CloudLock vs Netskope comparison

Cisco and Netskope are both solutions in the Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB) category. Cisco is ranked #23, while Netskope is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.6. Cisco holds a 0.9% mindshare in CASB, compared to Netskope’s 13.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Netskope users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

Netskope and CloudLock are competing cloud security solutions, excelling in distinct areas of the industry. Netskope generally has an edge due to its comprehensive security features, while CloudLock is favored for its smooth integration process.

Features: Netskope stands out with advanced threat protection, real-time data and application visibility, and granular policy controls. CloudLock is known for robust cloud access security broker capabilities, seamless collaboration security, and integration versatility with numerous applications.

Room for Improvement: Netskope can improve in simplifying its complex configuration processes, enhancing user interface intuitiveness, and offering more competitive pricing without compromising features. CloudLock could benefit from expanding its threat protection functionalities, improving scalability for larger enterprises, and refining its data loss prevention capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Netskope provides extensive deployment options and dedicated support, easing complex security implementations. Conversely, CloudLock focuses on a streamlined deployment model, ensuring easy integration with current infrastructure and efficient customer support for straightforward inquiries.

Pricing and ROI: Netskope requires a substantial initial investment but delivers high ROI through its comprehensive security setup. CloudLock offers a more attractive price point, ensuring quicker ROI by emphasizing essential security features. While Netskope’s pricing reflects its advanced offerings, CloudLock appeals to those seeking cost-effective and rapid setups.

To learn more, read our detailed CloudLock vs. Netskope Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

CloudLock vs. Netskope

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,800 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

iboss

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB) category, the mindshare of iboss is 4.6%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of CloudLock is 0.9%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Netskope is 13.4%, down from 13.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Netskope	13.4%
iboss	4.6%
CloudLock	0.9%
Other	81.1%

Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB)

Featured Reviews

Ashok Ananthula

Senior Consultant Proxy Engineering at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Cloud gateway has strengthened remote web security and now needs better Mac and ISP support

The problem our organization had is that iboss failed for the Mac devices. It is not able to give a successful agent for the Mac agents. That is where in 2025, we had to migrate to the Palo Alto-based platform. If your use case is for just Windows laptops,you can consider this platform as an option One issue is the data center resiliency part. In India especially, they are not tied up with the Tier 1 ISPs like Tata or Airtel; they were having Tier 2 ISPs and encountered many issues reaching few major sites that my organization depends on, and they were having problems that they could not fix quickly. They also lack a mechanism to route that traffic within their data center; rather, they ask customers to make a pac file change to route it to Singapore explicitly. It would be better if they route from their backend , i mean even if I send it to India DC, they should be able to route it internally to make that work; however, they fail to do that and ask the customer to route it in the pac file. Another suggestion is that in China, they do not have the proper setup; they used to have numerous problems with slowness and lack of premium circuits in China as well. That leads to multiple sites working slowly with latency-related issues. So the main issue is the ISP-related problems that need to be solved.

Read full review

reviewer779877

Senior Software Engineer with 501-1,000 employees

Screens sensitive data but it should be a bigger part of an end-user device

The only improvement is that it has to be a bigger part of an end-user device. It should look at how endpoints appear on the EDR rather than creating an API to integrate into the agent app which need additional development effort. We have to integrate the source code into the system endpoint and make it as part of the connected app.

Read full review

Aravind Vellingiri

Cyber security consultant at L&T Technology Services

User-friendly console integrates robust security features for seamless traffic management

Netskope serves as a single web console carrying out multiple functionalities: Zero Trust Network Architecture (ZTNA), Secure Web Gateway (SWG), Cloud Access Security Broker (CASB), Web DLP, and firewall services. I can toggle between these features on a single platform, enhancing ease of use. In comparison, Zscaler requires multiple consoles for managing similar features. Having these functionalities integrated into one dashboard makes Netskope efficient and user-friendly.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Content filtering is the most useful feature of iboss."

"Consolidating management into iboss's single pane of glass has helped my organization reduce operational costs by around twenty to twenty-five percent."

"iboss is definitely very good in terms of service."

"This product is solid, fairly easy to use, and reliable."

