Devo vs Rapid7 InsightOps comparison

Devo and Rapid7 are both solutions in the Log Management category. Devo is ranked #18 with an average rating of 8.3, while Rapid7 is ranked #28 with an average rating of 9.0. Devo holds a 1.4% mindshare in Log Management, compared to Rapid7’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Devo users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Rapid7 users who would recommend it.

Devo

Read 27 Devo reviews

6,972 Views
3,625 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Rapid7 InsightOps

Read 10 Rapid7 InsightOps reviews

2,147 Views
2,061 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Devo

Rapid7 InsightOps

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Rapid7 InsightOps and Devo compete in the log management and SIEM solutions category. Devo seems to have the upper hand due to its superior feature richness, which balances its higher pricing.

Features: Rapid7 InsightOps provides detailed security analytics, seamless integration options, and user-friendly interfaces. Devo offers real-time big data processing, a scalable architecture, and a comprehensive feature set that users prefer for its advanced capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Rapid7 InsightOps needs to enhance reporting capabilities, performance optimization, and expand its customization options. Devo could improve its intuitive configuration settings, alerting functions, and make minor user interface refinements. Feedback indicates Rapid7 requires more urgent development areas.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Rapid7 InsightOps is noted for an intuitive setup process and reliable customer service, facilitating easier deployment. Devo requires more initial effort due to extensive features but benefits from robust support resources, assisting users with complex configurations.

Pricing and ROI: Rapid7 InsightOps is viewed as having a competitive pricing model with a quick ROI thanks to seamless integration. Devo's higher pricing is justified by the extensive feature set, offering significant long-term ROI. InsightOps is considered immediately cost-effective while Devo's broader benefits manifest over time.

To learn more, read our detailed Devo vs. Rapid7 InsightOps Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Devo vs. Rapid7 InsightOps

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,948 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Devo

Ranking in Log Management

18th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (18th), IT Operations Analytics (7th), AIOps (13th)

Rapid7 InsightOps

Ranking in Log Management

28th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of Devo is 1.4%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Rapid7 InsightOps is 0.8%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Log Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Devo	1.4%
Rapid7 InsightOps	0.8%
Other	97.8%

Log Management

Featured Reviews

Usama Khan

Team Lead SOC at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Advanced threat hunting has improved SOC visibility and now supports faster incident response

Devo can improve in how its connectors enhance integration with third-party tools. Devo's architecture works by having you deploy a relay server in the data center of the client side and Devo SIEM is basically on the AWS cloud. There are specific ports which are enabled on the relay server, which are 514 and 13000, 13151, 152. However, when we talk about databases and custom integrations, there are not default ports in the relay server. No default ports are defined. For JDBC drivers, the port number is 1433, but it is not in the relay server. You have to add it manually. For Oracle RDBMS, the port is 1521, and it is also not there by default. I would appreciate more third-party integrations including Fortinet and others. Machine learning models can also be improved. Playbooks in the SOAR can also be improved. Regarding playbooks for automation, we utilize playbooks for automation in SOAR for automated IOC blocking on a firewall, on a web application firewall, on DNS security, etc. The only option for us to run the playbook is to schedule the job for it. However, if I want to manually run the playbook, there is no option for doing so. This needs improvement.

Read full review

reviewer1247523

Head of Sales Services Department at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees

Customization and automation streamline workflows for seamless operations

The features of Rapid7 InsightOps that I have found most valuable are the predefined policies and the use of correlation rules, which are very valuable because they eliminate the need to spend time creating those rules. This feature detects insider threats or compromised credentials by using user behavior analytics, which can collect other compromise indicators. It makes it easier to install and implement this solution because you can run it as normal behavior of users and then switch off to look for the anomalous behavior of any entities, such as laptops and others. In any violation or restricted behavior, the system will notify you that something unusual is occurring. The machine learning algorithms in Rapid7 InsightIDR for threat detection work quite effectively as part of the user entity behavior analytic model, allowing us to focus group normal typical behavior of users and then turn on the rule to spot any unexpected behavior. The automation features of Rapid7 InsightOps are quite satisfactory, as users appreciate these features, especially when integrating with the ticketing system. If something goes wrong, InsightOps will notify the ticketing system to create a ticket and assign it to the responsible person to handle the events found in the infrastructure. The customizable dashboards in Rapid7 InsightOps are quite valuable and interesting because SOC center operators spend most of their time investigating on those dashboards, making them easy to manage. Additionally, we can configure email reports for high-level talks, sending historical data without needing to look online, which is very convenient.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I'm so happy with the platform."

