Devo vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform comparison

Devo and Seceon are both solutions in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category. Devo is ranked #28 with an average rating of 8.0, while Seceon is ranked #45 with an average rating of 6.0. Devo holds a 1.2% mindshare in SIEM, compared to Seceon’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of Devo users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Seceon users who would recommend it.

Devo

Read 25 Devo reviews

5,955 Views
3,335 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Seceon Open Threat Manageme...

Read 13 Seceon Open Threat Management Platform reviews

2,420 Views
2,372 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Devo

Seceon Open Threat Manageme...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Both Devo and Seceon Open Threat Management Platform offer robust solutions in threat management. Seceon seems to have the upper hand thanks to its automation, cost-effectiveness, and smooth deployment.

Features: Devo is praised for real-time data analytics, scalability, and advanced threat detection. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is commended for comprehensive threat management, ease of use, and automation capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Users suggest Devo enhance its integration capabilities, lower resource consumption, and improve user interface. Seceon users request better documentation, more frequent updates, and enhanced reporting tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Devo users find the deployment straightforward but note occasional support complexities. Seceon is known for smooth deployment and responsive customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Devo's setup costs are high but offer long-term ROI through enhanced security. Seceon provides a more cost-effective initial setup and strong ROI for comprehensive threat management features.

To learn more, read our detailed Devo vs. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Devo vs. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 902,417 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Devo

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

28th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Log Management (26th), IT Operations Analytics (9th), AIOps (18th)

Seceon Open Threat Manageme...

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

45th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category, the mindshare of Devo is 1.2%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is 0.8%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Devo	1.2%
Seceon Open Threat Management Platform	0.8%
Other	98.0%

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

Featured Reviews

Francisco JavierRomo

Strategic Account Executive at a computer software company with 51-200 employees

Has improved investigative workflows with interactive dashboards and simplified data correlation

The data analytics cloud component focuses on real-time analytics, which is very impressive. The SIEM collects and correlates logs data from different sources and can integrate with ServiceNow, hardware asset management, and software asset management. The security orchestration, automation, and response (SOAR) is another valuable feature. The security data platform serves as the foundation of Devo. Regarding advanced query capabilities, Devo offers several models including query logs, visual query builder, language integrated query, and SQL, with SQL being the most frequently used querying data capability. The single pane of glass that Devo offers is the SOC. The tools in Devo's active ports are for investigating, not just viewing data. They are more interactive than other market solutions. The drill-down reports capabilities allow analysts to click on any element in a widget. When they see a spike in a line chart for a failed login, which could be a true or false attempt, they can click that spike, and a table widget on the same active board instantly populates with raw logs of data for those specific failed logins. This is particularly important for enterprise companies with numerous endpoints and users. The dynamic filtering of inputs significantly reduces the time cybersecurity analysts spend trying to figure out failed logins and identifying false positives.

Read full review

Vaibhav Patkar

CISO at Orient Technologies Pvt. Ltd.

Offers remediation capabilities and provides a bird's-eye view of events happening in your environment, summarizing critical events that need attention

One drawback is that it becomes so easy to use that users may lose the habit of manual checks and balances. As a security person, you should always worry about potential threats. If you have a very useful and easy tool, you might lose the ability to think differently and critically. For example, in a group of ten people, if nine think the same way and one thinks differently, you should consider the tenth person's perspective because they might have valuable insights. Having a great product is not always beneficial because you may become too dependent on it, which can be problematic in the long term. If you lose your critical thinking skills, you might not recognize when something abnormal is happening. While the system will notice, systems can have their own challenges and issues. I'm not criticizing the product itself but emphasizing the importance of not being overly dependent on machines. Similar to what we see with Tesla cars, no matter how advanced, there is always a chance things may not work as expected. So, the users need to prepare for that eventuality. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform has some add-ons that they sell as part of the whole suite, but not individually. If they sold them individually, they could potentially get more business.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Those 400 days of hot data mean that people can look for trends and at what happened in the past. And they can not only do so from a security point of view, but even for operational use cases. In the past, our operational norm was to keep live data for only 30 days. Our users were constantly asking us for at least 90 days, and we really couldn't even do that. That's one reason that having 400 days of live data is pretty huge. As our users start to use it and adopt this system, we expect people to be able to do those long-term analytics."

