Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management vs Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) comparison

Broadcom and Google are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Broadcom is ranked #49 with an average rating of 7.0, while Google is ranked #23 with an average rating of 10.0. Broadcom holds a 0.4% mindshare in APM, compared to Google’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 50% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Google users who would recommend it.

Cross-Enterprise Applicatio...

Read 2 Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management reviews

485 Views
485 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

Google Cloud's operations s...

Read 10 Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) reviews

2,481 Views
1,861 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Cross-Enterprise Applicatio...

Google Cloud's operations s...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) and Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management are both robust platforms tailored for monitoring and optimizing application performance. User reviews suggest that Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management has richer features, though Google Cloud's operations suite is more competitive on pricing and support, making it desirable for cost-sensitive clients.

Features: Users appreciate the comprehensive monitoring and logging capabilities of Google Cloud's operations suite, while Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management is praised for its detailed analytics and extensive integration options. Despite Google Cloud's operations suite's strong performance metrics, Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management's advanced features give it a significant edge.

Room for Improvement: For Google Cloud's operations suite, users mention the need for better customization options and more intuitive alert management. In contrast, Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management requires a more streamlined setup process and enhanced reporting functionalities. While both products exhibit areas needing refinement, Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management's setup complexity is a larger concern for users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Google Cloud's operations suite offers a relatively straightforward deployment process complemented by responsive customer service. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management, however, has a more complex deployment but compensates with excellent customer support. Users find Google Cloud's operations suite easier to deploy, but both platforms deliver solid customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Users find Google Cloud's operations suite to be cost-effective with satisfactory ROI. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management, while more expensive upfront, provides substantial long-term value due to its rich feature set. Despite its higher cost, users believe the ROI from Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management justifies the investment.

To learn more, read our detailed Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management vs. Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management vs. Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,114 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cross-Enterprise Applicatio...

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

49th

Average Rating

6.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Google Cloud's operations s...

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

23rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Log Management (24th), Cloud Monitoring Software (17th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management is 0.4%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) is 0.9%, down from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)	0.9%
Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management	0.4%
Other	98.7%

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Mohammed Shahpoup

Senior Deputy Manager, ITSM Architect at ICT Misr

Offers a great reporting experience, with much customization and flexibility in extracting reports but it can be more user-friendly

My experience indicates that it needs enhancements in the UI. We are in 2024, and the GUI doesn't meet current expectations for user interfaces or Excel integration. Mainly, CA Service Desk has such a bad user interface. All features and systems, like servers, should have a modern graphical user interface, but CA Service Desk remains classic and still uses a desktop-based interface. It doesn't add features easily; if you need additional functionality, you have to go through many steps. Competitors like ServiceNow, Micro Focus SMAX, and ManageEngine all have better user interfaces. This is the main solution that needs improvement. I am very satisfied with the modeling systems, the grid, and the existing features, except for the graphical user interface.

Read full review

Anand_Patel

Senior Technical Architect at T-Systems International GmbH

Offers reliable Ops Agent and logging transport feature with easy third-party integrations

As part of our company, we implemented several changes in our log analytics pattern, including the storage and procurement process. Earlier, before implementing the solution, our company was able to procure only one year of data, but later, we came to the three-year mark. Around 15-20% reduction has been witnessed in the total analytic consumption of our company. The aforementioned result was possible because the solution allowed the creation of a dashboard where factors like storage costs, proportion of logs, and logs presence in a storage bucket or Big Query can all be checked. Earlier all logs were stored in a raw storage, but currently our company is able to move logs in table bucket that contributes towards cost savings. It has default integration for all gcp services. recently managed Prometheus support gives more flexibility to organizations to remain connected with their current Prometheus setup. We leveraged integrated FinOps Hub for recommendations for our workloads and server configurations, helpd us lot in order to get maximum TCO.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"All solutions from Broadcom are very easy to install."

"The technical support and documentation are quite good."

"It's easy to use."

"We find the solution to be stable."

"Offers a valuable logging transport feature"

"Our company has a corporate account for Google Cloud and so our systems and clusters integrate really well."

