Digital.ai Agility vs OpenText AccuRev comparison

Digital.ai and OpenText are both solutions in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category. Digital.ai is ranked #14 with an average rating of 7.0, while OpenText is ranked #22. Digital.ai holds a 1.9% mindshare in ALM, compared to OpenText’s 0.1% mindshare. Additionally, 75% of Digital.ai users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Digital.ai Agility

Read 6 Digital.ai Agility reviews

1,102 Views
860 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

OpenText AccuRev

Read 8 OpenText AccuRev reviews

235 Views
235 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Digital.ai Agility

OpenText AccuRev

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

OpenText AccuRev and Digital.ai Agility compete in the software management domain. Digital.ai Agility appears to have the upper hand with superior features that justify its higher price point, while OpenText AccuRev offers competitive pricing and support.

Features: OpenText AccuRev provides advanced version control capabilities, enhanced team collaboration, and tools tailored for complex development environments. Digital.ai Agility offers agile project management with strategic planning, progress tracking, and comprehensive management tools.

Room for Improvement: OpenText AccuRev could benefit from modernizing its deployment model and expanding agile management tools and user interface enhancements. Digital.ai Agility could improve by offering more competitive pricing, simplifying version control integration, and expanding support for traditional deployment environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Digital.ai Agility is known for seamless cloud deployment and reliable customer service with quick setup. OpenText AccuRev's traditional deployment may be cumbersome for some, but it offers notably helpful customer service.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText AccuRev features cost-effective pricing, promising strong ROI for robust version control environments. Digital.ai Agility has a higher upfront cost but delivers significant ROI through enhanced productivity and efficiency for agile-focused teams.

To learn more, read our detailed Digital.ai Agility vs. OpenText AccuRev Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Digital.ai Agility vs. OpenText AccuRev

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Digital.ai Agility

Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

14th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Release Automation (13th), Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (9th), Value Stream Management Software (5th)

OpenText AccuRev

Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

22nd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category, the mindshare of Digital.ai Agility is 1.9%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText AccuRev is 0.1%, down from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

Featured Reviews

Debbie Brey

Technical Fellow at Boeing

A scalable, full-package solution with a tech support team that bends over backwards to help

There is room for improvement in getting the analytics portion of the solution more integrated with the rest of it. The feature I would like to see is already in their newer licensing structure, and that's the live integration between Agility, Jira and Azure DevOps. That's the piece that I think is really valuable.

Read full review

Sameh-Hablas

CEO - Director General & Founder Ai/ IT Expert - Digital Transformation at Al Danah Information Systems Solutions

Helps us with our compliance goals, native quality management systems and with the legacy systems in our organization

To improve the product, it needs some enhancement to the application's interface to be more user-friendly. The product has all the features that we need and we can depend upon it. My issue with the product is that it is not easy to use without a guide or a proper manual. That is my point. It is not very friendly to use. For example, we may need the application to be more friendly in other sorts of ways. If we have an integrated module that allows access to the features we want through one click, you do not need to make it two or three clicks on the screen. The interface can be better designed to easily provide access to the features you need. The feature I would like to see in the next release is just for it to be more friendly to use and to be like a smart application that intuits your movement through the application. It needs to be something that works smoothly and intelligent without any complicated navigation of screens.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"With some of the other tools, you have to buy 20 different plugins to get to the same capability that comes with the basic Agility capability."

"It allows my clients to have one central tool to manage their agile projects."

"For visualization capabilities, the automation capabilities make it possible to support the different personas. The features and capabilities are excellent and come with excellent support."

"It can generate reports showing a burndown chart, burnup chart, and the planned vs actual velocity."

"Agility is highly flexible. It can do much more than what our client is doing with it. They use it in a defined way. Some at that company have a much broader knowledge of agile and SAFe, but they're given applications and a mandated way to work. We had to work within their parameters and provide an accurate transition so the data would be mapped and pushed through."

