I wasn't involved in the initial discussions about its cost. However, within the next year, by around June, I'll need to review the vendors' quotes. Typically, our procurement team handles the process by issuing an RFP to vendors to get quotes. From there, we evaluate based on pricing and may conduct a proof of concept to assess value.
Security Solution Architect at a consultancy with 11-50 employees
Real User
Dec 20, 2023
Netskope is not as expensive as Palo Alto. On a scale from one to ten, where one is expensive, and ten is cheap, I rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten.
Information Technology Sourcing Lead - Global Procurement Shared Services at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Dec 8, 2023
I cannot disclose the licensing costs attached to the solution. Netskope is a reasonably priced product, but it is not so expensive because there are other products in the market that are more expensive. I rate the product's price a six on a scale of one to ten, where one is expensive, and ten is low price.
Pricing depends on customer relationships, negotiations, and partner involvement. Each product owner has their own licensing terms, which all play into the overall cost because they involve a partner. Overall, it depends on the negotiation skills. Netskope's pricing is reasonable compared to Microsoft. Microsoft tends to sell individual licenses as bundles. For instance, if you're using licenses like E3 versus E5, E3 offers limited functionality, while E5 provides a bundle. Microsoft's pricing is somewhat higher, considering Netskope's capabilities as well.
Sales Manager at a non-profit with 11-50 employees
Reseller
Mar 9, 2023
There could be room for improvement in the subscription process. The current process is via an application, which requires a scan of the apps being used to determine the necessary licensing. This process could be simplified by basing the licensing on the number of users, similar to Netskope's work gateway solution. This would make it easier for the end user to request a quote without having to go through the discovery process.
Manager at a media company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Jan 16, 2023
The solution is affordable, and a licensing fee is charged yearly. Access to customer service and support is included in the licensing charges. I rate the licensing fees an eight out of ten.
Licensing fees are paid annually. Fees are comparable to others. Pricing is somewhere in the middle. There are no additional licensing costs, however, there are operational costs. The customer will have to hire an additional person to train him on how to use the product.
Licensing wasn't cheap, particularly when you take into account the number of hours our team had to put in to get issues resolved, and even then they weren't able to get where the company needed to be.
Head Of Information Security at Aarti Industries Limited
Real User
Aug 3, 2021
There is a license required for this solution and there are many licensing models available. For example, what applications are covered as part of the license.
Storage and Backup Team Leader at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Dec 5, 2020
I'm more of a technician. I don't handle billing or payments. Therefore, it's difficult for me to assume the cost of the product or what the client is paying. I'm not sure if it is monthly or yearly and I couldn't say if it is high or low.
Netscope is a Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) platform that includes core products such as Cloud Access Security Broker (CASB) and Security Service Edge (SSE).
Netskope CASB is a cloud access security broker tool that allows you to adopt cloud applications and services without sacrificing security. The solution makes it possible to manage the movement of sensitive data between cloud app instances and in the context of app risk and user risk. With Netskope’s industry-leading cloud security...
The pricing is reasonable compared to other products.
Netskope is cost-effective compared to similar solutions like Zscaler.
The cost is comparable to other vendors, and it depends on the customer's needs.
Before, it was a lot cheaper. Now they're at a higher price.
The pricing is very flexible. I rate the pricing a three out of ten.
I wasn't involved in the initial discussions about its cost. However, within the next year, by around June, I'll need to review the vendors' quotes. Typically, our procurement team handles the process by issuing an RFP to vendors to get quotes. From there, we evaluate based on pricing and may conduct a proof of concept to assess value.
It is an expensive solution.
Netskope is not as expensive as Palo Alto. On a scale from one to ten, where one is expensive, and ten is cheap, I rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten.
I cannot disclose the licensing costs attached to the solution. Netskope is a reasonably priced product, but it is not so expensive because there are other products in the market that are more expensive. I rate the product's price a six on a scale of one to ten, where one is expensive, and ten is low price.
The licensing cost is good for the features. It's about $35 per user per year.
The tool's pricing is not too cheap or expensive. However, it can be costly for a small business.
Pricing depends on customer relationships, negotiations, and partner involvement. Each product owner has their own licensing terms, which all play into the overall cost because they involve a partner. Overall, it depends on the negotiation skills. Netskope's pricing is reasonable compared to Microsoft. Microsoft tends to sell individual licenses as bundles. For instance, if you're using licenses like E3 versus E5, E3 offers limited functionality, while E5 provides a bundle. Microsoft's pricing is somewhat higher, considering Netskope's capabilities as well.
The product's price is average. We are receiving a competitive offer from Trend Micro Apex One. So, we are evaluating it.
The price is in the middle range compared to other solutions. I rate the price of Netskope a five out of five.
There could be room for improvement in the subscription process. The current process is via an application, which requires a scan of the apps being used to determine the necessary licensing. This process could be simplified by basing the licensing on the number of users, similar to Netskope's work gateway solution. This would make it easier for the end user to request a quote without having to go through the discovery process.
The solution is affordable, and a licensing fee is charged yearly. Access to customer service and support is included in the licensing charges. I rate the licensing fees an eight out of ten.
Licensing fees are paid annually. Fees are comparable to others. Pricing is somewhere in the middle. There are no additional licensing costs, however, there are operational costs. The customer will have to hire an additional person to train him on how to use the product.
Licensing wasn't cheap, particularly when you take into account the number of hours our team had to put in to get issues resolved, and even then they weren't able to get where the company needed to be.
There is a license required for this solution and there are many licensing models available. For example, what applications are covered as part of the license.
The solution is designed as a SaaS. The pricing could always be better, and they need to strengthen their relationship with their partners.
The price of the solution is fair but it depends on your use case.
Licensing is on a yearly basis.
The pricing is competitive.
They should work on licensing costs.
I'm more of a technician. I don't handle billing or payments. Therefore, it's difficult for me to assume the cost of the product or what the client is paying. I'm not sure if it is monthly or yearly and I couldn't say if it is high or low.
Licensing is very good. Pricing is a little expensive but it is affordable.