"It's very, very versatile."

"The drill-down reports capabilities allow analysts to click on any element in a widget. When they see a spike in a line chart for a failed login, which could be a true or false attempt, they can click that spike, and a table widget on the same active board instantly populates with raw logs of data for those specific failed logins."

"The real-time analytics of security-related data are super. There are a lot of data feeds going into it and it's very quick at pulling up and correlating the data and showing you what's going on in your infrastructure. It's fast. The way that their architecture and technology works, they've really focused on the speed of query results and making sure that we can do what we need to do quickly. Devo is pulling back information in a fast fashion, based on real-time events."

"The thing that Devo does better than other solutions is to give me the ability to write queries that look at multiple data sources and run fast. Most SIEMs don't do that. And I can do that by creating entity-based queries. Let's say I have a table which has Okta, a table which has G Suite, a table which has endpoint telemetry, and I have a table which has DNS telemetry. I can write a query that says, 'Join all these things together on IP, and where the IP matches in all these tables, return to me that subset of data, within these time windows.' I can break it down that way."

"The ability to have high performance, high-speed search capability is incredibly important for us. When it comes to doing security analysis, you don't want to be doing is sitting around waiting to get data back while an attacker is sitting on a network, actively attacking it. You need to be able to answer questions quickly. If I see an indicator of attack, I need to be able to rapidly pivot and find data, then analyze it and find more data to answer more questions. You need to be able to do that quickly. If I'm sitting around just waiting to get my first response, then it ends up moving too slow to keep up with the attacker. Devo's speed and performance allows us to query in real-time and keep up with what is actually happening on the network, then respond effectively to events."

"Devo's speed and performance allows us to query in real-time and keep up with what is actually happening on the network, then respond effectively to events."

"It is a joy to partner and be able to work with this kind of system."

More Devo pros

"The machine learning algorithms in Rapid7 InsightIDR for threat detection work quite effectively as part of the user entity behavior analytic model, allowing us to focus group normal typical behavior of users and then turn on the rule to spot any unexpected behavior."

"The log aggregation and research capabilities are definitely what pays for itself."

"We can save logs as plain text."

"The most valuable feature of Rapid7 InsightOps is the search functionality."

"My advice to others is this is an easy-to-use solution and they should try it out."

"Easy to use and spend less time on setups/troubleshooting."

"We get way more out of it than we did with SecureWorks and we pay about a third of the price."

"I use it as a security incident and event management system, and it has the ability to alert and track logs from different sources."

More Rapid7 InsightOps pros

Cons

"The biggest area with room for improvement in Devo is the Security Operations module that just isn't there yet."

"The overall performance of extraction could be a lot faster, but that's a common problem in this space in general. Also, the stock or default alerting and detecting options could definitely be broader and more all-encompassing. The fact that they're not is why we had to write all our own alerts."

"The Activeboards feature is not as mature regarding the look and feel. Its functionality is mature, but the look and feel is not there. For example, if you have some data sets and are trying to get some graphics, you cannot change anything. There's just one format for the graphics. You cannot change the size of the font, the font itself, etc."

"There is room for improvement in the ability to parse different log types. I would go as far as to say the product is deficient in its ability to parse multiple, different log types, including logs from major vendors that are supported by competitors. Additionally, the time that it takes to turn around a supported parser for customers and common log source types, which are generally accepted standards in the industry, is not acceptable. This has impacted customer onboarding and customer relationships for us on multiple fronts."

"Devo has a lot of cloud connectors, but they need to do a little bit of work there. They've got good integrations with the public cloud, but there are a lot of cloud SaaS systems that they still need to work with on integrations, such as Salesforce and other SaaS providers where we need to get access logs."

"My opinion on the solution's technical support is not as great as it could be because of the issues I have faced regarding the service management element."

