"The reporting capabilities are very good."
"The most valuable feature for us is the zero-day."
"The best thing about the tool is that its backend team is pretty good and has a strong engineering team."
"ZeroFOX has no language limitations. It can detect many languages."
"The reporting process requires significant improvement as it often takes longer than expected and the quality is lacking."
"The product must provide consultancy for initial setup."
"ZeroFOX is not configured to grab the information automatically, including the news."
"Social media takedowns are a major issue. The takedowns should not take more than two to three hours."
Cymulate is ranked 14th in Threat Intelligence Platforms with 2 reviews while ZeroFOX is ranked 2nd in Digital Risk Protection with 2 reviews. Cymulate is rated 9.0, while ZeroFOX is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Cymulate writes "An affordable solution that improves an organization’s security posture and provides excellent reporting capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ZeroFOX writes "Provides information on leaks in the dark web, the deep web, and credit cards". Cymulate is most compared with Pentera, Picus Security, XM Cyber, SafeBreach and AttackIQ, whereas ZeroFOX is most compared with Recorded Future, PhishLabs Platform, Digital Shadows, Group-IB Digital Risk Protection and Cybersixgill .
See our list of best Digital Risk Protection vendors.
We monitor all Digital Risk Protection reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
