Claroty Platform vs Tanium comparison

Claroty and Tanium are both solutions in the Vulnerability Management category. Claroty is ranked #17 with an average rating of 8.2, while Tanium is ranked #21 with an average rating of 7.3. Claroty holds a 0.6% mindshare in VM, compared to Tanium’s 2.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Claroty users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 76% of Tanium users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Tanium and Claroty Platform are competing products in cybersecurity. Tanium has the upper hand in endpoint management due to its robust capabilities, while Claroty excels in industrial network security because of its specialized focus.

Features: Tanium offers endpoint visibility, real-time data collection, and rapid identification of security vulnerabilities. It provides extensive endpoint management and quick threat response, aiding comprehensive device insights. Claroty Platform delivers deep visibility in industrial networks, critical asset management, and threat detection tailored to operational technology. Its specialized security enhances industrial network operations and safeguards sensitive infrastructure.

Room for Improvement: Tanium could enhance its integration with industrial systems, improve its scalability for specific network types, and focus on strengthening its real-time analytics for industrial environments. Claroty Platform might improve in ease of deployment, simplify its learning curve for non-industrial experts, and streamline integration with broader IT systems. Additionally, better documentation and training resources would enhance user experience for both products.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Tanium stands out for straightforward deployment in enterprise settings, offering seamless integration and effective support services. Its infrastructure supports quick generalized deployments. Claroty Platform, although complex due to its industrial focus, provides tailored customer service to address industry-specific challenges. This approach benefits specialized industrial OT networks requiring dedicated assistance.

Pricing and ROI: Tanium involves a significant initial setup cost but promises substantial ROI through improved endpoint management efficiency. Claroty Platform typically has higher upfront costs due to its specialization, yet it is considered worthwhile for organizations prioritizing industrial cybersecurity, offering valuable ROI by protecting critical infrastructure.

To learn more, read our detailed Claroty Platform vs. Tanium Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Claroty Platform vs. Tanium

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 858,649 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Zafran Security

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Vulnerability Management category, the mindshare of Zafran Security is 0.7%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Claroty Platform is 0.6%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tanium is 2.7%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Vulnerability Management

Featured Reviews

Israel Cavazos Landini

Associate Director IT Security Operations at a pharma/biotech company with 10,001+ employees

Weekly insights and risk analysis facilitate informed security decisions

I appreciate the weekly insights Zafran provides, which include critical topics for networks and IT security, allowing us to evaluate which insights apply to our environment. The organization score feature is valuable to keep the leadership team updated on how our infrastructure fares security-wise. The applicable risk level versus base risk level feature is beneficial because prior to Zafran, we only used the base risk level, but now understand that risk depends on the asset itself. Zafran is an excellent tool.

Read full review

Deevanshi Priya

Cyber Security Security at PwC

Achieve certifications with progress tracking and potential for enhanced interactivity

I was using Claroty to complete training assigned by my company. The courses were self-paced and helped me get certified in two additional certifications. I plan to use it further as I have a task list for future courses. It was primarily for certification and study materials The feature I like…

Read full review

Ed Jarecki

Owner/Assistant Vice President at Jarecki Real Estate Investments/ EverView

A scalable solution that helps to understand how infrastructure works

We use the tool as an infrastructure operational management solution. The solution is scalable and helps to understand how infrastructure works. It helps to improve the health of the organization. Any movement into a SaaS solution has challenges since the processes and data flows are not well…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We saw benefits from Zafran Security almost immediately after deploying it."

"Zafran is an excellent tool."

"We are able to see the real risk of a vulnerability on our environment with our security tools."

"Zafran has become an indispensable tool in our cybersecurity arsenal."

"Overall, we have seen about eighty-seven percent reduction of the number of vulnerabilities that require urgency to remediate, specifically the number of criticals."

"Customer service is number one and the best."

"The platform ensures security without imposing significant delays."

"I like how the tool does passive and active discovery and threat detection and shows risks, recommendations, and vulnerabilities. It gives risk scores and gathers everything in one place - IP, device name, etc. We can integrate it with other tools for overall network mapping. It's useful for audits, compliance, and monitoring of all devices in the industry. It provides both monitoring and control. We also have SRA for incident response, which lets us search all alerts if we deploy the Claroty Platform."

"The solution's most valuable feature is the map, which shows everything that is connected and communicates with each other."

