We changed our name from IT Central Station: Here's why

Denodo vs Mule Anypoint Platform comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Denodo Logo
9,344 views|6,803 comparisons
Mule Anypoint Platform Logo
19,940 views|14,773 comparisons
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Denodo vs. Mule Anypoint Platform and other solutions. Updated: January 2022.
565,304 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Denodo makes it easy to export data as a service or data link to other services.""Access to numerous forums and internet information.""The performance and the speed to market are the most valuable features of this solution.""Overall, the product works quite well and has a good set of features.""It allows a lot of traceability and you can decide what data you want to collect""The most valuable feature is the performance. Denodo is very useful, especially in this huge pharma environment. I've found that older SAP solutions were very tightly coupled to each other, which resulted in data restrictions. Getting data from different sources was tough and tedious. Compared to these old solutions, Denodo is very easy to work with for the analytical team. Now that we've implemented this virtualization layer, we are capable of getting the data very smoothly. We implemented a very small unit, but the performance and integration have been very good.""The most valuable features are data lineage and the concept of a semantic layer.""The most valuable feature is Data Catalogs."

More Denodo Pros →

"I have found several things most valuable, including its very quick implementation that you can use a lot of out of the box templates, and lastly that it is a very mature product, especially in hybrid integration.""Customers can make use of Runtime Fabric, an RTF environment.""API management.""This is a good platform for designing, flowing out APIs, and then doing API-based integrations.""The API toolkit is the solution's most valuable aspect at this time, for our organization.""It is very easy to use for building connectors. It comes with a lot of connectors. For example, it has different adapters for NetSuite, which are very easy to use. It also has Salesforce connectors. The object store feature is also really easy to use. Mule Anypoint Platform is also good in terms of performance and how it is managed behind the scenes.""The monitoring capabilities of this product are very good because of the feedback it supplies in statistics.""Mule Anypoint Platform is our preferred platform for integration."

More Mule Anypoint Platform Pros →

Cons
"There have been some issues when you are at a table. Currently, Denodo exports data sets for a tabular model. When you are finished modeling your database or data warehouse they export a link to be used in Tableau. They should support other tools like Power BI.""We occasionally have some integration issues that we need to work through.""Denodo's training documentation could be improved by providing more material. From an administrative standpoint, I've found that only Denodo websites provide the usual tutorials. It may be because it's a bit of a restricted tool, but it results in trouble with learning. Normally, I can find help and solutions from other sources, but I haven't been able to find any for Denodo. Other that, it's fine and it performs well. I only have six months of experience, so I can't accurately suggest improvements.""Documentation needs to be improved""The dropdown menus feel antiquated to me, and the administrative portals need improvement.""Lacks integrations with AWS, GCP and the like.""The integration could use improvement, it's a lot of non-speed line processes that we have discovered, in the country. The configurations could use a lot more improvement.""The support is not the best and should be improved."

More Denodo Cons →

"Its documentation needed a little bit of work to make it more usable. It is a platform that is used mainly by developers and other people for connecting systems. Its documentation was confusing in some areas and was not very helpful in other areas. I had to go to a consultant to get some work done, which ideally shouldn't be required.""Mule Anypoint Platform could improve by having more up-to-date adapters to do work in a digital space.""It has different types of subscriptions. For platinum or lower subscriptions, there are not too many things that can be done. We don't see many features. They should release a basic version that has logging and monitoring features. These features should come with Mule Anypoint Platform for free instead of making customers pay separately for these features. Its dashboard can be improved to have a lot of charts so that it is easy to visualize information. The utilization part can be improved. The dashboard is good currently, but it can be better. Other solutions like Elastic have a good dashboard, and they allow you to administer the product from the UI. Currently, for RTF, there is a different dashboard or utility. It would be good to include the same utility in the cloud solution. It would be good if there is a centralized repository that includes the links to the information about various troubleshooting issues. The documentation is there currently, and it is good, but the troubleshooting information is too scattered. We have to go to different links to find troubleshooting information. This kind of centralized repository would be helpful for new customers who are implementing this solution. It will be helpful to see different kinds of issues that can occur.""Pricing is one aspect of the solution that is troublesome. It's too expensive for smaller organizations.""The terms of use and how it's priced has become very difficult to manage, which is forcing us to look for alternatives already - and we haven't even been using it for that long just yet.""It doesn't work well when you try using it for the processing layer.""The solution is very expensive. They need to work on the pricing.""An on-premise setup requires special skills and you need a lot of professional services."