"The real-time analytics of security-related data are super. There are a lot of data feeds going into it and it's very quick at pulling up and correlating the data and showing you what's going on in your infrastructure. It's fast. The way that their architecture and technology works, they've really focused on the speed of query results and making sure that we can do what we need to do quickly. Devo is pulling back information in a fast fashion, based on real-time events."

"I'm so happy with the platform."

"One of the biggest features of the UI is that you see the actual code of what you're doing in the graphical user interface, in a little window on the side. Whatever you're doing, you see the code, what's happening. And you can really quickly switch between using the GUI and using the code. That's really useful."

"Even if it's a relatively technical tool or platform, it's very intuitive and graphical. It's very appealing in terms of the user interface. The UI has a graphically interface with the raw data in a table. The table can be as big as you want it, depending on your use case. You can easily get a report combining your data, along with calculations and graphical dashboards. You don't need a lot of training, because the UI is relatively very intuitive."

"Scalability is one of Devo's strengths."

"Devo provides good value and, given the quality of the product, I would expect to pay more."

"It centralizes security management within a business, functioning as a core system for a SOC."

More Devo pros

"If we compare the solution with other SIEM solutions that are also turning to artificial intelligence, this will be the number one choice."

"Seceon Open Threat Management Platform notifies only genuine alerts. It offers plenty of options that are suitable for MSPs."

"It is effective because it has threat intelligence from across the world and constantly checks and updates for new threats."

"It offers a holistic approach with multiple solutions blended into one platform."

"Seceon Open Threat Management Platform provides a more straightforward implementation that is better than Splunk and offers an AI-based platform with machine learning and deep learning capabilities."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is its artificial intelligence."

"The most valuable features are behaviour analytics, threat intelligence, endpoint detection, and response features."

"We only recently started using Seceon, so we aren't taking advantage of all its features yet. We have enabled some proactive alerts about utilization and bottlenecks from high traffic."

More Seceon Open Threat Management Platform pros

Cons

"My opinion on the solution's technical support is not as great as it could be because of the issues I have faced regarding the service management element."

"There's always room to reduce the learning curve over how to deal with events and machine data. They could make the machine data simpler."

"One major area for improvement for Devo... is to provide more capabilities around pre-built monitoring."

"The biggest area with room for improvement in Devo is the Security Operations module that just isn't there yet."

"Some basic reporting mechanisms have room for improvement."

"Some third-parties don't have specific API connectors built, so we had to work with Devo to get the logs and parse the data using custom parsers, rather than an out-of-the-box solution."

"Devo has a lot of cloud connectors, but they need to do a little bit of work there. They've got good integrations with the public cloud, but there are a lot of cloud SaaS systems that they still need to work with on integrations, such as Salesforce and other SaaS providers where we need to get access logs."

"One improvement area for Devo could be simplifying some configuration and improving the onboarding for new analysts because it is quite complex for fresher or new analysts who are handling Devo."

More Devo cons

"It would be ideal with the processing was more manageable."

"The product should improve the triggering rate."

"Certain features, such as DLP, need to be improved as they are superficial and not in-depth."

"For small to medium-sized customers, Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is good. However, for large enterprises, it is not as effective."

"The product could be improved by including sandboxing capabilities in the next release."

"It is a standalone solution now. They need to make it into a cloud-based subscription model. It needs more compatibility for co-managed solutions. It can also have more threats and deeper integration with Microsoft."

"Seceon Open Threat Management Platform sells some add-ons as part of the whole suite but not individually. If they sold them individually, they could potentially attract more business."

"It needs more compatibility for co-managed solutions."