"The product has all the features that we for application managementat a lower cost."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is taking snapshots while doing the execution of the test cases."

"The most valuable feature is the Business Process Testing feature, BPT, because it brings in the most revenue."

"The solution is 100% scalable. It's much more scalable than the customer's capacity for implementing it. We do plan to increase usage ourselves."

Cons

"Improve how to create and track releases. Currently, I have to create child projects."

"There is room for improvement in getting the analytics portion of the solution more integrated with the rest of it."

"The user interface can be improved by adding Save, Edit, Add, Cancel, and Return buttons to the popup windows that are displayed when you click on a child item."

"It was not supporting some plugins. We wanted to migrate data that we were already using."

"The machine learning features are a new capability but could be improved. This is being worked by Digital.ai currently. Multicolor simulation, specifically, could be improved."

"In my work as a contractor, it's always frustrating when a client has multiple software applications that don't talk to each other and they all perform the same function. That presents a huge challenge between their IT groups."

"In the next release, I would like to have a repository for the code which is embedded. Apart from that, it has everything I need."

"The pricing should be more competitive."

"What I'm missing from the solution is a repository for the code. Something like Git, for example. Some sort of depository for the code that is embedded."

"It is difficult to gain experience with the product because resources and documentation for learning are not available."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Comparing the pricing to other products, I think this solution is in the middle."

"You get what you pay for. Don't let your development teams dictate what the portfolio management team should use as the main tool."

"It is a lower cost than other top competetors."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

20%

Insurance Company

18%

Computer Software Company

10%

Transportation Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Digital.ai Agility?

It was not supporting some plugins. We wanted to migrate data that we were already using. The migration of data and getting it up and running from the legacy system took some time to get accustomed...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Digital.ai Agility?

We were explaining how to set up the project itself, which describes the main use cases for Digital.ai Agility. This includes how to set up the workflow and how to manage and build a Kanban. I want...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Digital.ai Agility?

Digital.ai Agility has a bigger reach because it has many good integration points. It can be a one-stop solution for different needs, eliminating the need to use multiple pieces of software. Howeve...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Jira vs Digital.ai Agility

Compared 46% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs Digital.ai Agility

Compared 13% of the time

Jira Align vs Digital.ai Agility

Compared 11% of the time

OpenText Deployment Automation vs Digital.ai Agility

Compared 7% of the time

JIRA Portfolio vs Digital.ai Agility

Compared 6% of the time

More Digital.ai Agility Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Digital.ai Agility

August 2025

Download Digital.ai Agility product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText AccuRev

August 2025

Download OpenText AccuRev product report

Also Known As

VersionOne Lifecycle, VersionOne, CollabNet VersionOne, Digital.ai Continuum

Micro Focus AccuRev, AccuRev

Overview

Enterprise business agility rests on agile planning that scales and has the flexibility needed to meet the needs of customers and the market. Digital.ai Agility enables organizations to scale up agile from the team level across the product portfolio, improve collaboration and efficiency, and deliver software that provides more value.

Digital.ai

Get the governance and compliance capabilities you need to manage complexity. OpenText AccuRev helps you implement modern development practices at enterprise scale.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Siemens Health Services (HS), Cerner Corporation, Aaron's, Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta, Kelley Blue Book, AOL, Axway, Tideworks, bwin Interactive Entertainment, AG, Intergraph, Eos Group, PeopleCube, Liquid Machines

Akcelerant, SDL, CSG, Avid Technology Inc., Azimuth Systems Inc, Drivecam, Endgame, f5 Networks, Follett Software, Hyland Software, Indanet, Kronos, McAfee

Buyer's Guide

Digital.ai Agility vs. OpenText AccuRev

July 2025

Free Report: Digital.ai Agility vs. OpenText AccuRev

Find out what your peers are saying about Digital.ai Agility vs. OpenText AccuRev and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Digital.ai Agility vs. OpenText AccuRev report.

See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.

We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.