Devo vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform comparison

Devo and Seceon are both solutions in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category. Devo is ranked #18 with an average rating of 8.3, while Seceon is ranked #44 with an average rating of 6.0. Devo holds a 1.2% mindshare in SIEM, compared to Seceon’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Devo users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Seceon users who would recommend it.

Devo

Read 26 Devo reviews

6,972 Views
3,835 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Seceon Open Threat Manageme...

Read 13 Seceon Open Threat Management Platform reviews

2,782 Views
2,726 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Devo

Seceon Open Threat Manageme...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Both Devo and Seceon Open Threat Management Platform offer robust solutions in threat management. Seceon seems to have the upper hand thanks to its automation, cost-effectiveness, and smooth deployment.

Features: Devo is praised for real-time data analytics, scalability, and advanced threat detection. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is commended for comprehensive threat management, ease of use, and automation capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Users suggest Devo enhance its integration capabilities, lower resource consumption, and improve user interface. Seceon users request better documentation, more frequent updates, and enhanced reporting tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Devo users find the deployment straightforward but note occasional support complexities. Seceon is known for smooth deployment and responsive customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Devo's setup costs are high but offer long-term ROI through enhanced security. Seceon provides a more cost-effective initial setup and strong ROI for comprehensive threat management features.

To learn more, read our detailed Devo vs. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Devo vs. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,099 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Devo

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

18th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Log Management (18th), IT Operations Analytics (7th), AIOps (13th)

Seceon Open Threat Manageme...

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

44th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category, the mindshare of Devo is 1.2%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is 0.8%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Devo	1.2%
Seceon Open Threat Management Platform	0.8%
Other	98.0%

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

Featured Reviews

Usama Khan

Team Lead SOC at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Advanced threat hunting has improved SOC visibility and now supports faster incident response

Devo can improve in how its connectors enhance integration with third-party tools. Devo's architecture works by having you deploy a relay server in the data center of the client side and Devo SIEM is basically on the AWS cloud. There are specific ports which are enabled on the relay server, which are 514 and 13000, 13151, 152. However, when we talk about databases and custom integrations, there are not default ports in the relay server. No default ports are defined. For JDBC drivers, the port number is 1433, but it is not in the relay server. You have to add it manually. For Oracle RDBMS, the port is 1521, and it is also not there by default. I would appreciate more third-party integrations including Fortinet and others. Machine learning models can also be improved. Playbooks in the SOAR can also be improved. Regarding playbooks for automation, we utilize playbooks for automation in SOAR for automated IOC blocking on a firewall, on a web application firewall, on DNS security, etc. The only option for us to run the playbook is to schedule the job for it. However, if I want to manually run the playbook, there is no option for doing so. This needs improvement.

Read full review

TamimKhan

Solution Architect at Tiger IT Bangladesh Limited

Customization options need improvement but valuable threat management features and reasonable pricing benefit service providers

We are a Managed Security Service Provider (MSSP), and we provide services to our customers Seceon Open Threat Management Platform offers valuable features such as XDR and EDR. I also find the SOC and SOAR features valuable. Log management is another key functionality of the product. There are…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"When we show the people who are in charge of getting funding that we saved this number of man-hours, which correlates to this number of dollars, they're more willing to fight to get that funding for the next fiscal year."

"But from a SaaS standpoint, if not best-in-breed, Devo is certainly in the top-two or top-three."

"The most powerful feature is the way the data is stored and extracted. The data is always stored in its original format and you can normalize the data after it has been stored."

"Devo helps us to unlock the full power of our data because they have more than 450 parsers, which means that we can ingest pretty much any type of log data."

"Overall, I have no issues with it and my guys love it."

"The features I find most valuable in Devo are that it works on unstructured data."

"More than anything, we have seen ROI in the amount of time saved during investigations."

"It centralizes security management within a business, functioning as a core system for a SOC."

More Devo pros

"The solution is very cost-effective compared to Splunk and LogRhythm."

"We only recently started using Seceon, so we aren't taking advantage of all its features yet. We have enabled some proactive alerts about utilization and bottlenecks from high traffic."

"The main thing is the value proposition. It is one of the most sophisticated yet affordable solutions that I've come across. It is also one of the easiest-to-manage yet comprehensive solutions for a SOC analyst. Its customizations are really good, and it has a lot of integrations. It is multi-tenant and very fast to onboard. Its stability is 100%. We've never had an outage with it. It doesn't require extensive hardware resources. Its level of support is also very good. They have a very responsive technical team."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is its artificial intelligence."

"The pricing of Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is very reasonable."

"The solution is stable."

"The algorithm used in Seceon OTM is clear and logical, categorizing events as needed. This helps us identify and respond to threats effectively."

"It offers a holistic approach with multiple solutions blended into one platform."

More Seceon Open Threat Management Platform pros

Cons

"My opinion on the solution's technical support is not as great as it could be because of the issues I have faced regarding the service management element."