"I have had a very good experience with the Claroty Platform."

"Their SRA solution, the Secure Remote Access solution, is very useful for industrial environments."

"The solution offers comprehensive tools that greatly enhance your IT operations if implemented correctly."

"Claroty provides continuous threat protection and identifies pre-empty stuff and false positives."

More Claroty Platform pros

"Tanium’s linear-chain architecture is valuable."

"The solution is scalable and helps to understand how infrastructure works. It helps to improve the health of the organization."

"Tanium has made the process of detecting threats more proactive with its detection. So, the process is easier and more efficient."

"I would say Tanium is the best tool for vulnerability management."

"The most valuable features of this solution are the consolidation of all historical data on device endpoints, security drivers, firmware, and Software version gaps."

"I find the inventory and compliance features of Tanium to be the most impressive."

"When I push a quick update, it's done right away, and I can rescan immediately to confirm completion within minutes."

"Threat hunting is a very good feature on Tanium. We have just started using it and have not used it extensively."

More Tanium pros

Cons

"I think the ability to have some enhanced reporting capabilities is something they can improve on, as they have good reports but we have asked for some specific reporting enhancements."

"The dashboarding and reporting functionality of Zafran Security is an area that definitely could use some improvements."

"Initially, we were somewhat concerned about the scalability of Zafran due to our large asset count and the substantial amount of information we needed to process."

"I've reported four bugs and three feature requests so far. The main area of focus should be on how attacks are detected. The attack vector information needs to be more detailed. For example, it's not enough to state that an SMB v1 version open can lead to a WannaCry attack. A more detailed explanation should help clients understand the various ways an attack could occur."

"Claroty Platform could improve the pricing to get more acceptability in the market."

"For improvement, I think the training could be more practical. We have external training, but they're mostly theoretical. I want the solution to provide hands-on lab experience to help users learn better."

"The product could be improved in terms of user interface design."

"There should be AI security solutions implemented."

"The Claroty Platform becomes too noisy when it gives numerous CVEs related to vendor match. Sometimes, these CVEs are not actually related to the device in the firmware at the site."

"Claroty Platform only gives the vulnerabilities based on the make and model of the devices, so it doesn't provide any resolution or any detailed explanation of how one can resolve such issues."

"Introducing an AI chatbot to assist you when you have doubts could be beneficial."

More Claroty Platform cons

"We had some issues with the solution's OS upgrade."

"The solution needs to improve the reporting and tracking capabilities."

"Any movement into a SaaS solution has challenges since the processes and data flows are not well defined. Hence, you need to build it at the same time."

"When working with Tanium, there are some older devices that haven't been patched for a long time, and certain patches are not included in Tanium."

"When working with Tanium, there are some older devices that haven't been patched for a long time, and certain patches are not included in Tanium. I have to search outside to download patches, create bundles, and then perform the task."

"The solution lacks mobility."

"Most of the time, agent-relative issues have to be more equipped with self-healing features. At times, the agent is there, but for some reason, it doesn't report a status. It gives certain problems that are obviously agent-based."

"Tanium required local admin or root rights on Mac devices, which did not comply with our security policies. This made the solution less suitable for our restrictive environment."

More Tanium cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The licensing for physical devices is cheap, but the software version is expensive. The software version costs around 26-28 dollars. I was surprised and even double-checked. It was shocking."

"The tool is quite expensive."

"It's a bit expensive compared to other solutions."

"There is an annual license required to use this solution."

"Tanium is a more expensive solution in Latin America than some of the competitors, such as BigFix."

"The solution is expensive but it's a good investment."

"It is higher than some competitors in the market."

"The product's pricing differs from region to region depending on negotiations and the number of endpoints."

"It's an expensive solution. It would be nice if the cost were lower."

"The solution offers value for money."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

858,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

16%

Computer Software Company

13%

Energy/Utilities Company

Financial Services Firm

16%

Government

12%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zafran Security?

The current pricing of Zafran Security is fair overall. They were good to work with to accommodate our organization w...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Zafran Security?

The dashboarding and reporting functionality of Zafran Security is an area that definitely could use some improvement...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Zafran Security?

Zafran Security is helping reduce the amount of critical vulnerabilities in our environments that require prompt reme...

See all answers

Which solution do you prefer: Nozomi Networks or Claroty Platform?

