CrossBrowserTesting vs Zeenyx AscentialTest comparison

SmartBear and Zeenyx are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. SmartBear is ranked #26, while Zeenyx is ranked #17 with an average rating of 10.0. SmartBear holds a 1.6% mindshare in FT, compared to Zeenyx’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of SmartBear users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Zeenyx users who would recommend it.

CrossBrowserTesting

Read 19 CrossBrowserTesting reviews

1,008 Views
877 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Zeenyx AscentialTest

Read 13 Zeenyx AscentialTest reviews

1,101 Views
815 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

CrossBrowserTesting

Zeenyx AscentialTest

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Zeenyx AscentialTest and CrossBrowserTesting compete in the software testing domain. Zeenyx AscentialTest has an advantage in pricing and support, while CrossBrowserTesting stands out for its robust feature set.

Features: Zeenyx AscentialTest is renowned for automation capabilities, scriptless testing, and test maintenance. It allows creation of application objects through snapshots, integrates Subversion for versioning, and utilizes the TestSet feature for test execution. CrossBrowserTesting provides extensive cross-browser compatibility, real device testing, and performance diagnostics. It includes Screenshot and Screen Recording tools to aid in browser-specific testing scenarios, offering a comprehensive range of environments.

Room for Improvement: Zeenyx AscentialTest could enhance its interface for more intuitive navigation and integration options with popular tools. Expanding cloud capabilities and introducing more third-party integrations would be beneficial. CrossBrowserTesting might improve its live testing speed and device selection availability. Additional support for complex test scenarios and real-time troubleshooting could optimize its service. Introducing more advanced analytics and reporting could enrich user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Zeenyx AscentialTest supports on-premise deployment, appealing to those preferring controlled environments. It offers strong customer support. CrossBrowserTesting is cloud-based, allowing easy access with minimal setup. It provides responsive support through multiple channels, facilitating quick resolution of issues.

Pricing and ROI: Zeenyx AscentialTest offers a cost-effective solution with straightforward ROI through competitive pricing and lower setup costs. It is appealing to budget-conscious teams. Despite a higher price, CrossBrowserTesting justifies its cost with extensive features and long-term benefits in testing efficiency and coverage. Its higher initial investment can lead to significant returns for broader test scenarios.

To learn more, read our detailed CrossBrowserTesting vs. Zeenyx AscentialTest Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

CrossBrowserTesting vs. Zeenyx AscentialTest

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CrossBrowserTesting

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

26th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Zeenyx AscentialTest

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

17th

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Management Tools (12th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of CrossBrowserTesting is 1.6%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zeenyx AscentialTest is 1.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Zeenyx AscentialTest	1.4%
CrossBrowserTesting	1.6%
Other	97.0%

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

CharlesNetshivhera

Senior DevOps Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Knowledgeable support, scalable, and stable

We use CrossBrowserTesting for testing our web-based applications We had some issues with the onboarding process and the cloud conductivity could improve. I have used CrossBrowserTesting within the past 12 months. CrossBrowserTesting is stable. I have found CrossBrowserTesting to be scalable.…

Read full review

Tobias Roth

Software developer at Weiss GmbH Softwarelösungen

Robust automation with reusable steps and seamless integration

The concept of reusable steps in Zeenyx AscentialTest has significantly enhanced our test automation efficiency. Encapsulating common actions into modular steps reduces redundancy in test scripts and ensures consistency across scenarios. This approach streamlines maintenance efforts, allowing updates to be applied universally, making our test suite more agile and adaptable to evolving project requirements. The concept of reusable steps is a key factor in maximizing reusability and maintainability in our test automation strategy. AscentialTest's object recognition in snapshots is a robust feature that goes beyond standard elements, even accurately identifying objects within Datawindows. This capability ensures precise interaction with various components of an application's interface, further enhancing the reliability and effectiveness of our automated tests.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"At the moment, all our deploys depend on results of automation. If the tests are failing, then we know that something is wrong at the early stages of development."

"It has increased the speed of our regression testing."

"The extensive range of products available to simulate is something I have come to appreciate as it has resulted in an ability to broaden the scope of our tests."

"This solution helps lower the overhead cost associated with buying multiple devices."

"When I started to work on testing automation, I was very excited about how easy it is to run tests on different browsers. It was just a matter of configuration."

"Each new session started with the live testing feature allows for a cleared browser and new experience to be able to not only see these attributes on the page clearly but also pass clean data."

"The ability to choose from many devices is the best feature."

"The features that I find most useful and the ones that I use the most are local site testing, device and browser testing, and screenshots."

More CrossBrowserTesting pros

"I have been working with different vendors in my role, I can say without hesitation that the Zeenyx Support Staff are the best group I've worked with."

"As a platform corporation a primary strategic goal is to develop coherent tests across platforms, and this is where Ascential Test shines."

"Customer service is excellent; very helpful in addressing the issues and never hesitant in accepting the issues from their end; very responsive and quick to provide assistance."

"It's been really easy to automate the same applications TestComplete struggled with."

"AscentialTest's object recognition in snapshots is a robust feature that goes beyond standard elements, even accurately identifying objects within Datawindows."

"Great support, powerful tool, easy enough for entry-level staff to use."

"Our web site is dynamically generated to each user, so much so that the only testing solution we found was AscentialTest."