More Seceon Open Threat Management Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's very competitive. That was also a primary draw for us. Some of the licensing models with solutions like Splunk and Sentinel were attractive upfront, but there were so many micro-charges and services we would've had to add on to make them what we wanted. We had to include things like SOAR and extended capabilities, whereas all those capabilities are completely included with the Devo platform. I haven't seen any additional fee."

"We have an OEM agreement with Devo. It is very similar to the standard licensing agreement because we are charged in the same way as any other customer, e.g., we use the backroom."

"Devo is definitely cheaper than Splunk. There's no doubt about that. The value from Devo is good. It's definitely more valuable to me than QRadar or LogRhythm or any of the old, traditional SIEMs."

"Our licensing fees are billed annually and per terabyte."

"It's a per gigabyte cost for ingestion of data. For every gigabyte that you ingest, it's whatever you negotiated your price for. Compared to other contracts that we've had for cloud providers, it's significantly less."

"I'm not involved in the financial aspect, but I think the licensing costs are similar to other solutions. If all the solutions have a similar cost, Devo provides more for the money."

"Pricing is based on the number of gigabytes of ingestion by volume, and it's on a 30-day average. If you go over one day, that's not a big deal as long as the average is what you expected it to be."

"I rate the pricing a four on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

More Devo pricing and cost advice

"The price is quite reasonable."

"The pricing is very competitive. It's not expensive."

"Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is cost-effective because it's a comprehensive platform that offers high availability."

"We used the solution's trial version for two months and later purchased it."

"I find Seceon OTM's pricing to be reasonable, not too high or low, just okay for the market standards. I can't disclose specific figures, we pay on a quarterly basis under a service model. I would rate it eight out of ten. As a customer, I always hope for better pricing options."

"The solution is cheap and very competitive. It offers good tuning in terms of the pricing. Other solutions like Palo Alto and IBM are more expensive."

"It has a per-asset model instead of an ingestion-based model, which gives predictable pricing. In terms of price, it is in the middle to lower range of SIEMs that it competes against. It is the most affordable solution that we have implemented so far. It was much more affordable than anything else I've implemented."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

902,417 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Construction Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

12%

Computer Software Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	12

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	1

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Devo?

Pricing generally depends on the scale, data ingestion requirements, and integrations for what the enterprise monitoring needs. I have not been part of the procurement process, so I am not aware of...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Devo?

One improvement area for Devo could be simplifying some configuration and improving the onboarding for new analysts because it is quite complex for fresher or new analysts who are handling Devo.UI ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Devo?

Devo serves as our centralized log monitoring, threat investigation, alert monitoring, and security analytics platform. We use it to collect logs from multiple systems so we can correlate the event...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Seceon Open Threat Management Platform?

The pricing of Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is very reasonable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Seceon Open Threat Management Platform?

There are areas for improvement in the customization options. Every ( /products/every-reviews ) quarter, they are developing the platform with new updates based on feedback provided.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Seceon Open Threat Management Platform?

We are a Managed Security Service Provider (MSSP ( /categories/managed-security-services-providers-mssp )), and we provide services to our customers.

See all answers

Comparisons

LogRhythm SIEM vs Devo

Compared 8% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Devo

Compared 7% of the time

New Relic vs Devo

Compared 4% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs Devo

Compared 3% of the time

Microsoft Sentinel vs Devo

Compared 3% of the time

More Devo Competitors

Microsoft Sentinel vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

Compared 13% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

Compared 11% of the time

DNIF HYPERCLOUD vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

Compared 7% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

Compared 6% of the time

LogRhythm SIEM vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

Compared 6% of the time

More Seceon Open Threat Management Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Devo

June 2026

Download Devo product report

Buyer's Guide

Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

May 2026

Seceon Open Threat Management Platform report

Download Seceon Open Threat Management Platform product report

Also Known As

No data available

Seceon OTM, Seceon aiSIEM, aiSIEM, Seceon Open Threat Management

Overview

Devo offers powerful visual analytics, real-time data querying, and log integration capabilities within a cloud-native, multi-tenant architecture, supporting extended data retention ideal for long-term analysis and compliance.

