Devo vs Logsign Next-Gen SIEM comparison

Devo and Logsign are both solutions in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category. Devo is ranked #18 with an average rating of 8.3, while Logsign is ranked #47. Devo holds a 1.2% mindshare in SIEM, compared to Logsign’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Devo users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Logsign users who would recommend it.

Devo

Read 26 Devo reviews

6,972 Views
3,835 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Logsign Next-Gen SIEM

Read 4 Logsign Next-Gen SIEM reviews

3,552 Views
2,451 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Devo

Logsign Next-Gen SIEM

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Logsign Next-Gen SIEM and Devo are popular SIEM solutions. Devo has the upper hand due to its advanced features and better performance despite its higher cost.

Features: Logsign Next-Gen SIEM offers customizable dashboards, real-time alerting, and comprehensive analytics. Devo provides advanced data correlation capabilities, scalability, and fast query performance. Devo’s performance and scalability give it an edge.

Room for Improvement: Logsign Next-Gen SIEM could enhance integration with third-party tools, simplify initial setup configurations, and improve its user interface. Devo needs better documentation, more transparent pricing plans, and enhanced multi-tenant support.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Logsign Next-Gen SIEM is noted for straightforward deployment and responsive customer service. Devo is praised for deployment flexibility and robust customer support. Logsign's slightly easier deployment offers a marginal advantage.

Pricing and ROI: Logsign Next-Gen SIEM has competitive pricing and favorable ROI, attractive for budget-conscious buyers. Devo, although more expensive, offers better overall ROI due to its advanced features.

To learn more, read our detailed Devo vs. Logsign Next-Gen SIEM Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Devo vs. Logsign Next-Gen SIEM

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,877 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Devo

Ranking in Log Management

18th

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

18th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Operations Analytics (7th), AIOps (13th)

Logsign Next-Gen SIEM

Ranking in Log Management

48th

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

47th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category, the mindshare of Devo is 1.2%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Logsign Next-Gen SIEM is 1.0%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Devo	1.2%
Logsign Next-Gen SIEM	1.0%
Other	97.8%

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

Featured Reviews

Usama Khan

Team Lead SOC at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Advanced threat hunting has improved SOC visibility and now supports faster incident response

Devo can improve in how its connectors enhance integration with third-party tools. Devo's architecture works by having you deploy a relay server in the data center of the client side and Devo SIEM is basically on the AWS cloud. There are specific ports which are enabled on the relay server, which are 514 and 13000, 13151, 152. However, when we talk about databases and custom integrations, there are not default ports in the relay server. No default ports are defined. For JDBC drivers, the port number is 1433, but it is not in the relay server. You have to add it manually. For Oracle RDBMS, the port is 1521, and it is also not there by default. I would appreciate more third-party integrations including Fortinet and others. Machine learning models can also be improved. Playbooks in the SOAR can also be improved. Regarding playbooks for automation, we utilize playbooks for automation in SOAR for automated IOC blocking on a firewall, on a web application firewall, on DNS security, etc. The only option for us to run the playbook is to schedule the job for it. However, if I want to manually run the playbook, there is no option for doing so. This needs improvement.

Read full review

Thanuja Karunarathne

Engineer at Connex Information Technologies

Real-time monitoring and analytics are very easy and fast and very easy to use

The alerting and real-time analytics helped the security team. They are using a Hadoop database, so real-time monitoring and analytics are very easy and fast. Queries return results quickly and in very small time. It has full automation and automated SIEM responses. We are currently only testing Logsign, but in a few months, we plan to integrate our servers, routers, firewalls, and endpoints into our company's Logsign instance. Then, we can manage everything using Logsign.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Even if it's a relatively technical tool or platform, it's very intuitive and graphical. It's very appealing in terms of the user interface. The UI has a graphically interface with the raw data in a table. The table can be as big as you want it, depending on your use case. You can easily get a report combining your data, along with calculations and graphical dashboards. You don't need a lot of training, because the UI is relatively very intuitive."

"The most useful feature for us, because of some of the issues we had previously, was the simplicity of log integrations. It's much easier with this platform to integrate log sources that might not have standard logging and things like that."

"But from a SaaS standpoint, if not best-in-breed, Devo is certainly in the top-two or top-three."

"One of the immediate improvements that come to mind is the amount of hot, searchable data, as in the SIEM we had before we were only able to search back 90 days of hot, searchable data, whereas here we have 400 days worth, which has definitely improved our threat hunting capabilities."

"The alerting is much better than I anticipated. We don't get as many alerts as I thought we would, but that nobody's fault, it's just the way it is."

"Devo provides good value and, given the quality of the product, I would expect to pay more."

