No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler vs Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
8.8
Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler reduces costs, improves productivity, and enhances security with better detection, connectivity, and response times.
Sentiment score
5.3
Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway provides significant ROI, enhancing security while reducing hardware and staffing needs for organizations.
Incident troubleshooting time reduced by 35 to 45 percent because Zscaler logs could be directly used instead of correlating multiple cloud and firewall logs.
Team Lead, Technical Content Security at Valuepoint Systems
We did not need additional staff for cloud traffic security, and audit prep became faster, which helped optimize overall cost.
Cloud Engineer at HCLtech
Now, with Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler, we do it in about thirty seconds, which shows significant time saved.
Decision Scientist at a outsourcing company with 1,001-5,000 employees
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
9.1
Customers praise Cloud Security Connector's effective support, highlighting quick responses, helpful guidance, and prioritized assistance for configuration and deployment.
Sentiment score
6.2
Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway's support varies in responsiveness and expertise, with premium options offering quicker service but higher costs.
In more complex scenarios such as routing or policy tuning, support provided best practices and recommendations, which made the implementation smoother.
Team Lead, Technical Content Security at Valuepoint Systems
They were responsive whenever we had deployment or policy questions, and they helped ensure best practices.
Cloud Engineer at HCLtech
We reached out to customer support three weeks back due to an issue where Zscaler got stuck, and they identified and solved the problem within 45 minutes, which is exceptional.
Head Of The Operations at Flash.co
There are instances where both the response time and technical support quality need improvement.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.7
Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler enables effortless scaling and efficient growth management, supporting large user bases and seamless environment expansion.
Sentiment score
7.1
Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway is scalable and flexible but may require adjustments for optimal performance in larger implementations.
As workloads grow, routing can be updated and traffic can be distributed across multiple connectors without major architecture changes.
Team Lead, Technical Content Security at Valuepoint Systems
The centralized policy scales with it, so we did not hit bottlenecks as we expanded.
Cloud Engineer at HCLtech
Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler's scalability is definitely impressive, as it has handled growth and changes in our organization well.
Head Of The Operations at Flash.co
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.0
Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler offers strong stability and compliance flexibility, though initial setup and connectivity issues may arise.
Sentiment score
7.1
Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway is stable with high ratings, minor latency, and occasional outages affecting stability perceptions.
There have not been any major downtime or critical issues.
Team Lead, Technical Content Security at Valuepoint Systems
We have run it in production for years and it is consistently reliable with no major downtime issues.
Cloud Engineer at HCLtech
Compared to Trellix, we have not faced much downtime with Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler, so it is generally okay.
Decision Scientist at a outsourcing company with 1,001-5,000 employees
 

Room For Improvement

Cloud Security Connector improvements focus on simplified configuration, better integration, enhanced visibility, and streamlined onboarding with automated deployment options.
Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway requires improvements in authentication, malware filtering, feature integration, support, and new technology adoption.
A key learning from this was that while Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler provides strong security control, proper policy tuning and understanding application behavior is critical for smooth deployment.
Team Lead, Technical Content Security at Valuepoint Systems
If I need to suggest an improvement, it would be to simplify the steep learning curve, as it can be complex for newcomers without prior experience.
Head Of The Operations at Flash.co
Having deeper automation through auto-scaling based on workload changes could further reduce manual setup.
Cloud Engineer at HCLtech
They need to enhance their CASB solutions since currently, the cloud index support is low compared to competitors.
The setup process is complex.
PS & Technical Manager at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
 

Setup Cost

Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler offers good value and competitive AWS pricing despite perceived maintenance and scalability costs.
Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway is competitively priced, yet some find it less affordable than alternatives due to feature costs.
Overall, while pricing depends on the enterprise agreement, the solution delivers good value considering the visibility, control, and security it provides.
Team Lead, Technical Content Security at Valuepoint Systems
The experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler is definitely competitive.
Head Of The Operations at Flash.co
Setup costs were mostly tied to initial deployment and policy design, but licensing was predictable based on the number of connectors and throughput.
Cloud Engineer at HCLtech
It's really expensive.
Systems Engineer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
 

Valuable Features

Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler streamlines security with automated detection, zero-trust policies, centralized logging, and unified policy management.
Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway provides robust security with easy setup, customization, and centralized management for secure web access and monitoring.
It also provides Layer 4 routed bypass for TCP, UDP, and ICMP traffic, enabling granular traffic control that streamlines our services working with Zscaler.
Head Of The Operations at Flash.co
The most valuable features of Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler include centralized visibility and control.
Team Lead, Technical Content Security at Valuepoint Systems
One of the best features Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler offers is its agentless design for cloud workloads.
Cloud Engineer at HCLtech
As organizations move away from legacy applications and data centers, the SASE architecture and ZTNA-based operations become essential.
If you have the complete Forcepoint solution, it can integrate with other Forcepoint products, such as DLP solution and email gateway.
PS & Technical Manager at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
 

Categories and Ranking

Cloud Security Connector fo...
Ranking in Internet Security
9th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
8.4
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway
Ranking in Internet Security
4th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
56
Ranking in other categories
Secure Web Gateways (SWG) (8th), Web Content Filtering (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Internet Security category, the mindshare of Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler is 0.7%. The mindshare of Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway is 7.0%, down from 7.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Internet Security Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway7.0%
Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler0.7%
Other92.3%
Internet Security
 