"We were impressed by the solution's mental health function, which can detect if someone needs help. It scans what users are browsing and flags warning signs so we can check to see if they are okay. We've had to use it a couple of times."

"Its initial setup was straightforward."

"iboss is among the few products providing inline filtering where no application is needed on the device. It operates on the network side and is not device-based. This feature was one of the main reasons why we stayed with them for so long."

"First of all, the security policies are essential. I do not have to rely solely on Active Directory for our users."

More iboss pros

"CloudLock is a great solution if you use multiple cloud systems like Google, Salesforce, AWS, and so on, because you can scan all systems with one tool."

"I like CloudLock because when data gets sent out, I do not want it to get out of the environment. In today's world, a lot of users will remotely use the application. It screens all of the sensitive data. That data will really be as part of the environment that you do not want it to be part of. CloudLock is protection for sensitive data."

"It allows us to know where sensitive data is really stored and offers the ability to quarantine based on data types and sharing criteria."

"It is a good CASB solution for protection of collaboration of content."

"I like CloudLock because when data gets sent out, I do not want it to get out of the environment."

"The cloud infrastructure is the solution's most valuable feature."

"The solution is very stable and reliable."

"The most valuable features were related to discovery, data protection, and ensuring compliance with regulations."

"Amazing reporting and tracking mechanisms."

"Netskope is an efficient, reliable, and easy-to-manage solution."

"Netskope started with a cloud-first approach, which makes it adaptable to the day-to-day changes that the cloud will generate."

"In Azure, we have multiple subscriptions and with every subscription, we add some kind of instance ID. We can work with the instance ID so that we allow all of the instances containing nodules. Everything else, we block. This way, if you go to outlook.com and check your email, if you log in with your company account, the instance ID will show. The network will take action according to the instance ID and say, "You are using the enterprise email. I'll let you surf. I'll let you see your email." But when you try to log in with your own email address, like Hotmail or Gmail, the instance ID will be different. This way we are not completely blocking Outlook, but we are blocking people from accessing their Outlook. We are only allowing the enterprise-level emails, and we are not allowing user-based emails."

"The tool provides extensive DLP features."

"The most valuable feature for us is the 360-degree visibility it provides."

"The most valuable feature of Netskope is protection."

More Netskope pros

Cons

"The endpoint-type solution is an area that needs some improvement."

"I have heard they are doing DDoS filtering, but I am not certain if they are implementing it correctly."

"The solution could be stronger on the integration side and offer more cloud applications like G Suite or Oracle."

"The problem our organization had is that iboss failed for the Mac devices; it is not able to give a successful agent for the Mac agents, and that is where in 2025 we had to migrate to the Palo Alto-based platform."

"To scale up, a new iboss Node Blade Chassis must be purchased."

"Regarding pricing, setup costs, and licensing, iboss is not cheap, and that's my only concern."

"The reporting feature needs improvement. It doesn't give you the expected results. It is quite difficult to get the specific reports needed, and it is not as intuitive as the rest of the platform."

"iboss can be improved because the integration could be better; you need to import all the sites that you access today, and there are a few problems whenever you import thousands of websites, making the integration process messy for the users."

More iboss cons

"As long as this issue exists, CloudLock or any other product is only a band-aid solution."

"Like all CASB products, this product also needs to expand its capabilities and features in order to increase scope of application."

"The solution needs to have better integration capabilities. I have a lot of customers asking about how they can integrate it better."

"The only improvement is that it has to be a bigger part of an end-user device. It should look at how endpoints appear on the EDR rather than creating a separate agent. We have to integrate the source code into the system endpoint and make it an agent."

"The only improvement is that it has to be a bigger part of an end-user device."

"The configuration in the cloud model could be improved upon."

"The solution is not very scalable."

"Netskope CASB can improve by working more similarly to a VPN technology instead of a proxy. They then could have visibility on the endpoint device. Most clients have some tools where they check the endpoint health or other things, such as the security posture, or if they want to access the resources. For example, if they should have antivirus running, this kind of posture check should be available but it is missing."

"I personally dealt with their support team, and the support was bad."

"Support services could definitely be improved."

"Accuracy could be improved."

"They lack a cloud security posture management solution."