More Mule Anypoint Platform Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "I don't know the actual cost, but it's tens of thousands of dollars per month."
  • "The licensing should be improved, as the cost per connector is quite expensive."
  • More Denodo Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Mule is not the cheapest integration platform out there, but it deserves the price we are paying."
  • "The product comes complete at one set price including support."
  • More Mule Anypoint Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.
    565,304 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer: 
    The most valuable feature is the performance. Denodo is very useful, especially in this huge pharma environment. I've found that older SAP solutions were very tightly coupled to each other, which… more »
    Top Answer: 
    The licensing should be improved, as the cost per connector is quite expensive.
    Top Answer: 
    Denodo's training documentation could be improved by providing more material. From an administrative standpoint, I've found that only Denodo websites provide the usual tutorials. It may be because… more »
    Top Answer: 
    I architected solutions using Oracle SOA/OSB, Spring Boot, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform on cloud / on-premises and hybrid modes; What I see is though if you are an enterprise and have enough money… more »
    Top Answer: 
    Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether TIBCO BusinessWorks or Mule Anypoint platform integration and connectivity software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Mule… more »
    Top Answer: 
    We are very satisfied with the DevOps support.
    Ranking
    4th
    Views
    9,344
    Comparisons
    6,803
    Reviews
    7
    Average Words per Review
    446
    Rating
    7.7
    1st
    Views
    19,940
    Comparisons
    14,773
    Reviews
    12
    Average Words per Review
    557
    Rating
    7.8
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Data Integrator
    Learn More
    Overview

    Denodo operates in the data virtualization field– providing high performance, unified access to the broadest range of enterprise, big data, cloud and unstructured sources, and the most agile data services provisioning and governance – at less than half the cost of traditional data integration. Denodo’s customers have gained significant business agility and ROI by creating a unified virtual data layer that serves strategic enterprise-wide information needs for agile BI, big data analytics, web and cloud integration, single-view applications, and SOA data services across every major industry

    Denodo Platform offers the broadest access to structured and unstructured data residing in enterprise, big data, and cloud sources, in both batch and real-time, exceeding the performance needs of data-intensive organizations for both analytical and operational use cases, delivered in a much shorter timeframe than traditional data integration tools.

    The Denodo Platform drives agility, faster time to market, increased customer engagement from single view of customer and operational efficiencies from real-time business intelligence and self-serviceability.
    Founded in 1999, Denodo is privately held, with main offices in Palo Alto (CA), Madrid (Spain), Munich (Germany) and London (UK).

    With connectivity, composability, and control, Anypoint Platform solves the most challenging connectivity problems across SOA, SaaS, and APIs. It's a unified, highly productive, hybrid integration platform that creates an application network of apps, data and devices with API-led connectivity.

    Offer
    Learn more about Denodo
    Learn more about Mule Anypoint Platform
    Sample Customers
    Autodesk, VHA, AAA, Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Bank, Caterpillar, European Chemical Agency, Seagate, Nationwide, Time Warner Cable, Pantex, Inditex, BNSF Railways, Vodafone, CIT Group, Jazztel, Wolters Kluwer, Telefonica, TransAlta
    VMware, Gucci, MasterCard, Target, Time Inc, Hershey's, Tesla, Spotify, Office Depot, Intuit, CBS, Amtrak, Salesforce, Gap, Ralph Lauren
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company25%
    Comms Service Provider13%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company37%
    Comms Service Provider13%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Energy/Utilities Company6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business64%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise18%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise28%
    Large Enterprise50%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise63%
    Find out what your peers are saying about Denodo vs. Mule Anypoint Platform and other solutions. Updated: January 2022.
    565,304 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Denodo is ranked 4th in Cloud Data Integration with 8 reviews while Mule Anypoint Platform is ranked 1st in Cloud Data Integration with 13 reviews. Denodo is rated 7.6, while Mule Anypoint Platform is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Denodo writes "Good performance and integration, but needs more training documentation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mule Anypoint Platform writes "Constantly improving to help connect applications, data, and devices". Denodo is most compared with Azure Data Factory, Informatica PowerCenter, Delphix, Informatica Enterprise Data Catalog and AWS Glue, whereas Mule Anypoint Platform is most compared with TIBCO BusinessWorks, SAP Process Orchestration, Oracle Integration Cloud Service and Mule ESB. See our Denodo vs. Mule Anypoint Platform report.

    See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

    We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.