Nozomi Networks and Claroty Platform are both leading operational technology (OT) security solutions offering a wide ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Claroty Platform?

The product helps mitigate potential threats, especially if its users have signature rules. The product also provides...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Claroty Platform?

Regarding the cons of the Claroty Platform, it is not about the deployment, but rather the identification. The Clarot...

See all answers

What do you like most about Tanium?

Tanium’s linear-chain architecture is valuable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Tanium?

While there is always room for improvement, I am pleased with Tanium.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Tanium?

The primary use case for Tanium ( /products/tanium-reviews ) is compliance, patching, and inventory as part of the co...

See all answers

Comparisons

Wiz Code vs Zafran Security

Compared 40% of the time

Vulcan Cyber vs Zafran Security

Compared 17% of the time

ServiceNow Security Operations vs Zafran Security

Compared 10% of the time

Tenable Vulnerability Management vs Zafran Security

Compared 8% of the time

Qualys VMDR vs Zafran Security

Compared 7% of the time

More Zafran Security Competitors

Nozomi Networks vs Claroty Platform

Compared 35% of the time

Tenable OT Security vs Claroty Platform

Compared 10% of the time

Dragos vs Claroty Platform

Compared 10% of the time

Armis vs Claroty Platform

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Defender for IoT vs Claroty Platform

Compared 5% of the time

More Claroty Platform Competitors

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Tanium

Compared 14% of the time

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Tanium

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Tanium

Compared 8% of the time

ServiceNow Discovery vs Tanium

Compared 6% of the time

BigFix vs Tanium

Compared 5% of the time

More Tanium Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM)

June 2025

Download Zafran Security product report

Buyer's Guide

Claroty Platform

June 2025

Download Claroty Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

Tanium

May 2025

Download Tanium product report

Overview

Zafran Security integrates with existing security tools to identify and mitigate vulnerabilities effectively, proving that most critical vulnerabilities are not exploitable, optimizing threat management.

Zafran Security introduces an innovative operating model for managing security threats and vulnerabilities. By leveraging the threat exposure management platform, it pinpoints and prioritizes exploitable vulnerabilities, reducing risk through immediate remediation. This platform enhances your hybrid cloud security by normalizing vulnerability signals and integrating specific IT context data, such as CVE runtime presence and internet asset reachability, into its analysis. No longer reliant on patch windows, Zafran Security allows you to manage risks actively.

What are the key features of Zafran Security?

Threat Exposure Management: Utilizes existing tools to prioritize vulnerabilities and manage threats.
Integrative Analysis: Combines security data with IT context for precise vulnerability management.
Real-time Risk Reduction: Enables immediate risk management without waiting for patches.
Hybrid Cloud Compatibility: Functions across diverse cloud environments for comprehensive security.

What benefits can users expect from Zafran Security?

Improved Security: Enhances protection by efficiently identifying and mitigating risks.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces unnecessary patching expenses by confirming non-exploitable vulnerabilities.
Time Savings: Frees developers to focus on root causes by handling immediate threats.
Comprehensive Insight: Offers a holistic view of security threats and vulnerabilities.

In industries where security is paramount, such as finance and healthcare, Zafran Security provides invaluable protection by ensuring that only exploitable vulnerabilities are addressed. It allows entities to maintain robust security measures while allocating resources efficiently, fitting seamlessly into existing security strategies.

Zafran Security

The Claroty Platform is tailored for monitoring and securing industrial control systems. It offers deep visibility into OT networks, enabling effective anomaly detection and vulnerability assessments. Its user-friendly interface and robust reporting tools facilitate easy management and compliance, enhancing organizational efficiency and cybersecurity posture in industrial environments.

Claroty

Tanium Endpoint Platform reduces security risk, improves agility & increases efficiency, a fundamentally new approach to endpoint security's threat detection, indicent response, vulnerability assessment and configuration compliance & with management's software distribution, asset utilization, asset inventory and patch management.

Tanium

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Rockwell Automation

JPMorgan Chase, eBay, Amazon, US Bank, MetLife, pwc, Cerner, Delphi, MGM Grand, New York Life

Buyer's Guide

Claroty Platform vs. Tanium

June 2025

Free Report: Claroty Platform vs. Tanium

Find out what your peers are saying about Claroty Platform vs. Tanium and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

858,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Claroty Platform vs. Tanium report.

See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors.

We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.