We performed a comparison between CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault and HashiCorp Vault based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Password Managers solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I love how easily we could operate within Password Vault and get things done. It was almost effortless."
"The most valuable feature is that it is flexible. It has many connectors. that have done well, the EPV and SSH sessions are all being recorded and everything works fine."
"It's a good solution, it works, and the bank is happy with it."
"CyberArk probably has probably the best vault on the market because of the multiple layered security and each password getting its own encryption."
"The PSM is excellent and the ability to write your own connectors and plugins is invaluable as far as flexibility goes."
"The most valuable features of CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault are password vaulting and automatic rotation of passwords after use."
"CyberArk is a good and adaptive solution. It is easy to adopt and install. It is easy for every use case."
"In terms of stability, there are no complaints."
"The tool's dynamic rotation of the password credentials is good."
"The product is free and easy to use. It is well documented with an easy implementation process."
"The most valuable feature of HashiCorp Vault is the management of tickets in the pipeline."
"For me, the most valuable features include that it's easy to manage and maintain the password API for retrieving passwords and other things."
"It is user-friendly and easy to implement from any application point."
"We were using it because we have compliance requirements around secret management. Having a secure vault and encrypting data was an additional requirement. When we looked at it first, we were just looking for a vault, like a lockbox. The greatest benefit of HashiCorp is its ability to manage encryption on the fly. It provides encryption of data at rest, in use, in transit, on the fly, and linked with applications, which was really attractive."
"It can still be configured by a separate team other than developers. That's why I think it's more secure."
"It is a good product to consider for companies who are looking to build on-premise or hybrid infrastructure."
"We require IAM (identify and access management) capability at the administrator level because we need more identification."
"What needs to be improved in CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault is their customer support, particularly in terms of responsiveness, willingness to help, and being more understanding. The initial setup and upgrade process for the solution is complex and can only be done by CyberArk, so this is another area for improvement."
"I would prefer that this is a fully-managed service, rather than have to manage the software ourselves and keep it up to date."
"The initial setup could be simpler but it may not be as effective."
"The interface could be improved it is not user-friendly, but they have improved but it could still improve. In the policies configuration, it would be a benefit to have more details."
"I would like to see more integration with more tools, for more APIs."
"The stability depends on the infrastructure it is installed on, which is important because CyberArk does not have the hardware appliance."
"We should be able to join small components."
"The technical support was hard to get a hold of and lacking in service."
"The solution could be much easier to implement."
"The documentation is very general; it should have more examples and more use cases."
"I don't think there are any major improvements required—so far, so good. However, I think that having more training materials, such as videos, and documentation available would be helpful. I would prefer to have more videos available either on the official site or on YouTube."
"The onboarding is a challenge. It should be more self-service, but it involves reviews and approvals."
"We could use more documentation, primarily to do with integrations."
"The solution's initial setup process is complicated."
"I would like to see better integration of HashiCorp Vault with SAP products."
More CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault Pricing and Cost Advice →
CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault is ranked 4th in Enterprise Password Managers with 47 reviews while HashiCorp Vault is ranked 2nd in Enterprise Password Managers with 15 reviews. CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault is rated 8.4, while HashiCorp Vault is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault writes "Helps to store system accounts ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of HashiCorp Vault writes "Easy to manage and maintain the password API but stability could be improved". CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault is most compared with Azure Key Vault, AWS Secrets Manager, Delinea Secret Server, BeyondTrust Password Safe and LastPass, whereas HashiCorp Vault is most compared with Azure Key Vault, AWS Secrets Manager, Delinea Secret Server, Keeper and BeyondTrust Password Safe. See our CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault vs. HashiCorp Vault report.
See our list of best Enterprise Password Managers vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Password Managers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