"However, the incident and threat detection is not what we had hoped for."

"We only use the core functionality and one of the reasons for this is that their security operation center needs improvement."

"Some third-parties don't have specific API connectors built, so we had to work with Devo to get the logs and parse the data using custom parsers, rather than an out-of-the-box solution."

"The overall performance of extraction could be a lot faster, but that's a common problem in this space in general. Also, the stock or default alerting and detecting options could definitely be broader and more all-encompassing. The fact that they're not is why we had to write all our own alerts."

"Some basic reporting mechanisms have room for improvement. Customers can do analysis by building Activeboards, Devo’s name for interactive dashboards. This capability is quite nice, but it is not a reporting engine. Devo does provide mechanisms to allow third-party tools to query data via their API, which is great. However, a lot of folks like or want a reporting engine, per se, and Devo simply doesn't have that. This may or may not be by design."

"The cost is a little higher compared to other tools such as DataDog or Elasticsearch, so they could work on reducing costs."

"From our experience, the Devo agent needs some work. They built it on top of OS Query's open-source framework. It seems like it wasn't tuned properly to handle a large volume of Windows event logs. In our experience, there would definitely be some room for improvement. A lot of SIEMs on the market have their own agent infrastructure. I think Devo's working towards that, but I think that it needs some improvement as far as keeping up with high-volume environments."

More Devo cons

"It would be better if they offered global coverage."

"Seceon Open Threat Management Platform sells some add-ons as part of the whole suite but not individually. If they sold them individually, they could potentially attract more business."

"The product should improve the triggering rate."

"It would be ideal with the processing was more manageable. Not many customers are willing to have a dedicated server with two CPUs and one TB of memory. The cost of this is huge for a smaller organization."

"It would be ideal with the processing was more manageable."

"The dashboard has always been an issue."

"For small to medium-sized customers, Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is good. However, for large enterprises, it is not as effective."

"It is a standalone solution now. They need to make it into a cloud-based subscription model. It needs more compatibility for co-managed solutions. It can also have more threats and deeper integration with Microsoft."

More Seceon Open Threat Management Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's very competitive. That was also a primary draw for us. Some of the licensing models with solutions like Splunk and Sentinel were attractive upfront, but there were so many micro-charges and services we would've had to add on to make them what we wanted. We had to include things like SOAR and extended capabilities, whereas all those capabilities are completely included with the Devo platform. I haven't seen any additional fee."

"I like the pricing very much. They keep it simple. It is a single price based on data ingested, and they do it on an average. If you get a spike of data that flows in, they will not stick it to you or charge you for that. They are very fair about that."

"I rate the pricing a four on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

"Our licensing fees are billed annually and per terabyte."

"Devo was very cost-competitive... Devo did come with that 400 days of hot data, and that was not the case with other products."

"It's a per gigabyte cost for ingestion of data. For every gigabyte that you ingest, it's whatever you negotiated your price for. Compared to other contracts that we've had for cloud providers, it's significantly less."

"[Devo was] in the ballpark with at least a couple of the other front-runners that we were looking at. Devo is a good value and, given the quality of the product, I would expect to pay more."

"Devo is definitely cheaper than Splunk. There's no doubt about that. The value from Devo is good. It's definitely more valuable to me than QRadar or LogRhythm or any of the old, traditional SIEMs."

More Devo pricing and cost advice

"The pricing is very competitive. It's not expensive."

"I find Seceon OTM's pricing to be reasonable, not too high or low, just okay for the market standards. I can't disclose specific figures, we pay on a quarterly basis under a service model. I would rate it eight out of ten. As a customer, I always hope for better pricing options."

"The solution is cheap and very competitive. It offers good tuning in terms of the pricing. Other solutions like Palo Alto and IBM are more expensive."

"Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is cost-effective because it's a comprehensive platform that offers high availability."

"It has a per-asset model instead of an ingestion-based model, which gives predictable pricing. In terms of price, it is in the middle to lower range of SIEMs that it competes against. It is the most affordable solution that we have implemented so far. It was much more affordable than anything else I've implemented."

"The price is quite reasonable."

"We used the solution's trial version for two months and later purchased it."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,099 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Construction Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

12%

Outsourcing Company

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	12

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	1

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Devo?

The pricing of the product is reasonable if we compare it with other Gartner leading products like Splunk, LogRhythm, Microsoft Sentinel, Google SecOps. Its licensing model is basically on per-day ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Devo?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Devo?

I am using Devo myself. Basically, I work at an MSSP, and we provide services to the organization for Security Operation Centers. In our Security Operation Center, we provide the service of SIEM vi...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Seceon Open Threat Management Platform?

The pricing of Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is very reasonable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Seceon Open Threat Management Platform?

There are areas for improvement in the customization options. Every ( /products/every-reviews ) quarter, they are developing the platform with new updates based on feedback provided.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Seceon Open Threat Management Platform?

