Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Cloudian HyperStore vs NetApp ONTAP comparison

Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.6
Pure Storage FlashBlade reduces total cost of ownership by enhancing efficiency, enabling fast restorations, and supporting diverse use cases.
Sentiment score
5.9
Cloudian HyperStore offers high ROI, reducing costs and storage management overhead compared to AWS, with quick CAPEX payback.
Sentiment score
7.6
NetApp ONTAP enhances cost efficiency by optimizing storage through compression and deduplication, improving performance and reducing hardware expenses.
It does not require much management once you set up correctly, so it saves time, allowing an admin to focus on other work.
In comparison to AWS, within fourteen months, the CAPEX investment pays off due to Cloudian's pricing model.
I have seen a pretty good ROI with Cloudian HyperStore in terms of reduced storage management overhead, lower cost per terabyte, and improved productivity across teams.
In the long run, we can see a 10% to 20% return on investment.
This needs to be evaluated by the business, especially considering that NetApp phases out technology after some years and introduces newer technology.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.6
Pure Storage FlashBlade's support is generally praised for responsiveness, despite occasional delays and communication issues, maintaining a favorable reputation.
Sentiment score
5.9
Cloudian HyperStore's customer service is praised for responsiveness and expertise, though finding specific experts for complex issues is challenging.
Sentiment score
5.9
NetApp ONTAP support is knowledgeable and quick, but initial responses vary, necessitating escalation for effective resolutions.
I would rate them an eight out of ten.
The support is done through email and is not that great, making it a very problematic area I've been dealing with for over four years.
Their technical support has been perfect lately, so I would give it a 10.
The support plus option provides a high level of assistance, including direct second-line support.
I would rate the customer support for Cloudian HyperStore a 10 out of 10 because they're great.
The quality of the technical support was good.
This includes disk replacement, firmware upgrades, and NetApp ONTAP upgrades, which we handle locally in Nigeria.
The support is top-notch.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.6
Pure Storage FlashBlade excels in scalability, with seamless expansion, downtime-free growth, and praised support across various sectors.
Sentiment score
8.5
Cloudian HyperStore is highly rated for its scalability, smooth capacity expansion, and efficiency in meeting growing storage demands.
Sentiment score
7.6
NetApp ONTAP offers flexible scalability, supporting seamless expansion and integration, enhancing capacity for organizations worldwide, despite minor high-scale limitations.
Pure Storage FlashBlade is scalable.
There are between 5 and 10,000 people using it in our organization.
Cloudian HyperStore's scalability has been awesome; it keeps up with our growing storage needs.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.1
Pure Storage FlashBlade offers exceptional reliability and impressive stability, featuring 99.999% uptime, seamless upgrades, and high performance.
Sentiment score
8.8
Cloudian HyperStore is generally stable and reliable, though some users report occasional minor instability needing support intervention.
Sentiment score
8.1
NetApp ONTAP is praised for high stability, effective bug mitigation, strong support, and reliable performance, enhancing user confidence.
In case there is any issue with any blade, the data is moved to another.
Both stability and scalability are a 10 out of 10.
Sometimes there are system panics, but we have overcome that issue in the latest NetApp ONTAP version.
 

Room For Improvement

Users recommend better pricing, cloud integration, support, documentation, and analytics for Pure Storage FlashBlade, improving efficiency and compatibility.
Cloudian HyperStore needs cost, usability, integration improvements, AI-driven features, and open-source options despite praised performance and reliability.
NetApp ONTAP needs better cloud integration, security, APIs, deduplication, interfaces, performance, power support, and cost efficiency improvements.
Technical support definitely needs significant improvement.
Its configuration should be easier.
One way Pure Storage FlashBlade can be improved is by having more compatibility between the FlashArray and FlashBlade.
Cloudian HyperStore is already very sophisticated, and no changes are needed as it is ahead of market need.
It has consistently met our expectations in terms of performance, scalability, and reliability.
It is important to thoroughly understand customer use cases to tailor the appropriate solution, whether using appliances for performance or software for backup targets.
The support response needs improvement, especially for P1 cases. When critical cases are raised, they should ensure they call the customer and follow up properly.
The interface is very intuitive, and the solution is robust.
 

Setup Cost

Pure Storage FlashBlade is costly but valued for performance, reliability, and reduced administrative overhead, justifying its premium price.
Cloudian HyperStore offers cost-effective, flexible pricing and comprehensive features, making it a competitive choice for enterprises.
NetApp ONTAP's high price offers significant value with feature-rich capabilities and cost-efficiency, benefiting larger organizations despite complex licensing.
The pricing of Pure Storage FlashBlade is expensive compared to other products I used from other companies in the past, but one benefit is that they have built-in ransomware protection.
Regarding pricing, it is okay; we needed exactly this in size, and the price was a lot lower than competitors, making it good for us.
Cloudian HyperStore offers reasonable pricing.
The pricing was competitive.
It is cost-effective for the benefits you get.
 