Featured Reviews

Vibin Thomas - PeerSpot reviewer
Team Lead, Technical Content Security at Valuepoint Systems
Unified cloud policies have improved zero-trust controls and simplified workload monitoring
A challenge faced during the initial implementation involved routing and application dependency. After routing cloud workload traffic through Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler, a few applications started failing because they depended on specific external services that were getting blocked due to strict policies or SSL inspection. To resolve this, traffic was analyzed using Zscaler logs, the exact domains and services being impacted were identified, and a controlled policy exception was created while maintaining overall security. This helped strike the right balance between security and application availability, which is very important in production environments. A key learning from this was that while Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler provides strong security control, proper policy tuning and understanding application behavior is critical for smooth deployment. Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler has had a very positive impact, especially in terms of security and operational efficiency. Before implementation, cloud workloads had direct internet access through the NAT gateway, which limited visibility and control over outbound traffic. After adopting Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler, all traffic was routed through Zscaler, giving centralized visibility and full policy enforcement. One improvement observed was a significant increase in threat detection. The ability to identify and block suspicious outbound connections that were previously not visible improved the overall security posture. From an operational perspective, troubleshooting became much faster. Instead of checking multiple cloud logs, Zscaler logs could be directly used to analyze traffic behavior, which reduced incident resolution time. The dependency on traditional firewall appliances in cloud environments was reduced, which simplified the architecture and lowered operational overhead. Additionally, for compliance-driven clients in banking, it helped meet audit requirements by providing detailed logs and consistent policy enforcement across both users and workloads. Measurable improvements were observed after implementing Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler. In terms of visibility and threat detection, a 25 to 35 percent increase in identifying suspicious outbound connections was seen that were previously not visible when traffic was going through NAT. From an operational standpoint, troubleshooting time reduced by 45 to 55 percent because Zscaler logs could be directly analyzed instead of checking multiple cloud logs. Dependence on additional security appliances in the cloud was also reduced, which helped lower operational overhead and simplified the architecture. In terms of compliance, better audit readiness was achieved with centralized logging and consistent policy enforcement across workloads and users. While Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler is a strong solution, one area that could be improved, especially for teams that are new, is configuring route tables, ensuring proper traffic flow, and avoiding asymmetric routing, which can be challenging, particularly in large or multi-VPC environments. More automated deployment options or guided configurations, especially for AWS or Azure, would simplify the onboarding process. Another area for improvement is better visibility at the cloud-native level, such as tighter integration with cloud logs or more context-aware insight for workload behavior, which would make troubleshooting even faster. Once properly implemented, it works efficiently and provides strong security and visibility. In addition to deployment simplicity, improvements around policy tuning and documentation would add significant value. From a policy perspective, when Zscaler policy is extended to cloud workloads, it sometimes requires careful fine-tuning to avoid impacting application dependency. More predefined templates or workload-specific policy recommendations would help teams implement it faster with fewer disruptions. In terms of documentation, while the existing guides are helpful, more step-by-step real-world deployment examples, especially for multi-VPC or hybrid environments, would make onboarding smoother for teams. Tighter integration guidance with cloud-native tools such as AWS logging or monitoring services would further improve troubleshooting and visibility. From a support standpoint, faster access to best practice recommendations or reference architecture would help teams avoid common misconfigurations during the initial setup.
reviewer1047669 - PeerSpot reviewer
PS & Technical Manager at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Has faced usability challenges while managing integrated components
We are working with web gateway and full endpoint security. URL filter is a notable feature. While it is not specifically related to Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway alone, if you have the complete Forcepoint solution, it can integrate with other Forcepoint products, such as DLP solution and email gateway. The URL filter of Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway is good for web gateway. Clients and consumers do not prefer it because the interface is not good. When using FSM with DLP, web gateway, and email gateway, upgrades cannot be performed simultaneously since Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway might need an upgrade while email gateway does not, despite having the same manager controlling them. Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway works well with banking and small companies. Email gateway is less needed as everything is moving to the cloud.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Internet Security solutions are best for your needs.
894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
23%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Insurance Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Comms Service Provider
10%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Healthcare Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business23
Midsize Enterprise6
Large Enterprise29
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler?
In terms of additional improvements, one small enhancement would be having more predefined policy templates for common cloud workload use cases, which would make initial policy tuning faster and re...
What needs improvement with Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler?
A challenge faced during the initial implementation involved routing and application dependency. After routing cloud workload traffic through Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler, a few application...
What is your primary use case for Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler?
Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler securely routes traffic from cloud workloads, such as applications running in AWS or Azure, through the Zscaler cloud for inspection and policy enforcement. In ...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway?
I would rate pricing for Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway a two out of ten. It's really expensive.
What needs improvement with Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway?
Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway is not endpoint security. If we have a chance to change, we would change it because it is not user-friendly. The setup process is complex. You need to install FSM, whi...
What is your primary use case for Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway?
We have no big project, but we are trying to sell it in the market here. We are working with Forcepoint because there is no vendor working with this technology. If we have another vendor working wi...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Forcepoint SWG, Websense Web Security, Forcepoint TRITON
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Adventist Health, Alphawest, Amadori, Anoka County, Compartamos Banco, Davies Turner, EverBank, iGATE, Karlstad Municipality, Lake Michigan Credit Union, Scavolini, Smurfit Kappa, Toyota
Find out what your peers are saying about Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler vs. Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.
894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.