"One improvement area for Devo could be simplifying some configuration and improving the onboarding for new analysts because it is quite complex for fresher or new analysts who are handling Devo."

"There's always room to reduce the learning curve over how to deal with events and machine data. They could make the machine data simpler."

More Devo cons

"The solution takes a little bit of time when we load the website for the first time."

"Since I used the beta, improvements are to be expected. The dashboard options could have been clearer, but I believe it is more a problem with the limited documentation available at the time."

"Rapid7 InsightOps could improve by making the search query better. There are times when the search query is broken and it does not find anything."

"There are a few things I would like to do with a few more complex queries which I am not able to do right now, because it is a SaaS solution."

"There were some difficulties in product setup, but after those issues were resolved, there were no issues."

"The searching capability, or when you ask real time questions, is pretty decent but it's still not up to par with, say, Splunk."

"Improvement is needed in the dashboard of InsightOps, especially for less technical users."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the pricing a four on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

"We have an OEM agreement with Devo. It is very similar to the standard licensing agreement because we are charged in the same way as any other customer, e.g., we use the backroom."

"It's very competitive. That was also a primary draw for us. Some of the licensing models with solutions like Splunk and Sentinel were attractive upfront, but there were so many micro-charges and services we would've had to add on to make them what we wanted. We had to include things like SOAR and extended capabilities, whereas all those capabilities are completely included with the Devo platform. I haven't seen any additional fee."

"I'm not involved in the financial aspect, but I think the licensing costs are similar to other solutions. If all the solutions have a similar cost, Devo provides more for the money."

"Pricing is based on the number of gigabytes of ingestion by volume, and it's on a 30-day average. If you go over one day, that's not a big deal as long as the average is what you expected it to be."

"Devo is definitely cheaper than Splunk. There's no doubt about that. The value from Devo is good. It's definitely more valuable to me than QRadar or LogRhythm or any of the old, traditional SIEMs."

"Be cautious of metadata inclusion for log types in pricing, as there are some "gotchas" with that."

"The way Devo prices things is based on the amount of data, and I wish the tiers had more granularity. Maybe at this point they do, but when we first negotiated with them, there were only three or four tiers."

More Devo pricing and cost advice

"The product is cheap."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,948 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Construction Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Outsourcing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	12

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Devo?

The pricing of the product is reasonable if we compare it with other Gartner leading products like Splunk, LogRhythm, Microsoft Sentinel, Google SecOps. Its licensing model is basically on per-day ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Devo?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Devo?

I am using Devo myself. Basically, I work at an MSSP, and we provide services to the organization for Security Operation Centers. In our Security Operation Center, we provide the service of SIEM vi...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Rapid7 InsightOps?

In my opinion, there are no specific areas of Rapid7 InsightIDR that need improvement because all solutions in the SIEM market, including InsightOps and its competitors, are doing the same things b...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Rapid7 InsightOps?

The usual use cases for Rapid7 InsightOps that I work with are to meet standard requirements such as PCI DSS and ISO standards, collecting data and protecting event logs. Rapid7 InsightOps plays a ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Rapid7 InsightOps?

The integration capabilities of Rapid7 InsightIDR with other security or IT management tools are quite simple. To integrate with another solution, you just need that solution to push system logs in...

See all answers

Comparisons

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Devo

Compared 8% of the time

LogRhythm SIEM vs Devo

Compared 7% of the time

New Relic vs Devo

Compared 4% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs Devo

Compared 3% of the time

Datadog vs Devo

Compared 3% of the time

More Devo Competitors

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Rapid7 InsightOps

Compared 9% of the time

Datadog vs Rapid7 InsightOps

Compared 7% of the time

Wazuh vs Rapid7 InsightOps

Compared 6% of the time

Grafana Loki vs Rapid7 InsightOps

Compared 5% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs Rapid7 InsightOps

Compared 5% of the time

More Rapid7 InsightOps Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Devo

August 2026

Download Devo product report

Buyer's Guide

Rapid7 InsightOps

August 2026

Download Rapid7 InsightOps product report

Also Known As

No data available

InsightOps, Logentries

Overview

Devo offers powerful visual analytics, real-time data querying, and log integration capabilities within a cloud-native, multi-tenant architecture, supporting extended data retention ideal for long-term analysis and compliance.