"Provides visibility into the performance uptime."

"I like the monitoring feature."

"Google's technical support is very good."

"The most valuable feature is the multi-cloud integration, where there is support for both GCP and AWS."

More Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) pros

Cons

"They lack support and presence in Egypt."

"The UI could be better. When I look at the dashboard, for example, the information looks cluttered and unorganized."

"It could be even more automated."

"The product provides minimal metrics that are insufficient."

"The process of logging analytics can be improved"

"It is difficult to estimate in advance how much something is going to cost."

"This solution could be improved if it offered the ability to analyze charts, such as a solution like Kibana."

"Lacking sufficient operations documentation."

"While we are satisfied with the overall performance, in certain cases we must add additional metrics and additional tools like Grafana and Dynatrace."

"The logging functionality could be better."

More Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would rate the pricing a three out of ten, with ten being expensive. So, it is rather cheap."

"We have a basic standard license without any additional costs."

"The cost of using Stackdriver depends on usage."

"The cost could be lower."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

12%

University

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	8

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management?

I would rate the pricing a three out of ten, with ten being expensive. So, it is rather cheap. On a yearly basis, we pay $400,000. It is fixed, but it differs from year to year because we can add m...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management?

At our bank, we have two teams: * one for Network Operations Center (NOC) and * another for administration and innovation. I am the technical lead in administration. For daily basis, the NOC team u...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google Stackdriver?

As Ops Suite, is a google product which effectively comes at zero setup cost, in order to manage your on-premises logs on onsite, it involves negligible cost for using ops agent and it also include...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Google Stackdriver?

If the errors are caught early in the interface, it would be easier for users to manage. The process of logging analytics can be improved.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Google Stackdriver?

I use the solution for logging, defining alerts, and monitoring. Our company's Java and Python logging teams mainly use it.

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

AWS X-Ray vs Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)

Compared 16% of the time

Datadog vs Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)

Compared 9% of the time

Amazon CloudWatch vs Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)

Compared 6% of the time

Sentry vs Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)

Compared 5% of the time

New Relic vs Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)

Compared 5% of the time

More Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

January 2026

Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management report

Download Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

January 2026

Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) report

Download Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) product report

Also Known As

CA Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management

Google Stackdriver, Stackdriver Monitoring, Stackdriver Logging, Google Cloud Monitoring

Overview

CA Cross-Enterprise APM provides 24/7 monitoring of business transactions for complex application environments by monitoring the real-time performance of mainframe subsystems and providing CA Application Performance Management with this data on a single pane of glass.

Broadcom

Real-time log management and analysis

Cloud Logging is a fully managed service that performs at scale and can ingest application and platform log data, as well as custom log data from GKE environments, VMs, and other services inside and outside of Google Cloud. Get advanced performance, troubleshooting, security, and business insights with Log Analytics, integrating the power of BigQuery into Cloud Logging.

Built-in metrics observability at scale

Cloud Monitoring provides visibility into the performance, uptime, and overall health of cloud-powered applications. Collect metrics, events, and metadata from Google Cloud services, hosted uptime probes, application instrumentation, and a variety of common application components. Visualize this data on charts and dashboards and create alerts so you are notified when metrics are outside of expected ranges.

Stand-alone managed service for running and scaling Prometheus

Managed Service for Prometheus is a fully managed Prometheus-compatible monitoring solution, built on top of the same globally scalable data store as Cloud Monitoring. Keep your existing visualization, analysis, and alerting services, as this data can be queried with PromQL or Cloud Monitoring.

Monitor and improve your application's performance

Application Performance Management (APM) combines the monitoring and troubleshooting capabilities of Cloud Logging and Cloud Monitoring with Cloud Trace and Cloud Profiler to help you reduce latency and cost so you can run more efficient applications.

Google

Sample Customers

NIIT Technologies, Cetip Safeguards

Uber, Batterii, Q42, Dovetail Games

Buyer's Guide

Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management vs. Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)

December 2025

Free Report: Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management vs. Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)

Find out what your peers are saying about Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management vs. Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management vs. Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.