to struggle. Mobility, as it relates to the ability to have access… more »
    Ranking
    10th
    out of 22 in File Archiving
    Views
    191
    Comparisons
    109
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    5th
    out of 22 in File Archiving
    Views
    2,088
    Comparisons
    1,015
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    477
    Rating
    7.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Micro Focus Digital Safe, Autonomy Zantaz, HPE Autonomy Zantaz, HPE Digital Safe
    HPE Records Manager, HPE Content Manager
    Learn More
    Overview
    Autonomy Zantaz is a highly scalable and flexible archiving platform that enables your organization to capture and preserve email messages, attachments, and files in a way that both optimizes storage and allows immediate access for discovery and review by courts, regulators, administrators, and end-users. Powered by IDOL, EAS automates the processing of enormous volumes of information, dynamically exposing the patterns, linkages and meaning within.

    Micro Focus Content Manager, formerly Records Manager, is a governance-based enterprise content management system designed to help government agencies, regulated industries and global organizations manage their business content from creation to disposal. Regardless of how you create and collaborate on your content, Content Manager gives you the ability to leverage accurate, contextual, and complete information throughout its lifecycle. Managing your content in this way helps you significantly improve services to your customers, business decisions and insight for future strategy.

    Offer
    Learn more about Digital Safe
    Learn more about Micro Focus Content Manager
    Sample Customers
    EDF, Morgan Stanley, RateCity, Missouri State Courts
    Missouri State Courts
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Government58%
    Healthcare Company8%
    Non Profit8%
    Non Tech Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Government26%
    Computer Software Company21%
    Comms Service Provider8%
    Non Profit5%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise33%
    Large Enterprise40%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise60%

    Digital Safe is ranked 10th in File Archiving while Micro Focus Content Manager is ranked 5th in File Archiving with 1 review. Digital Safe is rated 0.0, while Micro Focus Content Manager is rated 7.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Micro Focus Content Manager writes "A stable and scalable solution which offers good support and is easy to set up, but should have better ease of use". Digital Safe is most compared with Veritas Enterprise Vault, whereas Micro Focus Content Manager is most compared with SharePoint, IBM FileNet, OpenText Content Suite Platform, OpenText Documentum and Microsoft OneDrive.

    See our list of best File Archiving vendors.

    We monitor all File Archiving reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.