Devo vs NetCrunch comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Devo and AdRem Software are both solutions in the Log Management category. Devo is ranked #21 with an average rating of 7.9, while AdRem Software is ranked #51. Devo holds a 1.4% mindshare in Log Management, compared to AdRem Software’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Devo users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of AdRem Software users who would recommend it.

Devo

Read 30 Devo reviews

8,527 Views
4,349 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

NetCrunch

Read 3 NetCrunch reviews

5,442 Views
1,796 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Devo

NetCrunch

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

NetCrunch and Devo are network monitoring and analysis tools competing in the same category. While Devo stands out with its advanced features, NetCrunch excels in pricing and support, providing a competitive edge due to its affordability and ease of use.

Features: NetCrunch is known for its comprehensive monitoring capabilities, robust alert system, and user-friendly interface. Devo offers advanced data analytics, impressive scalability, and extensive reporting tools, providing a competitive edge in features.

Room for Improvement: NetCrunch users highlight the need for better integration with third-party tools, enhanced reporting capabilities, and improved dashboard customization. Devo users suggest improvements in documentation, user training resources, and a more intuitive user interface.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: NetCrunch is favored for its easy deployment and intuitive setup, along with responsive customer service. Devo, while offering powerful deployment options, requires more technical expertise but is backed by robust customer service. The simplicity of NetCrunch contrasts with the advanced deployment features of Devo.

Pricing and ROI: NetCrunch offers an attractive setup cost, often delivering faster ROI due to lower upfront investment. In contrast, Devo's higher setup costs are justified by a strong long-term ROI, driven by feature-rich offerings. Users find NetCrunch cost-effective while recognizing Devo's long-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed Devo vs. NetCrunch Report (Updated: November 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Devo vs. NetCrunch

November 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 921,523 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Devo

Ranking in Log Management

21st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (16th), IT Operations Analytics (7th), AIOps (17th)

NetCrunch

Ranking in Log Management

51st

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (70th), Server Monitoring (27th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (62nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of Devo is 1.4%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NetCrunch is 0.9%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Log Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Devo	1.4%
NetCrunch	0.9%
Other	97.7%

Log Management

Featured Reviews

Usama Khan

Team Lead Soc at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Advanced threat hunting has improved SOC visibility and now supports faster incident response

Devo can improve in how its connectors enhance integration with third-party tools. Devo's architecture works by having you deploy a relay server in the data center of the client side and Devo SIEM is basically on the AWS cloud. There are specific ports which are enabled on the relay server, which are 514 and 13000, 13151, 152. However, when we talk about databases and custom integrations, there are not default ports in the relay server. No default ports are defined. For JDBC drivers, the port number is 1433, but it is not in the relay server. You have to add it manually. For Oracle RDBMS, the port is 1521, and it is also not there by default. I would appreciate more third-party integrations including Fortinet and others. Machine learning models can also be improved. Playbooks in the SOAR can also be improved. Regarding playbooks for automation, we utilize playbooks for automation in SOAR for automated IOC blocking on a firewall, on a web application firewall, on DNS security, etc. The only option for us to run the playbook is to schedule the job for it. However, if I want to manually run the playbook, there is no option for doing so. This needs improvement.

Read full review

it_user1038504

Senior Systems Administrator, Technical Lead at Connectivity Wireless

A network monitoring platform with a useful reporting feature, but permission-based options could be better

The initial setup is fairly easy. Most of it's wizard-based. You don't have to be a rocket scientist to set it up. But if you don't know certain things related to protocols and everything else, it might be difficult. If you know how SNMP works, it'll be fairly simple to set up.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The user interface is really modern. As an end-user, there are a lot of possibilities to tailor the platform to your needs, and that can be done without needing much support from Devo. It's really flexible and modular. The UI is very clean."

"One of the biggest features of the UI is that you see the actual code of what you're doing in the graphical user interface, in a little window on the side. Whatever you're doing, you see the code, what's happening. And you can really quickly switch between using the GUI and using the code. That's really useful."

"Devo has the best features for us because we store close to two terabytes a day of data, and it has come in handy for that as I don't find the system to really lag."

"Because of the way Devo works, our onboarding time has shrunk by 50 percent at least."

"Devo has improved our visibility, log management efficiency, and investigation capabilities positively."

"In traditional BI solutions, you need to wait a lot of time to have the ability to create visualizations with the data and to do searches. With this kind of platform, you have that information in real-time."