"The solution's implementations can be made much easier because, currently, it is complex in nature."

More Netskope cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We had the cost of purchasing a new appliance along with the implementation and licensing costs. However, the following year, the cost of just licensing was similar to what was paid the previous year for a new appliance along with the implementation and licensing costs."

"We have not priced the solution recently, but they were competitive with other vendors in the past."

"The overall pricing for iboss is very competitive and transparent."

"It is expensive compared to one of its competitors."

"It is probably in line with other solutions, but I do not deal with the financial side."

"It is not expensive, and it is also not cheap. iboss is priced right in the sweet spot for the number of features it offers."

Information not available

"The price of the solution is fair but it depends on your use case."

"It is an expensive solution."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is expensive, and ten is cheap, I rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten."

"Licensing fees are paid annually."

"I rate the product's price a six on a scale of one to ten, where one is expensive, and ten is low price."

"I recall that the price was considerably cheaper than that of Zscaler. It was around 60,000 AUD for 1,000 users per year and included some training and some premier support offerings. If we wanted to take advantage of the CASB capabilities, then there was an additional subscription fee, for which we didn't have the budget. On price, I would give Netskope a three or four out of five because it's quite expensive, but it offers a lot of value."

"The pricing is very flexible."

"I would rate the pricing nine out of ten."

More Netskope pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Construction Company

No data available

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Computer Software Company

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	10

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	15
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	25

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with iboss?

I think iboss could be improved by making reporting and dashboard customization more flexible, and simplifying troubl...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for iboss?

I use iboss as a cloud-based secure web gateway to provide secure internet access, web filtering, and protect remote ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for iboss?

My experience with iboss's pricing structure, setup cost, and licensing model has been positive, straightforward, and...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Which is better, Zscaler internet access or Netsckope CASB?

We researched Netskope but ultimately chose Zscaler. Netskope is a cloud access security broker that helps identify ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Netskope CASB?

The pricing is reasonable compared to other products.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Netskope CASB?

Netskope's pricing is very high compared to other vendors, and compared to Zscaler, Netskope has less capability.

See all answers

Comparisons

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs iboss

Compared 10% of the time

Fortinet FortiGate vs iboss

Compared 8% of the time

FortiSASE vs iboss

Compared 6% of the time

Cisco Umbrella vs iboss

Compared 6% of the time

Zscaler Internet Access vs iboss

Compared 5% of the time

More iboss Competitors

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs CloudLock

Compared 28% of the time

Skyhigh Security vs CloudLock

Compared 21% of the time

Cisco Umbrella vs CloudLock

Compared 20% of the time

Oracle CASB Cloud Service vs CloudLock

Compared 12% of the time

More CloudLock Competitors

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs Netskope

Compared 19% of the time

Zscaler Internet Access vs Netskope

Compared 6% of the time

Cato SASE Cloud Platform vs Netskope

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps vs Netskope

Compared 5% of the time

Cisco Secure Access vs Netskope

Compared 5% of the time

More Netskope Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

iboss

July 2026

Download iboss product report

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB)

July 2026

Download CloudLock product report

Buyer's Guide

Netskope

July 2026

Download Netskope product report

Also Known As

iBoss Cloud Platform

No data available

Netskope CASB

Overview

Iboss offers a comprehensive cloud-based security platform valued for its scalability and autonomous features, ensuring robust security with easy deployment and management capabilities.

Renowned for its robust security architecture, Iboss integrates seamlessly within diverse networks, delivering efficient granular filtering and advanced content categorization. Its single pane of glass console provides ease of management, allowing rapid scalability suitable for rapidly deploying environments. Operates in BYOD setups due to inline filtering without device installation. Integration with cloud-based applications enhances user control, and features like SASE, SSL inspection, and ChatGPT risk protection stand as highlights. Despite its strengths, users have pointed out areas for enhancement like direct navigation in reports, SSL decryption, and better cloud integration while having room to improve data loss prevention.

What are the most important features of Iboss?