Devo is recognized for its Activeboards, which facilitate visual analytics. High-speed search capabilities and real-time analytics enable efficient data manipulation and querying. Its multi-tenant architecture supports effective data segregation and customization tailored to distinct business needs, enhancing its value for handling complex log integrations. With extended data retention of 400 days and a cloud-native architecture, Devo is a robust platform for long-term analysis and compliance requirements. Though opportunities exist to improve browser stability on large searches, SOAR integrations, and its parser capabilities, Devo remains essential for incident response and security monitoring, offering centralized data storage and analysis.

What are Devo's most important features?

Activeboards: Facilitate visual analytics and data exploration.
High-Speed Search: Enables fast data querying and manipulation.
Real-Time Analytics: Supports instant insights and decision-making.
Multi-Tenant Architecture: Allows effective data segregation and customization.
Extended Data Retention: Offers 400-day log retention for compliance and analysis.
Complex Log Integration: Handles intricate data sources effortlessly.

What benefits and ROI should organizations look for in reviews?

Visual Insights: Enhance understanding through interactive dashboards.
Performance Efficiency: Saves time with high-speed data search and real-time results.
Customization Flexibility: Fits specific business requirements with multi-tenant architecture.
Long-Term Compliance: Ensures alignment with extended data retention needs.
Centralized Monitoring: Enables comprehensive incident response and security monitoring.

Devo is extensively used in industries focused on incident response and digital forensics, centralizing data for security monitoring across hybrid environments. Organizations benefit from its ability to store and analyze aggregated logs, creating alerts and dashboards to enhance visibility for network and endpoint activities in multi-domain settings.

Devo

Rapid7 InsightOps provides asset management, log tracking, and issue resolution with machine learning threat detection, enhancing integration with various systems for real-time monitoring across networks.

Rapid7 InsightOps enables businesses to track assets, manage logs, and resolve issues efficiently. It offers predefined policies, customizable dashboards, and ticketing system integrations. Its endpoint agent ensures real-time monitoring and forensic analysis, aiding incident response and root cause analysis. Log aggregation and search functionality enhance operational efficiency by integrating with SIEM systems. Improvements in search capabilities, interface user-friendliness, and expanded security features could significantly boost user experience and performance.

Why consider Rapid7 InsightOps?

Comprehensive Asset Management: Ensures efficient asset tracking and management across networks.
Efficient Log Tracking: Aggregates log data for enhanced incident response and analysis.
Machine Learning Detection: Utilizes machine learning to identify threats and suspicious activities.
Customizable Dashboards: Allows tailored views for better visualization and analysis.
SIEM Integration: Boosts operational efficiency with seamless SIEM system integration.

What benefits should users look for?

Improved Compliance: Meets regulatory standards like PCI DSS and ISO, essential for finance sectors.
Enhanced Security Posture: Proactive threat detection and quick issue resolution improve security.
Operational Efficiency: Streamlines processes with integration and real-time monitoring.
Cost Savings: Reduces manual intervention and potential breaches through automation.

Finance sectors extensively implement Rapid7 InsightOps for alert generation, suspicious login detection, and ensuring regulatory compliance. It helps in monitoring IT environments by centralizing log data, analyzing unexpected behavior, data discrepancies, and checking message deliveries, vital for maintaining security and operational standards.

Rapid7

Sample Customers

United States Air Force, Rubrik, SentinelOne, Critical Start, NHL, Panda Security, Telefonica, CaixaBank, OpenText, IGT, OneMain Financial, SurveyMonkey, FanDuel, H&R Block, Ulta Beauty, Manulife, Moneylion, Chime Bank, Magna International, American Express Global Business Travel

Trimble Navigation Limited

Buyer's Guide

Devo vs. Rapid7 InsightOps

August 2026

Free Report: Devo vs. Rapid7 InsightOps

Find out what your peers are saying about Devo vs. Rapid7 InsightOps and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,948 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Devo vs. Rapid7 InsightOps report.

See our list of best Log Management vendors.

We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.