CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla vs Microsoft Entra Workload ID comparison

CyberArk and Microsoft are both solutions in the Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) category. CyberArk is ranked #18 with an average rating of 8.5, while Microsoft is ranked #21 with an average rating of 8.0. CyberArk holds a 1.5% mindshare in IAMS, compared to Microsoft’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of CyberArk users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla

Read 6 CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla reviews

1,582 Views
759 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Entra Workload ID

Read 3 Microsoft Entra Workload ID reviews

574 Views
402 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla

Microsoft Entra Workload ID

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 4, 2026

CyberArk IGA and Microsoft Entra Workload ID are competitive solutions in identity governance. Microsoft Entra appears to have the upper hand due to its advanced features and broader capabilities, justifying a higher cost.

Features: CyberArk IGA focuses on security and user data administration, offering robust identity governance, comprehensive oversight, detailed compliance tracking, and automation. Microsoft Entra Workload ID provides advanced access management, seamless integration with Microsoft ecosystems, multifactor authentication, and simplified administration.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CyberArk IGA features a flexible deployment model with strong customer support for setup and maintenance. Microsoft Entra Workload ID, benefiting from Microsoft ecosystem integration, offers straightforward deployment for existing Microsoft users. Although CyberArk provides valuable support, Microsoft Entra's integrated tools make deployment generally easier.

Pricing and ROI: CyberArk IGA is competitively priced, focusing on maximizing ROI through effective governance. Microsoft Entra Workload ID, with a higher initial cost, delivers ROI by enhancing productivity and security for Microsoft-based infrastructures. CyberArk offers cost-effective governance, while Microsoft Entra provides a comprehensive package for integration needs.

To learn more, read our detailed CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla vs. Microsoft Entra Workload ID Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla vs. Microsoft Entra Workload ID

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,311 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla

Ranking in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

18th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Identity Management (IM) (16th), Identity Governance Administration (IGA) (6th)

Microsoft Entra Workload ID

Ranking in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

21st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

4.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Microsoft Security Suite (31st)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) category, the mindshare of CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla is 1.5%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Entra Workload ID is 0.7%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla	1.5%
Microsoft Entra Workload ID	0.7%
Other	97.8%

Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

Featured Reviews

Ebin_Abraham

Data Engineer at Baker Hughes

Automated access reviews have reduced hidden bot risks and create audit evidence seamlessly

CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla's access reviews, audit report generation, and compliance features are excellent. It creates audit and compliance evidence easily, which previously required substantial manual effort, but now the process has become very straightforward. The best feature is definitely the AI component, which includes evidence generation for audit and compliance, addressing one of our biggest challenges. We are able to easily gather all the details required by the audit team, and that is one of the best aspects. Additionally, being cloud-based means it is very easy to scale up without much downtime compared to our previous on-premises solution. CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla has positively impacted our organization by significantly reducing manual effort. We previously had many unnoticed non-human accounts that we could not deactivate due to their large number, but now that timeframe has drastically decreased, which is one of the greatest advantages. The AI-driven access reviews and automatic generation of compliance and audit documents are among the best features.

Read full review

reviewer2772159

Postdoctoral Researcher at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Have experienced ongoing challenges integrating with existing workflows despite strong foundational capabilities

I don't know how I would assess the impact of AI-powered threat detection for us. It has helped with security operations in general; I'm being very cagey here, Damian. You can understand why. Where I work, there is a directory services team. There is a security team. The security team may have several different departments in there. I think they are behind the times. That's about as far as what I would say. We may have the modern firewalls and detections and all the rest of it, but I think from a modern way of working, which the identity is a user which is any device, any place, anywhere, from anything, okay, securely, they're not quite up with that concept, in my opinion. The review rating is 8.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"After implementing CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla, it puts the organization at a very high security level by reducing risk and threats to platforms."

"CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla's access reviews, audit report generation, and compliance features are excellent."

"We had these spreadsheets all over the place, but now we have a library of evidence to consult when needed. Zilla keeps everything in one place. It's not scattered all over anymore."

"I enjoy the ease of setup and creation of a review. Being a user of the tool or kind of an admin of the tool, the ease of setup of an access review is valuable."

"CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla is a very stable product, and I do not see a lot of issues with it most of the time."

"It helps users work from anywhere, regardless of their location or country. Users do not need to be in their office geo-location to access applications or resources, which provides flexibility for accessing applications wherever they are."

"We have various options available with Microsoft Entra, such as B2B cross-tenant guest member accesses, and we can invite users and perform activities from that area, while we are also dealing with Azure IaaS, infrastructure as a service, which has different IAM platforms existing with resources or subscriptions."

"I would evaluate the customer service or technical support with Microsoft for Entra products as well; we are a strategic partner, so we're one of 500 companies that can talk to them directly."

"The product enables organizations to synchronize users to Microsoft 365 products."

"I would evaluate the customer service or technical support with Microsoft for Entra products as well; we are a strategic partner, so we're one of 500 companies that can talk to them directly."

Cons

"Improvement suggestions for CyberArk include addressing the on-premises deployment processes, which require a very skilled engineer to handle because of the complexity of the environments involved."