"The thing that Devo does better than other solutions is to give me the ability to write queries that look at multiple data sources and run fast. Most SIEMs don't do that. And I can do that by creating entity-based queries. Let's say I have a table which has Okta, a table which has G Suite, a table which has endpoint telemetry, and I have a table which has DNS telemetry. I can write a query that says, 'Join all these things together on IP, and where the IP matches in all these tables, return to me that subset of data, within these time windows.' I can break it down that way."

"One of the immediate improvements that come to mind is the amount of hot, searchable data, as in the SIEM we had before we were only able to search back 90 days of hot, searchable data, whereas here we have 400 days worth, which has definitely improved our threat hunting capabilities."

More Devo pros

"The setup is very intuitive and quick - it all just took a few minutes we were done."

"Reporting on NetCrunch is pretty good; it's very similar to SolarWinds, just with a different interface, and the majority of everything there was beneficial."

Cons

"The biggest area with room for improvement in Devo is the Security Operations module that just isn't there yet. That goes back to building out how they're going to do content and larger correlation and aggregation of data across multiple things, as well as natively ingesting CTI to create rule sets."

"One improvement area for Devo could be simplifying some configuration and improving the onboarding for new analysts because it is quite complex for fresher or new analysts who are handling Devo."

"Where Devo has room for improvement is the data ingestion and parsing. We tend to have to work with the Devo support team to bring on and ingest new sources of data."

"I would like to have the ability to create more complex dashboards."

"Devo has a lot of cloud connectors, but they need to do a little bit of work there."

"My opinion on the solution's technical support is not as great as it could be because of the issues I have faced regarding the service management element."

"There's room for improvement within the GUI. There is also some room for improvement within the native parsers they support. But I can say that about pretty much any solution in this space."

"An admin who is trying to audit user activity usually cannot go beyond a day in the UI. I would like to have access to pages and pages of that data, going back as far as the storage we have, so I could look at every command or search or deletion or anything that a user has run. As an admin, that would really help. Going back just a day in the UI is not going to help, and that means I have to find a different way to do that."

More Devo cons

"I didn't care for the role-based, permission-based options, which were not the best."

"Our network is made up of a lot of Cisco devices, and it needs improvements."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Our licensing fees are billed annually and per terabyte."

"Devo is definitely cheaper than Splunk. There's no doubt about that. The value from Devo is good. It's definitely more valuable to me than QRadar or LogRhythm or any of the old, traditional SIEMs."

"It's a per gigabyte cost for ingestion of data. For every gigabyte that you ingest, it's whatever you negotiated your price for. Compared to other contracts that we've had for cloud providers, it's significantly less."

"Be cautious of metadata inclusion for log types in pricing, as there are some "gotchas" with that."

"I'm not involved in the financial aspect, but I think the licensing costs are similar to other solutions. If all the solutions have a similar cost, Devo provides more for the money."

"I like the pricing very much. They keep it simple. It is a single price based on data ingested, and they do it on an average. If you get a spike of data that flows in, they will not stick it to you or charge you for that. They are very fair about that."

"I rate the pricing a four on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

"Pricing is based on the number of gigabytes of ingestion by volume, and it's on a 30-day average. If you go over one day, that's not a big deal as long as the average is what you expected it to be."

More Devo pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Outsourcing Company

11%

Construction Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

21%

Comms Service Provider

17%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	15

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Devo?

The pricing could be simpler, and while the initial setup cost for a new instance is a bit expensive, the licensing can currently be user-based or driven by log volume, which is better if there is ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Devo?

In terms of improvements, I think Devo falls short with their support model, as they rely mainly on their support team in Spain. Although they do have a support team in North America, they lack kno...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Devo?

Devo is the bank's centralized log management platform that my team and I rely on the most. For centralized log management in our day-to-day work, one of the biggest data users would be our Red...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Devo

Compared 7% of the time

LogRhythm SIEM vs Devo

Compared 6% of the time

New Relic vs Devo

Compared 4% of the time

Datadog vs Devo

Compared 3% of the time

Palantir Foundry vs Devo

Compared 2% of the time

More Devo Competitors

SolarWinds NPM vs NetCrunch

Compared 5% of the time

Zabbix vs NetCrunch

Compared 4% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs NetCrunch

Compared 3% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs NetCrunch

Compared 3% of the time

Nagios XI vs NetCrunch

Compared 3% of the time

More NetCrunch Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Devo

November 2026

Download Devo product report

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

October 2026

Download NetCrunch product report

Overview

Devo offers powerful visual analytics, real-time data querying, and log integration capabilities within a cloud-native, multi-tenant architecture, supporting extended data retention ideal for long-term analysis and compliance.

