No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] vs Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall comparison

Why PeerSpot?
Citrix and Forcepoint are both solutions in the Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions category. Additionally, 90% of Citrix users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 79% of Forcepoint users who would recommend it.
Citrix SD-WAN [EOL]
Read 22 Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] reviews
    90% willing to recommend
    Forcepoint Next Generation ...
    Read 52 Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall reviews
    • 7,479 Views
    • 2,692 Comparison Views
    79% willing to recommend
     

    Comparison Buyer's Guide

    Download the report
    Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 12, 2025

    Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] and Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall compete in the network security domain. User reviews suggest that Forcepoint has the upper hand due to its extensive feature set and perceived value, despite Citrix offering better pricing and support.

    Features: Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] is known for its superior CIFS optimization, HDX WAN acceleration, and load balancing capabilities, enhancing branch communication and stability. In contrast, Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall is highlighted for its robust security features, including integrated multi-layer filtering, advanced threat protection, and centralized management.

    Room for Improvement: Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] needs improvements in reporting, customization, and competitive pricing options for varying markets. Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall could benefit from a more user-friendly interface, improved support services, and simpler deployment processes.

    Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] and Forcepoint favor on-premises deployments. However, Citrix's technical support receives mixed reviews with some delays in issue resolution, while Forcepoint requires skilled resources for deployment but maintains moderate support interactions.

    Pricing and ROI: Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] is viewed as costly but delivers good ROI by reducing MPLS expenses. Its pricing strategy, including perpetual licenses, offers financial management benefits. Conversely, Forcepoint's pricing is high against some competitors, though it offers flexibility in model choices with additional costs for extra features.

    DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
    To learn more, read our detailed Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions Report (Updated: October 2026).
    Buyer's Guide
    Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions
    October 2026
    Download the complete report
    Helped 920,223 peers since 2012

    Review summaries and opinions

    We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
     

    Categories and Ranking

    Citrix SD-WAN [EOL]
    Average Rating
    8.2
    Reviews Sentiment
    7.4
    Number of Reviews
    22
    Ranking in other categories
    No ranking in other categories
    Forcepoint Next Generation ...
    Average Rating
    7.6
    Reviews Sentiment
    6.5
    Number of Reviews
    52
    Ranking in other categories
    Firewalls (23rd), Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions (12th), WAN Edge (11th)
     

    Featured Reviews

    Sammy Mukuna - PeerSpot reviewer
    Sammy Mukuna
    Network Admin at Naivas Ltd
    Seamlessly combines Internet and MPLS
    Citrix has made my work easier and more cost-effective. It lowered our Internet costs and gave me the flexibility to choose providers based on each location's connectivity. Unlike before, I'm not tied to a specific provider. The central deployment feature allows easy configuration updates for all boxes from the head office, streamlining network management. This simplification has been a big plus for our operations.
    Read full review
    Ajit Pratap Kundan - PeerSpot reviewer
    Ajit Pratap Kundan
    Manager Solution Consulting at Accops Systems Pvt Ltd
    Unified security management has improved traffic control and simplified remote workforce access
    Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall does help in vulnerability identification and response by providing a single unified console through which I am able to monitor and manage infrastructure. The URL filtering capability of Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall helps in blocking malicious sites. We have to take care of both known threats and unknown threats. The firewall takes care of known threats, and we protect ourselves from unknown threats such as malicious code and malware that we cannot create firewall rules for. With these routing capabilities and policies, only whitelisted things get processed or passed. The biggest advantages of Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall, especially as a partner, service provider, and integrator, are that it is very easy to integrate these APIs with our solution, and most of the features I am getting in the clientless mode. Even with the client mode, it is easy to integrate with our client, allowing the customer to get a single client to address all the features of the firewall as well as the GTNA perspective. The flexibility of deployment, especially for the government and defense sectors, is that they want an on-premises solution, while the rest of the PSUs or enterprise segment are comfortable with the cloud offering, which is the SaaS offering and the way to go in the future.
    Read full review

    Quotes from Members

    We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
     

    Pros

    "The most valuable feature is security, as it gives me the port bindings that cannot be accomplished using other solutions."
    "The VPN and the load balancing are the most valuable features."
    "The solution's most valuable feature is load balancing."
    "The zero-touch deployment is most valuable for us."
    "It lowered our Internet costs and gave me the flexibility to choose providers based on each location's connectivity."
    "We are using it widely for the local record for SaaS-based applications. Another valuable feature is a local breakout."
    "The solution is brilliant, the way it calculates its paths and trails is great."
    "The reliability of connectivity is most valuable."
    More Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] pros
    "This solution is very reliable."
    "Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall's IPS feature has four operational modes, including IPS, Layer 2 and Layer 3 Firewalls, and the IPS mode offers many controls, profiles, and signatures for inspecting traffic while allowing for applying firewall rules followed by IPS engine inspection so that many decisions including blocking and controlling traffic actions are possible."
    "The URL filtering is the most valuable aspect of the product."
    "Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall is quite affordable, cheaper than other brands like Palo Alto or Check Point, with a lot of capabilities, very stable, and very well-made, making it a really good product for its price when compared to other vendors."
    "Forcepoint is stable and we plan to continue using it in the future."
    "The blocking, based on the signal provided, is the solution's most valuable aspect."
    "We like the scalability of Forcepoint because with the Forcepoint NGFW solution, we can scale anything. The solution has central management, so we can manage all the branches and devices centrally in one controller."
    "It's a nice product. I haven't come across anything that needs to be improved."
    More Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall pros
     