"I am a 30+ year IT professional and the level of support I have gotten has been unparalleled."

More Zeenyx AscentialTest pros

Cons

"Elements of 'real' mobile/tablet testing could be sped up."

"I have had quite a few issues trying to use a virtual machine to test our application on."

"The "Getting Started" documentation for Selenium testing could be improved."

"Sometimes the testing is slow."

"Sometimes, some of their instances fail, particularly in older versions of browsers."

"This solution would benefit from faster testing and support for more devices."

"There should be more detailed training on CrossBrowserTesting."

"A wider range of physical devices with more browser versions in the Selenium Grid would be great to insure users with out-of-date devices are able to interact with our sites."

More CrossBrowserTesting cons

"The only thing I can't wait for is for Zeenyx to add automating Mobile apps."

"I would like to see an improvement in the User Interface."

"It would be great if AscentialTest supported the license server being in the cloud."

"Classes are not as object-oriented as I would like, but I am a programmer and not QA so I expect a lot."

"We did observe that aborting the test run of a test set in the middle of execution was taking a long time."

"It would be better if the support for Web Tables and Siebel Tables are readily available and made more simpler as they are encountered quite often while automating the apps."

"Streamlining the retrieval of results from individual test set runs would be beneficial."

"The product does have limitations on how certain project files are locked (checked-out)."

More Zeenyx AscentialTest cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"CrossBrowserTesting offered the best value for its price."

"It is worth the pricing as the product is supported on multiple platforms and browsers."

"The lowest price point is very reasonable. It is also useful if only one person in the company needs to check on the browser display."

"SmartBear offers bundles of products that work together."

"A few intermediary pricing options for small QA teams would be nice, e.g., unlimited screenshots, "as you need it" parallel tests, etc."

"Once it starts generating ROI, which for us took between three and six months, one will not even think about the investment."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Comms Service Provider

Educational Organization

Performing Arts

Healthcare Company

19%

University

13%

Manufacturing Company

Performing Arts

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	10

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Zeenyx AscentialTest?

AscentialTest's object recognition in snapshots is a robust feature that goes beyond standard elements, even accurately identifying objects within Datawindows.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Zeenyx AscentialTest?

While Zeenyx AscentialTest has proven to be a valuable asset in our testing processes, there are areas where improvements could enhance the overall user experience. One notable aspect is the user i...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Zeenyx AscentialTest?

We use AscentialTest for automated testing of Powerbuilder applications via CI/CD pipeline with GitLab. We have fully integrated all tests in our CI/CD pipeline. Thanks to the integration, much wor...

See all answers

Comparisons

BrowserStack vs CrossBrowserTesting

Compared 19% of the time

Sauce Labs vs CrossBrowserTesting

Compared 12% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs CrossBrowserTesting

Compared 8% of the time

TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest) vs CrossBrowserTesting

Compared 5% of the time

Visual Studio Test Professional vs CrossBrowserTesting

Compared 5% of the time

More CrossBrowserTesting Competitors

OpenText Functional Testing vs Zeenyx AscentialTest

Compared 6% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Zeenyx AscentialTest

Compared 6% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing for Developers vs Zeenyx AscentialTest

Compared 5% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs Zeenyx AscentialTest

Compared 5% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs Zeenyx AscentialTest

Compared 5% of the time

More Zeenyx AscentialTest Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CrossBrowserTesting

March 2026

Download CrossBrowserTesting product report

Buyer's Guide

Zeenyx AscentialTest

February 2026

Download Zeenyx AscentialTest product report

Also Known As

No data available

AscentialTest

Overview

CrossBrowserTesting is a cloud testing platform that gives instant access to 1500+ different real desktop and mobile browsers for testers, developers, and designers.

Native debugging tools make manual testing easy to inspect and correct HTML, CSS, and JavaScript errors on any browser.
Take automated screenshots across multiple browsers at once, then compare side-by-side against historical test runs.

SmartBear

AscentialTest™ by Zeenyx Software is an enterprise level Test Management System that encompasses Test Planning, Development, Data Management, Execution and Defect Tracking for applications running on Windows, the web, java, dotNet, terminals and PowerBuilder. This “next generation” testing solution allows users to build robust automated and manual tests from reusable components created by its powerful object recognition engine without recording or scripting. Our patented ‘snapshot’ technology generates graphical representations of the application under test which allows users to build ‘Steps’ by dragging and dropping objects in a visual test editor. Reusable Steps are combined to form a multitude of automated and manual tests that are easy to create and maintain. With AscentialTest, companies realize a dramatic reduction in test creation and maintenance times, resulting in increased productivity and lower costs.

Zeenyx

Sample Customers

St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Accenture, Sony, Los Angeles Times, ADP, Verizon, T-Mobile, Wistia

TJX Companies, Nuance Communications, Ericsson Inc., Transatlantic Reinsurance Company, Accenture, Nutrition Coordinating Center, Univ. of MN, iConectiv, Fortress Software, and LMP Corp.

Buyer's Guide

CrossBrowserTesting vs. Zeenyx AscentialTest

March 2026

Free Report: CrossBrowserTesting vs. Zeenyx AscentialTest

Find out what your peers are saying about CrossBrowserTesting vs. Zeenyx AscentialTest and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CrossBrowserTesting vs. Zeenyx AscentialTest report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.