Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs EclecticIQ comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Cybereason Endpoint Detecti...
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
37th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
19
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (44th)
EclecticIQ
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
77th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Threat Intelligence Platforms (34th), Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (29th)
 

Featured Reviews

JB
Dec 21, 2021
It has helped us become more knowledgeable about our environment and aware of threats
Cybereason's threat hunting and investigation are the most valuable features. Threat hunting is a user-friendly feature that keeps you safe. Investigation offers an added value that I haven't seen with other EDR services. It allows you to find specific policy problems within your environment. I would give the dashboards a perfect 10 out of ten for ease of use. The interface is intuitive, with excellent menus. You can view the data in different ways and customize it fairly easily. There is always a learning curve with any IT solution, but this one is pretty user-friendly, and you can learn it quickly. Cybereason gives us real-time visibility of an entire malicious operation from the root cause to all affected endpoints. It's an excellent way to visualize the timeline, see what's involved, find out what's happening, and learn what kind of connections or processes are running. I think that's if I'm ever shopping for another solution, that would be a must-have.
Use EclecticIQ?
Share your opinion

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Though it is not the cheapest solution but it fits our budget. We pay an annual licensing fee."
"We considered a few other solutions. Some were ridiculously overpriced, while others didn't have solutions for Mac endpoints. That was a deal-breaker because most of our organization is on Mac. It came down to two vendors: Cybereason and another. They had similar pitches and almost identical approaches, but in the end, Cybereason gave us the best value for our money."
"In terms of cost, this is a good choice for our needs."
"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the pricing an eight."
"The pricing is manageable."
"In terms of pricing, it's a good solution."
"I do not have experience with the licensing of the product."
"This product is somewhat expensive and should be cheaper."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.
793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
18%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
6%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response?
Comparison with other products showed it be cheaper than some larger competitors. Set up cost for us were cheaper as we already had users experienced with the product in other business units. Initi...
What is your primary use case for Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response?
We use Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response to scan and detect unusual processes and malicious files on the endpoint.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

Cybereason EDR, Cybereason Deep Detect & Respond
No data available
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Lockheed Martin, Spark Capital, DocuSign, Softbank Capital
Cambridge Intelligence
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, SentinelOne, CrowdStrike and others in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR). Updated: July 2024.
793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.