We performed a comparison between CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager and Fortinet FortiAuthenticator based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, Delinea, BeyondTrust and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM)."Users can scale the solution."
"The department management aspect of the solution is the most valuable aspect."
"The most valuable feature of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is its high performance, it's the best identity security platform. The security is good. It's easy to showcase the feature and capabilities and compare it with other competitors. It competes well with other solutions. Additionally, it is a complete solution."
"You can use it to strip users of their local admin rights and, at the same time, elevate applications for them."
"CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager (EPM) 's most valuable feature is its ability to manage user application privileges and protect against ransomware attacks by controlling access to specific files and applications."
"We can do both server and endpoint protection."
"What sets CyberArk apart is its continuous innovation, staying ahead of the competition."
"The most valuable feature is that their database is completely encrypted and protected with multiple layers."
"The product is stable and reliable."
"The most valuable features are the performance and ease of use."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is RADIUS service and the social network integration feature."
"The solution's most valuable aspect is that it easy to install. The user experience is very good."
"This is a scalable product."
"The product’s most valuable feature is integration with FortiGate, FortiToken, FortiTalk, and multi-factor authentication."
"The most valuable features of Fortinet FortiAuthenticator are easy to configure, secure, and the application has good performance."
"Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is an easy-to-use solution."
"The solution is very expensive."
"CyberArk meets clients' need very spot-on. It covers everything customers ask for. As for improvements, honestly, the feedback's been really positive. I haven't heard any specific areas that need work."
"It's an old product and has many areas that can be improved."
"Performance could be better. We have a couple of problems with CyberArk right now. One of the problems is performance in our environment. Support also takes a long time to respond. If the user already has local admin rights, then I can't collect any events in the console from this device. There are also some options in CyberArk that are not working properly, and are not helpful in this case. I can't collect any information to create a proper policy for the device. I have to investigate everything manually, or even disable the local admin from the device. I can collect the events only after this, and it's very time consuming. In my case, it's a waste of resources."
"The solution can be complex to use at times."
"Compared to other tools like Linux, this solution isn't as user-friendly."
"The installation process is pretty difficult."
"CyberArk is a pretty heavy solution."
"There are multiple areas that are in need of improvement. It is not a mature product."
"It would be helpful to receive a code by yourself for authentication instead of it registered to a phone."
"I would like to see more security features in reference to identity login or identity identification."
"The GUI is on the older side but I'm sure that it will be upgraded soon. It works, but it looks a little dated."
"I would like to see some email options for Fortinet FortiAuthenticator."
"Integration with FortiGate could be more fluid."
"The user interface and clustering are areas with shortcomings that need improvement."
"Improvements in the product could start from the dashboard, overall customization, and configuration."
More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is ranked 6th in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 26 reviews while Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is ranked 5th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 52 reviews. CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is rated 8.0, while Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager writes "Offers integrated solutions and expands its capabilities through strategic acquisitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Fortinet FortiAuthenticator writes "A reasonably priced solution that can be scaled toward different functionalities and offers flexible SMS messaging". CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management, CrowdStrike Falcon, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and Tanium, whereas Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Fortinet FortiToken, Fortinet FortiNAC, Microsoft Entra ID and Cisco Duo.
We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.