We are a Managed Security Service Provider (MSSP ( /categories/managed-security-services-providers-mssp )), and we provide services to our customers.

See all answers

Comparisons

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Devo

Compared 8% of the time

LogRhythm SIEM vs Devo

Compared 7% of the time

New Relic vs Devo

Compared 4% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs Devo

Compared 3% of the time

Microsoft Sentinel vs Devo

Compared 3% of the time

More Devo Competitors

Microsoft Sentinel vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

Compared 15% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

Compared 13% of the time

DNIF HYPERCLOUD vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

Compared 7% of the time

LogRhythm SIEM vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

Compared 5% of the time

More Seceon Open Threat Management Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Devo

August 2026

Download Devo product report

Buyer's Guide

Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

July 2026

Seceon Open Threat Management Platform report

Download Seceon Open Threat Management Platform product report

Also Known As

No data available

Seceon OTM, Seceon aiSIEM, aiSIEM, Seceon Open Threat Management

Overview

Devo offers powerful visual analytics, real-time data querying, and log integration capabilities within a cloud-native, multi-tenant architecture, supporting extended data retention ideal for long-term analysis and compliance.

Devo is recognized for its Activeboards, which facilitate visual analytics. High-speed search capabilities and real-time analytics enable efficient data manipulation and querying. Its multi-tenant architecture supports effective data segregation and customization tailored to distinct business needs, enhancing its value for handling complex log integrations. With extended data retention of 400 days and a cloud-native architecture, Devo is a robust platform for long-term analysis and compliance requirements. Though opportunities exist to improve browser stability on large searches, SOAR integrations, and its parser capabilities, Devo remains essential for incident response and security monitoring, offering centralized data storage and analysis.

What are Devo's most important features?

Activeboards: Facilitate visual analytics and data exploration.
High-Speed Search: Enables fast data querying and manipulation.
Real-Time Analytics: Supports instant insights and decision-making.
Multi-Tenant Architecture: Allows effective data segregation and customization.
Extended Data Retention: Offers 400-day log retention for compliance and analysis.
Complex Log Integration: Handles intricate data sources effortlessly.

What benefits and ROI should organizations look for in reviews?

Visual Insights: Enhance understanding through interactive dashboards.
Performance Efficiency: Saves time with high-speed data search and real-time results.
Customization Flexibility: Fits specific business requirements with multi-tenant architecture.
Long-Term Compliance: Ensures alignment with extended data retention needs.
Centralized Monitoring: Enables comprehensive incident response and security monitoring.

Devo is extensively used in industries focused on incident response and digital forensics, centralizing data for security monitoring across hybrid environments. Organizations benefit from its ability to store and analyze aggregated logs, creating alerts and dashboards to enhance visibility for network and endpoint activities in multi-domain settings.

Devo

Seceon Open Threat Management Platform offers a blend of cost-effectiveness and ease of use, featuring AI, real-time remediation, and endpoint detection, suitable for sectors like finance and healthcare.

Combining AI-driven analysis with real-time threat remediation, Seceon Open Threat Management Platform provides comprehensive security management. Users value its stability and the absence of hardware requirements. Its features, including XDR/EDR and SOC/SOAR, focus on improving response times and lowering costs. The platform's integration capabilities and genuine alert customization enhance its effectiveness. Designed with businesses in mind, it requires no coding for its pre-built features, streamlining processes like threat hunting and incident monitoring through a single license. However, cloud model development and enhanced training are needed, and it entails high costs for smaller enterprises.

What are the most important features?

Artificial Intelligence: Improves threat detection accuracy.
Real-Time Remediation: Automates threat response actions.
Behavior Analytics: Identifies abnormal activities efficiently.
Endpoint Detection: Guards against endpoint vulnerabilities.
Integration Capabilities: Connects with a range of security tools.

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

Cost Reduction: Lowers operational expenses via AI automation.
Quick Onboarding: Accelerated deployment process.
Improved Response Time: Faster threat mitigation.
Minimized Hardware Needs: Decreases infrastructure costs.

Banks and managed security service providers deploy Seceon Open Threat Management Platform to centralize threat management and analysis. In healthcare and finance, it streamlines SIEM management and ensures compliance, leveraging its AI capabilities to provide efficient endpoint protection and enhance security operations. Despite needing better global coverage and management enhancements, it helps manage security events quickly and effectively.

Seceon

Sample Customers

United States Air Force, Rubrik, SentinelOne, Critical Start, NHL, Panda Security, Telefonica, CaixaBank, OpenText, IGT, OneMain Financial, SurveyMonkey, FanDuel, H&R Block, Ulta Beauty, Manulife, Moneylion, Chime Bank, Magna International, American Express Global Business Travel

Caduceus, SUNY

Buyer's Guide

Devo vs. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

August 2026

Free Report: Devo vs. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about Devo vs. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,099 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Devo vs. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform report.

See our list of best Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) vendors.

We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.