

Find out in this report how the two Data Management Platforms (DMP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
This reduction in both time and money resulted in real-time impact and significant cost savings.
For a lot of different tasks, including machine learning, it is a nice solution.
When it comes to big data processing, I prefer Databricks over other solutions.
With traditional development requiring many specialized roles, Palantir Foundry allows us to operate efficiently with fewer personnel.
We saved approximately 20 to 35 percent in man-hours needed and the timing improved our project timelines by approximately 50 to 55 percent.
One clear example was the pipeline optimization I mentioned, where we reduced execution time by thirty to forty percent.
Whenever we reach out, they respond promptly.
As of now, we are raising issues and they are providing solutions without any problems.
I would give Databricks customer support a rating of ten.
They are knowledgeable, and their boot camps demonstrate solutions in just three days, which typically takes months or years.
When I seek help regarding code in Slate, it can take considerable time for the team to find the right answer or documentation, especially since the responses depend on the level of support provided, and specific queries regarding coding usually require reaching out to more experienced developers.
The support staff are extremely knowledgeable and good at what they are doing.
The sky's the limit with Databricks.
The patches have sometimes caused issues leading to our jobs being paused for about six hours.
Databricks is an easily scalable platform.
We work with large volumes of healthcare data, and it has been able to handle all the large-scale ingestion, transformation, and distributed processing workflows effectively.
For scalability, I would rate it ten out of ten because you have a lot of flexibility.
Regarding scalability, if you have billions and trillions of records, Palantir Foundry accommodates ETL pipelines with a dedicated compute profile.
They release patches that sometimes break our code.
Although it is too early to definitively state the platform's stability, we have not encountered any issues so far.
Databricks is definitely a very stable product and reliable.
Live data streaming is very hard and it keeps breaking, so it is not very stable and depends a lot on the satellite network.
I get more technical support from Palantir.
Palantir Foundry has been a stable and reliable enterprise platform.
Adjusting features like worker nodes and node utilization during cluster creation could mitigate these failures.
We prefer using a small to mid-sized cluster for many jobs to keep costs low, but this sometimes doesn't support our operations properly.
We use MLflow for managing MLOps, however, further improvement would be beneficial, especially for large language models and related tools.
The platform is extremely capable, but improvements around usability, debugging experience, DevOps flexibility, and ecosystem openness would make it even more effective for enterprise engineering teams.
I want to build conversational BI or conversational agents quickly that can connect to MCPs, and other MCPs that I can communicate with in Palantir Foundry, which are areas to advance forward.
An improvement would be that in case of any changes done by the Palantir team, those changes need to be tested thoroughly so there are no downstream impacts, ensuring that the business is not affected by any modifications in the system.
It is not a cheap solution.
I believe that in terms of credits for Databricks, we're spending between £15,000 and £20,000 a month.
My experience with pricing, implementation costs, and licensing is that it is very efficient and very fast.
Its high initial pricing can be intimidating, but it becomes cost-effective as it reduces the need for a development team.
In terms of getting a contractor to work on that, I would probably say it is more expensive because there are fewer people with that skillset compared to, say, Databricks or Azure.
We can consult it in the right way regarding Palantir Foundry use, as it is still a gray area right now concerning costing.
Databricks' capability to process data in parallel enhances data processing speed.
The platform allows us to leverage cloud advantages effectively, enhancing our AI and ML projects.
The Unity Catalog is for data governance, and the Delta Lake is to build the lakehouse.
The predictive analytics capability within Palantir Foundry impacts financial forecasting strategies through its AIP functionality, which includes numerous pre-built models, LLMs, and data science application libraries.
The main advantage is you can decentralize the analytics, and you will have everything in one place, so that you do not need to rely on multiple departments working on different tools.
The low-code solutions made our lives easier because not everybody is too technical to get started and the barrier to entry is very low.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Palantir Foundry | 13.5% |
| Databricks | 6.8% |
| Other | 79.7% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 27 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 12 |
| Large Enterprise | 57 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 11 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 7 |
| Large Enterprise | 49 |
Databricks offers a scalable, versatile platform that integrates seamlessly with Spark and multiple languages, supporting data engineering, machine learning, and analytics in a unified environment.
Databricks stands out for its scalability, ease of use, and powerful integration with Spark, multiple languages, and leading cloud services like Azure and AWS. It provides tools such as the Notebook for collaboration, Delta Lake for efficient data management, and Unity Catalog for data governance. While enhancing data engineering and machine learning workflows, it faces challenges in visualization and third-party integration, with pricing and user interface navigation being common concerns. Despite needing improvements in connectivity and documentation, it remains popular for tasks like real-time processing and data pipeline management.
What features make Databricks unique?
What benefits can users expect from Databricks?
In the tech industry, Databricks empowers teams to perform comprehensive data analytics, enabling them to conduct extensive ETL operations, run predictive modeling, and prepare data for SparkML. In retail, it supports real-time data processing and batch streaming, aiding in better decision-making. Enterprises across sectors leverage its capabilities for creating secure APIs and managing data lakes effectively.
Palantir Foundry offers intuitive data management and application development, prioritizing accessibility through low-code/no-code tools, enabling users to integrate, analyze, and collaborate efficiently.
Palantir Foundry centers on user accessibility, data governance, and real-time capabilities, streamlining processes with low-code/no-code development. It supports comprehensive data analysis and integration, enhanced by digital twin features that align virtual and physical interactions. Despite high costs and performance challenges with large datasets, it remains a prime choice for sectors needing structured and unstructured data integration. Key areas include robust data security, lineage tracking, and predictive analytics, promoted through a unified management platform adaptable to diverse needs.
What are the key features of Palantir Foundry?In manufacturing, Palantir Foundry aids in engineering pipeline models and semantic frameworks, while utilities utilize its analytics to enhance service delivery. Insurance firms leverage its capability to assess and predict customer behavior. Throughout these industries, Foundry integrates across cloud environments, bridging structured and unstructured data from various sources.
We monitor all Data Management Platforms (DMP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.