Devo is recognized for its Activeboards, which facilitate visual analytics. High-speed search capabilities and real-time analytics enable efficient data manipulation and querying. Its multi-tenant architecture supports effective data segregation and customization tailored to distinct business needs, enhancing its value for handling complex log integrations. With extended data retention of 400 days and a cloud-native architecture, Devo is a robust platform for long-term analysis and compliance requirements. Though opportunities exist to improve browser stability on large searches, SOAR integrations, and its parser capabilities, Devo remains essential for incident response and security monitoring, offering centralized data storage and analysis.

What are Devo's most important features?

Activeboards: Facilitate visual analytics and data exploration.
High-Speed Search: Enables fast data querying and manipulation.
Real-Time Analytics: Supports instant insights and decision-making.
Multi-Tenant Architecture: Allows effective data segregation and customization.
Extended Data Retention: Offers 400-day log retention for compliance and analysis.
Complex Log Integration: Handles intricate data sources effortlessly.

What benefits and ROI should organizations look for in reviews?

Visual Insights: Enhance understanding through interactive dashboards.
Performance Efficiency: Saves time with high-speed data search and real-time results.
Customization Flexibility: Fits specific business requirements with multi-tenant architecture.
Long-Term Compliance: Ensures alignment with extended data retention needs.
Centralized Monitoring: Enables comprehensive incident response and security monitoring.

Devo is extensively used in industries focused on incident response and digital forensics, centralizing data for security monitoring across hybrid environments. Organizations benefit from its ability to store and analyze aggregated logs, creating alerts and dashboards to enhance visibility for network and endpoint activities in multi-domain settings.

Devo

NetCrunch by AdRem Software is commercial, self-hosted, agentless network and IT infrastructure monitoring software for Windows Server. It monitors network devices, servers, virtualization platforms, cloud services, applications, logs, websites, traffic flows, and telemetry across on-premises and hybrid IT environments.

The platform is ideal for day-2 operations, supporting 680+ monitoring targets and providing 270+ ready-to-use Monitoring Packs for devices, applications, and operating systems. NetCrunch uses correlated alerting and built-in automation to reduce alert noise and streamline monitoring workflows. Distributed Monitoring Probes extend monitoring to remote and isolated locations. Licensing is based on monitored nodes and network interfaces rather than individual sensors, checks, or metrics.

What are NetCrunch's most important features?

Policy-based monitoring: Automatically applies monitoring settings, Monitoring Packs, thresholds, and alerts to matching devices and systems.
Integrated monitoring: Covers network devices, servers, virtualization platforms, cloud services, applications, websites, logs, telemetry, and network traffic analysis using NetFlow, sFlow, IPFIX, and other flow technologies.
Correlated alerting: Reduces alert noise through event correlation, dependencies, filtering, delay rules, and escalation, with automated response actions.

What benefits should users expect from NetCrunch?

Centralized management: A self-hosted NetCrunch Server provides centralized monitoring, while optional Monitoring Probes extend coverage to remote and isolated locations.
Predictable licensing: Licensing is based on monitored nodes and network interfaces rather than individual sensors, checks, or metrics.
Self-hosted deployment: NetCrunch runs on Windows Server and can monitor infrastructure deployed on-premises, in the cloud, or across hybrid environments.

Because NetCrunch is self-hosted, organizations can keep monitoring data within customer-controlled infrastructure. This makes it suitable for organizations that prioritize data sovereignty and control over monitoring data.

AdRem Software

Sample Customers

United States Air Force, Rubrik, SentinelOne, Critical Start, NHL, Panda Security, Telefonica, CaixaBank, OpenText, IGT, OneMain Financial, SurveyMonkey, FanDuel, H&R Block, Ulta Beauty, Manulife, Moneylion, Chime Bank, Magna International, American Express Global Business Travel

manufacturing, banking, utilities, energy, universities, healthcare institutions, school districts, military and police entities, non-profit organizations,

Buyer's Guide

Devo vs. NetCrunch

November 2026

Free Report: Devo vs. NetCrunch

Find out what your peers are saying about Devo vs. NetCrunch and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Devo vs. NetCrunch report.

See our list of best Log Management vendors.

We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.