Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Cohere vs Writer comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Cohere
Ranking in AI Writing Tools
9th
Ranking in Large Language Models (LLMs)
6th
Ranking in AI Proofreading Tools
8th
Average Rating
7.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
AI Development Platforms (19th)
Writer
Ranking in AI Writing Tools
16th
Ranking in Large Language Models (LLMs)
9th
Ranking in AI Proofreading Tools
13th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the AI Writing Tools category, the mindshare of Cohere is 1.5%. The mindshare of Writer is 0.8%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
AI Writing Tools Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Cohere1.5%
Writer0.8%
Other97.7%
AI Writing Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Gokul Anil - PeerSpot reviewer
Has streamlined test creation and analysis while needing better semantic accuracy for specific domain knowledge
Cohere is very useful because I have been in scenarios where code was written with multiple reusable concepts containing many functionalities covered as different functions, but without descriptions of what particular functions were doing. We used Cohere intelligence and its knowledge on Oracle ERP PPM, and it was able to read through all the TypeScript code and create descriptions intelligently, which were almost 90% correct when reviewed. It was very useful because we had 500-plus reusables, and it was able to analyze all of them and put them into a catalog. This makes it very easy to find and use the catalog to determine whether existing functionality is already implemented, preventing redundant implementations. When it creates a new test, it creates it almost 70 to 80% correctly without errors. The time savings are significant - what previously took one or two days can now be completed in two to three hours maximum. We can complete many more tests in a day or sprint with Cohere's help. Along with test automation, we handle analysis tasks, and now we have more time for better analysis. We are planning to implement test analysis capabilities as well. Once you receive the requirements and test cases, you can directly use them as input, and it will generate all artifacts and test data.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AI Writing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
872,706 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
12%
Computer Software Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Government
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cohere?
I'm not in the position to answer that question because I was not the one who deployed that model, but I believe it is because we see the model name as ARN name, so it's most likely coming from Bed...
What needs improvement with Cohere?
It would be better to have a dashboard for users to showcase how reranking helps improve quality. When end users choose the service, they want to see the actual output. The evaluation part is chall...
What is your primary use case for Cohere?
We founded this company two and a half years ago, and since the middle of 2022, we foresaw the trending of generative AI and large language models, so my startup is working on developing generative...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Google, OpenAI, Grammarly and others in AI Writing Tools. Updated: October 2025.
872,706 professionals have used our research since 2012.