"It centralizes security management within a business, functioning as a core system for a SOC."

"Devo has a really good website for creating custom configurations."

More Devo pros

"It has full automation and automated SIEM responses."

"Logsign provides sample logs within the product, allowing users to see how logs will appear before integration, which is a valuable feature for testing and understanding log formats."

"The most valuable features of Logsign SIEM are its cloud capabilities, alerting functionality, integration with Elastic Search, and configuration options."

Cons

"The Activeboards feature is not as mature regarding the look and feel."

"An admin who is trying to audit user activity usually cannot go beyond a day in the UI. I would like to have access to pages and pages of that data, going back as far as the storage we have, so I could look at every command or search or deletion or anything that a user has run. As an admin, that would really help. Going back just a day in the UI is not going to help, and that means I have to find a different way to do that."

"We only use the core functionality and one of the reasons for this is that their security operation center needs improvement."

"The overall performance of extraction could be a lot faster, but that's a common problem in this space in general. Also, the stock or default alerting and detecting options could definitely be broader and more all-encompassing. The fact that they're not is why we had to write all our own alerts."

"My opinion on the solution's technical support is not as great as it could be because of the issues I have faced regarding the service management element."

"There are some issues from an availability and functionality standpoint, meaning the tool is somewhat slow. There were some slow response periods over the past six to nine months, though it has yet to impact us terribly as we are a relatively small shop. We've noticed it, however, so Devo could improve the responsiveness."

"The biggest area with room for improvement in Devo is the Security Operations module that just isn't there yet. That goes back to building out how they're going to do content and larger correlation and aggregation of data across multiple things, as well as natively ingesting CTI to create rule sets."

"Technical support could be better."

More Devo cons

"I hope they address the pricing model for Logsign Next-Gen SIEM, especially regarding regional variations. The pricing should not differ based on the country of operation as it can lead to dissatisfaction among customers. A fixed pricing structure would be more favorable for us. I would also suggest enhancing the GUI interface and adding features similar to xFi Exchange from IBM Pure. This would streamline operations and save time for analysts."

"AI and machine learning need to be developed. If they develop those features, I think everything will be fine."

"Improvements needed in Logsign SIEM are providing specific security alerts that can be filtered and configured more effectively."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Devo was very cost-competitive... Devo did come with that 400 days of hot data, and that was not the case with other products."

"I like the pricing very much. They keep it simple. It is a single price based on data ingested, and they do it on an average. If you get a spike of data that flows in, they will not stick it to you or charge you for that. They are very fair about that."

"Pricing is based on the number of gigabytes of ingestion by volume, and it's on a 30-day average. If you go over one day, that's not a big deal as long as the average is what you expected it to be."

"The way Devo prices things is based on the amount of data, and I wish the tiers had more granularity. Maybe at this point they do, but when we first negotiated with them, there were only three or four tiers."

"It's a per gigabyte cost for ingestion of data. For every gigabyte that you ingest, it's whatever you negotiated your price for. Compared to other contracts that we've had for cloud providers, it's significantly less."

"Be cautious of metadata inclusion for log types in pricing, as there are some "gotchas" with that."

"We have an OEM agreement with Devo. It is very similar to the standard licensing agreement because we are charged in the same way as any other customer, e.g., we use the backroom."

"[Devo was] in the ballpark with at least a couple of the other front-runners that we were looking at. Devo is a good value and, given the quality of the product, I would expect to pay more."

More Devo pricing and cost advice

"Compared to other SIEMs, it has low pricing."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,877 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Construction Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

12%

Comms Service Provider

12%

University

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	12

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Devo?

The pricing of the product is reasonable if we compare it with other Gartner leading products like Splunk, LogRhythm, Microsoft Sentinel, Google SecOps. Its licensing model is basically on per-day ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Devo?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Devo?

I am using Devo myself. Basically, I work at an MSSP, and we provide services to the organization for Security Operation Centers. In our Security Operation Center, we provide the service of SIEM vi...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Devo

Compared 8% of the time

LogRhythm SIEM vs Devo

Compared 7% of the time

New Relic vs Devo

Compared 4% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs Devo

Compared 3% of the time

Microsoft Sentinel vs Devo

Compared 3% of the time

More Devo Competitors

Fluency vs Logsign Next-Gen SIEM

Compared 12% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Logsign Next-Gen SIEM

Compared 11% of the time

Wazuh vs Logsign Next-Gen SIEM

Compared 9% of the time

Falcon LogScale vs Logsign Next-Gen SIEM

Compared 4% of the time

Sematext Logs vs Logsign Next-Gen SIEM

Compared 4% of the time

More Logsign Next-Gen SIEM Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Devo

August 2026

Download Devo product report

Buyer's Guide

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

August 2026

Download Logsign Next-Gen SIEM product report

Overview

Devo offers powerful visual analytics, real-time data querying, and log integration capabilities within a cloud-native, multi-tenant architecture, supporting extended data retention ideal for long-term analysis and compliance.