    Cons

    "There are a few things that can be improved, are domain-based routing and the slowness of virtual parts, and it may be due to the wrong configuration, which we have been unable to find out."
    "Customer Service: Not great - the first line support for this product is pretty much nil."
    "Even though the monitoring is pretty good, there is some room for improvement there."
    "Citrix should continue to offer a perpetual licensing model because it is very important to us."
    "Given that Citrix SD-WAN solved all our problems by providing us with everything we needed to unify communications with our branches and data centers, I cannot suggest anything further in terms of improvements."
    "I would like to see more customization to adjust for the WAN lock-out due to our unexpected power outages."
    "Enhancements are needed to improve the stability."
    "The communication around the life cycle would have been really helpful. The main issue we have had is related to the life cycle because some of the things that we are using were discontinued. They were discontinued within a year after we had purchased it, which is a bit painful. If we had known that, we would've made some other decisions."
    More Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] cons
    "Intel could ditch the Java-based GUI rendering and could use some serious revamp on the way they manage their GUI."
    "Management could be better. They can improve the management."
    "The centralized management console of Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall is something we have been struggling with because everybody has their own approach, but most customers have mixed solutions."
    "We feel the product's technical support could be better, as this relates to the solution itself, to the installation of the product, and to having a proper understanding of the case."
    "The optimization is not really ready."
    "Its interface is complex when compared with a firewall like FortiGate. Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall needs a management console, whereas FortiGate doesn't need any console. When you have a few devices, a console is not really necessary. It's good to have a private console only when you have a lot of devices."
    "I would like to see more sizing in the next release, and the roadmap should be clear."
    "My team is looking for more throughput and better integration with our security framework."
    More Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall cons
     

    Pricing and Cost Advice

    "It's a little bit on the high side compared to the other products."
    "It is a bit expensive. A cheaper product would be good, but everybody likes things to be cheaper. We bought the devices up front, and then we pay for the annual support."
    "It would be helpful to have a demo license available for customers who want to prove the concept and conduct a proof of concept (POC) before committing to the solution. This is particularly important for customers in Egypt who often require a demonstration of the solution's features and compatibility with their needs before making any investment or incurring costs. Providing a demo license would allow customers to assess whether the solution would meet their needs or not."
    "The price of the subscription should be cheaper."
    "I believe that Citrix SD-WAN is a good investment, but I do not have the information to be more specific."
    "The license was a one-time purchase. It's expensive."
    "The price is relatively expensive."
    "As NetScaler is now, I find it quite pricey."
    More Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] pricing and cost advice
    "It is expensive."
    "It is an affordable product. We purchase its yearly license."
    "We have just a subscription for the cloud, and this license is great. The license is so good."
    "The solution is expensive."
    "There is a need to make payments towards the licensing charges attached to the product. The product is not expensive."
    "We have found the price could be reduced. It is a little expensive."
    "There is a license required to use this solution and we can purchase it for one, two, three, or five years."
    "The training that they offer to their end-customers. It's quite expensive, I believe it costs roughly $11,000"
    More Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall pricing and cost advice
    report
    See which vendors are best for you
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions solutions are best for your needs.
    See recommendations
    920,223 professionals have used our research since 2012.
     

    Top Industries

    By visitors reading reviews
    Outsourcing Company
    16%
    Construction Company
    15%
    Financial Services Firm
    13%
    Comms Service Provider
    8%
    Construction Company
    11%
    Outsourcing Company
    11%
    Manufacturing Company
    10%
    Financial Services Firm
    10%
     

    Company Size

    By reviewers
    Large Enterprise
    Midsize Enterprise
    Small Business
    By reviewers
    Company SizeCount
    Small Business7
    Midsize Enterprise5
    Large Enterprise10
    By reviewers
    Company SizeCount
    Small Business29
    Midsize Enterprise11
    Large Enterprise14
     

    Questions from the Community

    Ask a question
    Earn 20 points
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall?
    In terms of price, I would say Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall is not expensive. It is very much comparable to other vendors, and pricing is not a problem, especially for the Asian market, with...
    See all answers
    What needs improvement with Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall?
    The negative side of Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall is that the ZTNA part is missing. For that, we have to integrate a third-party component with Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall to complet...
    See all answers
    What is your primary use case for Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall?
    The major use cases for Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall are in government turnkey projects where we require a lot of traffic coming from the public domain. That is why we are putting these fire...
    See all answers
     