Scalability: Supports rapid deployment across diverse networks.
SASE: A consolidated approach to secure access.
SSL Inspection: Ensures safe data transmission.
Granular Filtering: Detailed control over accessible content.
Single Pane Management: Unifies control through a centralized console.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Cost-effectiveness: Offers competitive pricing with robust features.
Autonomous Operation: Reduces management overhead.
Responsive Support: Provides assistance when needed.
Flexible Deployment: Available for both cloud and on-premises environments.

The usage of Iboss spans educational institutions, specifically K-12, to enforce internet policies, protect data, and support remote work environments. It provides web filtering and security frameworks to ensure safe browsing. Its platform-as-a-service model offers flexibility for both cloud-based and on-premises requirements, integrating seamlessly to deliver enhanced security features suitable for various deployment needs including zero trust, CASB, and network security for work-from-home setups.

iboss

CloudLock provides advanced security solutions for cloud-based environments by allowing organizations to monitor, control, and secure data without affecting user functionality.

CloudLock offers an integrated approach to data protection, helping businesses manage compliance and security challenges across their cloud platforms. It enables real-time policy enforcement and anomaly detection across cloud applications, ensuring sensitive data is adequately safeguarded while facilitating seamless collaboration.

What are CloudLock's essential features?

Policy Management: Implements policies to control data access and sharing in cloud environments.
Threat Detection: Identifies suspicious activities using behavioral analytics to enhance security measures.
Compliance Monitoring: Assists organizations in adhering to industry regulations through continuous compliance tracking.
App Discovery: Detects and manages third-party applications connected to organization networks.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Cost Efficiency: Reduces costs by preventing data breaches and compliance penalties.
Operational Efficiency: Streamlines security processes, allowing teams to focus on core objectives.
Risk Reduction: Minimizes risks through comprehensive monitoring and threat intelligence.
Enhanced Security Posture: Strengthens defenses with advanced threat detection capabilities.

In various industries like healthcare and finance, CloudLock is adopted to ensure that data meets regulatory compliance standards. By integrating seamlessly across cloud platforms, businesses in these fields can protect sensitive information, supporting stringent privacy requirements while promoting operational efficiency.

Cisco

Netskope provides cutting-edge cloud security, offering comprehensive data protection with scalable architecture and 360-degree visibility.

Netskope offers organizations a streamlined cloud-native security approach that simplifies enforcing policies and ensures secure data handling. It provides real-time threat protection, tenant differentiation, and robust policy management. Integrating with tools like Office 365 enhances data governance and visibility across applications such as Teams and Google Workspace.

What are the key features of Netskope?

Cloud Access Security Broker (CASB): Ensures secure access and data protection for cloud services.
Data Loss Prevention (DLP): Protects against accidental or malicious data leaks.
Real-Time Protection: Provides immediate threat detection and response capabilities.
SaaS Application Control: Offers granular controls over software-as-a-service applications.
Integration Capabilities: Works seamlessly with existing tools for improved security posture.

What benefits or ROI can users expect?

Load Reduction: Minimizes performance impact on cloud resources.
Enhanced Threat Detection: Advanced capabilities to identify potential security threats.
Cloud Governance: Facilitates effective management and control of cloud resources.
Ease of Use: Simplifies deployment and management processes.

Industries adopting Netskope typically focus on cloud security to safeguard sensitive data across multi-cloud environments. Organizations utilize its capabilities for remote access security, web filtering, and identity management to address compliance and regulatory requirements. By ensuring secure, efficient data handling, Netskope proves valuable across sectors with diverse security needs.

Netskope

Sample Customers

More than 4,000 global enterprises trust the iboss Cloud Platform to support their modern workforces, including a large number of Fortune 50 companies.

Dominion Enterprises, Quality Distribution, Clark Construction Group LLC, Ahold, Middlesex Hospital, Austin Community College (ACC), Dominion Enterprises, The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, Oakland Unified School District, Sunnova, Damballa, Financial Times, Boise State University

NetApp, Genomic Health, Caterpillar, Apollo, Pandora, Continental Resources, Fractal, infinera, Tesla

Buyer's Guide

CloudLock vs. Netskope

June 2026

Free Report: CloudLock vs. Netskope

Find out what your peers are saying about CloudLock vs. Netskope and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CloudLock vs. Netskope report.

See our list of best Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB) vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.