Devo is recognized for its Activeboards, which facilitate visual analytics. High-speed search capabilities and real-time analytics enable efficient data manipulation and querying. Its multi-tenant architecture supports effective data segregation and customization tailored to distinct business needs, enhancing its value for handling complex log integrations. With extended data retention of 400 days and a cloud-native architecture, Devo is a robust platform for long-term analysis and compliance requirements. Though opportunities exist to improve browser stability on large searches, SOAR integrations, and its parser capabilities, Devo remains essential for incident response and security monitoring, offering centralized data storage and analysis.

What are Devo's most important features?

Activeboards: Facilitate visual analytics and data exploration.
High-Speed Search: Enables fast data querying and manipulation.
Real-Time Analytics: Supports instant insights and decision-making.
Multi-Tenant Architecture: Allows effective data segregation and customization.
Extended Data Retention: Offers 400-day log retention for compliance and analysis.
Complex Log Integration: Handles intricate data sources effortlessly.

What benefits and ROI should organizations look for in reviews?

Visual Insights: Enhance understanding through interactive dashboards.
Performance Efficiency: Saves time with high-speed data search and real-time results.
Customization Flexibility: Fits specific business requirements with multi-tenant architecture.
Long-Term Compliance: Ensures alignment with extended data retention needs.
Centralized Monitoring: Enables comprehensive incident response and security monitoring.

Devo is extensively used in industries focused on incident response and digital forensics, centralizing data for security monitoring across hybrid environments. Organizations benefit from its ability to store and analyze aggregated logs, creating alerts and dashboards to enhance visibility for network and endpoint activities in multi-domain settings.

Devo

Seceon Open Threat Management Platform offers a blend of cost-effectiveness and ease of use, featuring AI, real-time remediation, and endpoint detection, suitable for sectors like finance and healthcare.

Combining AI-driven analysis with real-time threat remediation, Seceon Open Threat Management Platform provides comprehensive security management. Users value its stability and the absence of hardware requirements. Its features, including XDR/EDR and SOC/SOAR, focus on improving response times and lowering costs. The platform's integration capabilities and genuine alert customization enhance its effectiveness. Designed with businesses in mind, it requires no coding for its pre-built features, streamlining processes like threat hunting and incident monitoring through a single license. However, cloud model development and enhanced training are needed, and it entails high costs for smaller enterprises.

What are the most important features?

Artificial Intelligence: Improves threat detection accuracy.
Real-Time Remediation: Automates threat response actions.
Behavior Analytics: Identifies abnormal activities efficiently.
Endpoint Detection: Guards against endpoint vulnerabilities.
Integration Capabilities: Connects with a range of security tools.

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

Cost Reduction: Lowers operational expenses via AI automation.
Quick Onboarding: Accelerated deployment process.
Improved Response Time: Faster threat mitigation.
Minimized Hardware Needs: Decreases infrastructure costs.

Banks and managed security service providers deploy Seceon Open Threat Management Platform to centralize threat management and analysis. In healthcare and finance, it streamlines SIEM management and ensures compliance, leveraging its AI capabilities to provide efficient endpoint protection and enhance security operations. Despite needing better global coverage and management enhancements, it helps manage security events quickly and effectively.

Seceon

Sample Customers

United States Air Force, Rubrik, SentinelOne, Critical Start, NHL, Panda Security, Telefonica, CaixaBank, OpenText, IGT, OneMain Financial, SurveyMonkey, FanDuel, H&R Block, Ulta Beauty, Manulife, Moneylion, Chime Bank, Magna International, American Express Global Business Travel

Caduceus, SUNY

Buyer's Guide

Devo vs. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

June 2026

Free Report: Devo vs. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about Devo vs. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

902,417 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Devo vs. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform report.

See our list of best Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) vendors.

We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.