"Maybe this is coming with their AI module, but I would like to see a feature that performs baseline analysis of permissions that may not fit into a role, and it attempts to group them into a role. We've run into problems with applications where someone has not created a role but assigned ad hoc permissions to a user. We still need to do some manual work to identify the group that the user belongs to. It would be amazing to have Zilla streamline that."

"There is still no automated way to de-provision access as a result of a review, but they are getting there in terms of making it unified. They are getting closer to that."

"For improvement, I would suggest enhancing the reporting functionality of CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla, as it could benefit from more customization or advanced filtering for auditing purposes."

"The primary issue I have experienced with CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla is related to support."

"CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla is lacking in the governance side of identities compared to competitors."

"Integration with existing IAM solutions has not helped our identity management processes; it's all of the things that are in front of Directory and Entra, such as SalePoint and other toolsets, give us one of the worst identity experiences I think I've ever come across, which is why I'm trying to change it."

"Integration with other products must be made easier."

"In my opinion, Microsoft Entra Workload ID can be improved in several ways."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It has been fair because we have been in from the beginning or close to the beginning. I know it is not truly an identity access management system yet, but its price was one of the appealing factors for us to purchase it at the time. It was reasonably priced."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Security Firm

20%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Retailer

Insurance Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zilla Security?

It has been fair because we have been in from the beginning or close to the beginning. I know it is not truly an identity access management system yet, but its price was one of the appealing factor...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Zilla Security?

The challenges I face with the implementation of CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla involve legacy applications and legacy systems, which sometimes present issues. Additionally, custom-built APIs that a...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Zilla Security?

The main use cases for CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla include onboarding users when they are being recruited, as well as managing the moving and exiting processes. When a user like James moves from ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Microsoft Entra Workload ID?

The product enables organizations to synchronize users to Microsoft 365 products.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Entra Workload ID?

I rate the pricing a six out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Entra Workload ID?

In my opinion, Microsoft Entra Workload ID can be improved in several ways.Particularly about Microsoft Entra Workload ID, I think they still could improve categorization, which still has some room...

See all answers

Comparisons

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla

Compared 23% of the time

Veza vs CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla

Compared 6% of the time

Omada Identity vs CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla

Compared 5% of the time

Lumos vs CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla

Compared 5% of the time

More CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla Competitors

Microsoft Entra ID vs Microsoft Entra Workload ID

Compared 54% of the time

Google Titan Security Key vs Microsoft Entra Workload ID

Compared 28% of the time

Google Cloud Identity vs Microsoft Entra Workload ID

Compared 18% of the time

More Microsoft Entra Workload ID Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla

March 2026

Download CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla product report

Buyer's Guide

Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

February 2026

Download Microsoft Entra Workload ID product report

Also Known As

Zilla Security

No data available

Overview

CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla is designed to streamline identity governance and administration by automating access controls and compliance processes, enhancing security and efficiency.

Known for its robust capabilities, CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla offers comprehensive identity governance that simplifies policy enforcement and compliance management. It enables organizations to efficiently manage user access, reducing risks and ensuring secure operations. By leveraging automation, it minimizes manual tasks and enhances productivity.

What are the key features?

Automated Access Controls: Reduces the need for manual processes by streamlining access management.
Compliance Management: Facilitates adherence to regulatory standards with built-in compliance features.
Risk Reduction: Identifies and mitigates potential security threats with advanced risk analytics.
Scalability: Supports growth by efficiently handling expanding user bases and increasing security demands.

Which benefits or ROI should users consider?

Enhanced Security: Provides robust protection against unauthorized access.
Improved Efficiency: Automates tasks to save time and resources.
Compliance Assurance: Simplifies the process of meeting regulatory requirements.
Cost-Effectiveness: Reduces expenses associated with manual identity management processes.

CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla is implemented across industries such as finance and healthcare, where regulatory compliance and data protection are critical. It helps organizations enhance their security postures while ensuring compliance with industry standards.

CyberArk

Microsoft Entra Workload ID enhances identity management by providing secure and efficient access control for applications and workloads. It is designed to streamline processes and strengthen security measures, catering to complex IT environments.

Microsoft Entra Workload ID delivers a unified and secure method for managing workload identities across cloud environments. It addresses key challenges in handling access control, ensuring that applications have appropriate permissions without compromising security. Known for its reliability, it assists enterprises in minimizing risks associated with identity mismanagement.

What are the most valuable features of Microsoft Entra Workload ID?

Identity Management: Centralizes control of application identities to simplify monitoring and adjustments.
Access Control: Offers robust access permissions tailored to workload-specific needs, enhancing security.
Policy Enforcement: Ensures consistent application of security policies across multiple environments.

What benefits or ROI can users expect?

Improved Security: Reduces risks associated with identity theft and unauthorized access.
Efficiency Gains: Streamlines identity management tasks, leading to resource optimization.
Scalability: Supports growing needs without compromising performance or security.

Industries such as finance and healthcare have implemented Microsoft Entra Workload ID to strengthen compliance and security in cloud operations. Its features are tailored to meet regulatory standards and protect sensitive data, making it a suitable choice for sectors requiring stringent identity management protocols.

Microsoft

Buyer's Guide

CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla vs. Microsoft Entra Workload ID

March 2026

Free Report: CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla vs. Microsoft Entra Workload ID

Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla vs. Microsoft Entra Workload ID and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla vs. Microsoft Entra Workload ID report.

See our list of best Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.