Valuable Features

Pure Storage FlashBlade excels with ease of use, fast performance, scalability, seamless integration, and efficient storage features.
Cloudian HyperStore excels in scalability, security, and integration, offering flexible, cost-effective data management with extensive compatibility.
NetApp ONTAP offers high availability, data replication, deduplication, ease of use, and integrates well for efficient data management.
We can plug in many blades, and we can have data up to one terabyte.
The best features of Pure Storage FlashBlade include better throughput and better performance.
Pure Storage FlashBlade's scalability is one of the most valuable features, and importantly, it always works, allowing for seamless upgrades.
Cloudian HyperStore positively impacts my organization by helping us centralize our data storage across our teams and simplify our infrastructure, meeting our growing demands on storage while maintaining performance and control.
One of the most significant features of Cloudian is its comprehensive RESTful API stack.
The most valuable aspects of Cloudian HyperStore include its ability to manage data individually, unlike traditional storage solutions.
It lets you know if you have issues early enough so that you can plan around resolving and mitigating future issues.
NetApp ONTAP has improved our organization through speed, efficiency, and data availability, which ensures business continuity.
 

Categories and Ranking

Pure Storage FlashBlade
Sponsored
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
39
Ranking in other categories
All-Flash Storage (16th), Software Defined Storage (SDS) (8th), File and Object Storage (8th)
Cloudian HyperStore
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
File and Object Storage (11th)
NetApp ONTAP
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
92
Ranking in other categories
Storage Software (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

File and Object Storage Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Cloudian HyperStore2.9%
MinIO17.4%
Red Hat Ceph Storage16.7%
Other63.0%
File and Object Storage
Storage Software Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
NetApp ONTAP35.1%
DataCore SANsymphony26.1%
Dell PowerPath15.5%
Other23.299999999999997%
Storage Software
 

Featured Reviews

MikaelHellström - PeerSpot reviewer
Has handled backup storage needs reliably and supports seamless upgrades
In environments requiring high throughput and low latency, Pure Storage FlashBlade provides high throughput and normal latency, but we do not have any application that requires low latency right now, so the latency of three to five milliseconds is considered kind of high. Pure Storage FlashBlade's ability to integrate with enterprise applications is not important for us, as we only want to present an S3 bucket for our backup, which we have done, and it works very fast. We use the Purity software's data reduction techniques; we have a backup software that compresses everything before sending it to the S3 bucket, achieving a data reduction of 1.1 to one. I would recommend Pure Storage FlashBlade to other companies because it's a very fast and scalable solution for anyone who needs it. On a scale of 1-10, I rate this solution an 8.
Kiran Rajanna - PeerSpot reviewer
A seamless solution offering data encryption, quality service, and security encryption
Cloudian HyperStore needs to incorporate AI and predictive analysis. It would be helpful if the solution could analyze and predict how to manage data better. The end users should not have access to protected documents. They should be able to drop the documents. The capacity management dashboard can be better. We also want two-factor authentication using Google Authenticator or Microsoft Authenticator as MFA. Hence, the user would access the console not just by logging in with a password and username but with third-party applications as well.
Naveen Radhwani - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides good performance, stability, and complete data security
Our upcoming investments would be prioritized around a hybrid cloud solution because we ourselves promote the cloud in the market. We are the premium service provider for AWS, so we have that inclination toward cloud computing. From the experience that we had during the pandemic, we are looking for some kind of hybrid solution for our environment. NetApp should focus on a hybrid cloud solution because none of the media houses are opting for cloud storage. The files are quite heavy, and it becomes quite difficult to maintain them on the cloud. If NetApp can provide such technology and fill the gap of storing media files in the cloud, it would give them an advantage.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which File and Object Storage solutions are best for your needs.
873,085 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
7%
Computer Software Company
18%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Retailer
8%
Manufacturing Company
22%
Computer Software Company
13%
University
6%
Performing Arts
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business11
Midsize Enterprise11
Large Enterprise21
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise4
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business11
Midsize Enterprise13
Large Enterprise66
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Pure Storage FlashBlade?
The tool's most valuable feature is its fast performance, especially in handling snapshots. It helps during power out...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Pure Storage FlashBlade?
The pricing of Pure Storage FlashBlade is expensive compared to other products I used from other companies in the pas...
What needs improvement with Pure Storage FlashBlade?
I believe there is not much improvement needed because they have everything we need, but the interface is a little bi...
What needs improvement with Cloudian HyperStore?
At this time, I don't see any major areas where Cloudian HyperStore needs improvement. It has consistently met our ex...
What is your primary use case for Cloudian HyperStore?
Our primary use case for Cloudian HyperStore is managing and scaling unstructured data across our organization. We us...
What advice do you have for others considering Cloudian HyperStore?
My advice for others looking into using Cloudian HyperStore is that if you need really good scalability and API compa...
How does Azure NetApp Files compare to NetApp ONTAP?
Azure NetApp Files is a Microsoft Azure file storage service built on NetApp technology. The platform combines the fi...
What do you like most about NetApp ONTAP?
We do not face any glitches or downtime.
 

Also Known As

No data available
HyperStore, Cloudian HyperStore Object Storage, HyperStore Object Storage
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

ServiceNow, Mercedes-AMG Petronas Motorsport, Dominos, Man AHL
NTT Communications, Casale, Kumo
1&1 IONOS, Acıbadem Healthcare Group, Adder Technologies, Aero Vodochody Aerospace
Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Dell Technologies, Nutanix and others in File and Object Storage. Updated: October 2025.
873,085 professionals have used our research since 2012.