Devo is recognized for its Activeboards, which facilitate visual analytics. High-speed search capabilities and real-time analytics enable efficient data manipulation and querying. Its multi-tenant architecture supports effective data segregation and customization tailored to distinct business needs, enhancing its value for handling complex log integrations. With extended data retention of 400 days and a cloud-native architecture, Devo is a robust platform for long-term analysis and compliance requirements. Though opportunities exist to improve browser stability on large searches, SOAR integrations, and its parser capabilities, Devo remains essential for incident response and security monitoring, offering centralized data storage and analysis.

What are Devo's most important features?

Activeboards: Facilitate visual analytics and data exploration.
High-Speed Search: Enables fast data querying and manipulation.
Real-Time Analytics: Supports instant insights and decision-making.
Multi-Tenant Architecture: Allows effective data segregation and customization.
Extended Data Retention: Offers 400-day log retention for compliance and analysis.
Complex Log Integration: Handles intricate data sources effortlessly.

What benefits and ROI should organizations look for in reviews?

Visual Insights: Enhance understanding through interactive dashboards.
Performance Efficiency: Saves time with high-speed data search and real-time results.
Customization Flexibility: Fits specific business requirements with multi-tenant architecture.
Long-Term Compliance: Ensures alignment with extended data retention needs.
Centralized Monitoring: Enables comprehensive incident response and security monitoring.

Devo is extensively used in industries focused on incident response and digital forensics, centralizing data for security monitoring across hybrid environments. Organizations benefit from its ability to store and analyze aggregated logs, creating alerts and dashboards to enhance visibility for network and endpoint activities in multi-domain settings.

Devo

Logsign Next-Gen SIEM offers advanced cybersecurity capabilities with its rich use case flexibility, providing invaluable support in threat detection and response strategies.

Logsign Next-Gen SIEM delivers robust data analytics and security automation for efficient threat detection and incident management. It is designed to seamlessly integrate with existing infrastructure, ensuring comprehensive security intelligence. This next-generation security information and event management enhances operational efficiency by rapidly analyzing large volumes of data and automating incident responses, making it an essential tool for IT security teams.

What are the standout features of Logsign Next-Gen SIEM?

Advanced Threat Detection: Utilizes machine learning to identify potential threats in real time.
Scalable Architecture: Supports dynamic environments with scalable solution offerings.
Security Automation: Automates routine tasks to enhance operational efficiency.
Comprehensive Reporting: Delivers detailed, customizable reports for better decision-making.
Seamless Integration: Easily integrates with existing systems for more unified operations.

What benefits and ROI should you consider?

Improved Security Posture: Significant reduction in threat response times enhances overall security.
Cost-Effective Operations: Reduces operational costs through automation capabilities.
Enhanced Efficiency: Streamlines processes and resource allocation.
Actionable Insights: Provides critical data analytics for informed decision-making.

Implemented widely across industries such as finance and healthcare, Logsign Next-Gen SIEM provides specialized solutions catering to high-volume transactional environments and sensitive data management. Its deployment in critical sectors ensures compliance with industry standards and regulatory requirements, making it a trusted choice for organizations aiming for heightened security measures.

Logsign

Sample Customers

United States Air Force, Rubrik, SentinelOne, Critical Start, NHL, Panda Security, Telefonica, CaixaBank, OpenText, IGT, OneMain Financial, SurveyMonkey, FanDuel, H&R Block, Ulta Beauty, Manulife, Moneylion, Chime Bank, Magna International, American Express Global Business Travel

Turkish Petroleum, Tırsan, DP World, SAC American Colleges, Robert College, Unlu&Co, UniCo Insurance Company, ETSTur, CK Energy, UEDAS Energy, Wilo, Eurocross Assistance, Deloitte Turkey, Incı GS Yuasa, Pappara, Bilgi University, Anadolu University, İstanbul University, The Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources, TRT, Anadolu Media Agency, Ministry of Family, Labour and Social Services, Ispark, Spor AS and wide range of enterprises in different industries.

Buyer's Guide

Devo vs. Logsign Next-Gen SIEM

August 2026

Free Report: Devo vs. Logsign Next-Gen SIEM

Find out what your peers are saying about Devo vs. Logsign Next-Gen SIEM and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,877 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Devo vs. Logsign Next-Gen SIEM report.

See our list of best Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) vendors and best Log Management vendors.

We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.