    Comparisons

    Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN Platform vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] Logo
    Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN Platform vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL]
    Compared 15% of the time
    Prisma SD-WAN vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] Logo
    Prisma SD-WAN vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL]
    Compared 12% of the time
    Exinda vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] Logo
    Exinda vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL]
    Compared 5% of the time
    Fortinet FortiGate vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] Logo
    Fortinet FortiGate vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL]
    Compared 5% of the time
    Steelhead vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] Logo
    Steelhead vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL]
    Compared 5% of the time
    More Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] Competitors
    Fortinet FortiGate vs Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall Logo
    Fortinet FortiGate vs Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall
    Compared 9% of the time
    Sophos Firewall vs Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall Logo
    Sophos Firewall vs Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall
    Compared 7% of the time
    Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN vs Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall Logo
    Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN vs Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall
    Compared 6% of the time
    Cisco Meraki MX vs Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall Logo
    Cisco Meraki MX vs Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall
    Compared 5% of the time
    Cisco Secure Firewall vs Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall Logo
    Cisco Secure Firewall vs Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall
    Compared 5% of the time
    More Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall Competitors
     

    Product Reports

    Buyer's Guide
    Citrix SD-WAN [EOL]
    October 2026
    Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] reportDownload Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] product report
    Buyer's Guide
    Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall
    October 2026
    Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall reportDownload Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall product report
     

    Also Known As

    Citrix CloudBridge, WOC, NetScaler SD-WAN
    Forcepoint NGFW, Stonesoft Next Generation Firewall, McAfee Network Security Platform, Intel Security Network Security Platform
     

    Overview

    Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] enhances connectivity and performance by optimizing bandwidth utilization, ensuring reliable communication across branch offices and headquarter data centers. It offers centralized management, efficient deployment options, and improved network reliability.

    Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] is designed for businesses seeking enhanced connectivity solutions that boost application performance while reducing costs. With HDX WAN Optimization and reliable Active-Active connectivity, it assures improved bandwidth management. Tailored for both cloud and on-premise deployments, it supports fast communication and seamless integration, making it user-friendly even for those with limited technical expertise. Security features and zero-touch deployments further enhance its appeal. However, users highlight areas needing improvement, such as configuration intuitiveness, pricing alignment for specific markets, and stability. Enhanced reporting, networking features, and technical support are desired. Integration with Windows, security elements like firewalls, and licensing clarity require attention to meet user expectations.

    What are the key features of Citrix SD-WAN [EOL]?
    • HDX WAN Optimization: Enhances application performance and traffic.
    • Load Balancing: Ensures efficient traffic distribution across networks.
    • Reliable Connectivity: Provides seamless failover and reduced costs through MPLS replacement.
    • Cloud Management: Simplifies deployment and management via the cloud.
    • Zero-Touch Deployment: Facilitates easy setup and provisioning.
    • Active-Active Lines: Optimizes bandwidth utilization and performance.
    • Backup Capabilities: Centralizes data management for security.
    What benefits should users look for in Citrix SD-WAN [EOL]?
    • Enhanced Connectivity: Improves stability and reduces downtime.
    • Cost Reduction: Efficiently decreases expenses by replacing MPLS.
    • Network Optimization: Offers better bandwidth for diverse communication types.
    • Secure Interconnectivity: Ensures secure and reliable network connections.
    • Management Flexibility: Supports cloud or on-premise deployment options.

    Industries benefit from Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] by leveraging its features to ensure stable, redundant connectivity between branches and data centers. Organizations experiencing frequent line failures or high reliance on bandwidth-heavy applications find it particularly useful. It caters to sectors needing reliable data management and enhanced networking.

    Citrix

    Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall offers robust network protection with features like URL filtering and advanced threat protection, ensuring comprehensive security and operational efficiency across various infrastructures.

    Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall integrates URL filtering and advanced threat protection, including intrusion prevention and DDoS prevention. The centralized management console provides application awareness, strong network segmentation, and SD-WAN capabilities. Its graphical interface enhances user experience, while efficient technical support and seamless integration offer stability and scalability. Companies use it for perimeter security, VPNs, and threat prevention, optimizing performance in diverse sectors.

    What are the key features of Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall?
    • URL Filtering: Provides robust protection against malicious sites.
    • Advanced Threat Protection: Includes IPS and DDoS prevention.
    • Centralized Management: Simplifies control across multiple devices.
    • Application Awareness: Enhances security policies.
    • Network Segmentation: Ensures strong internal security structures.
    • SD-WAN Capabilities: Optimizes wide area network configurations.
    What benefits should users expect when evaluating?
    • Operational Efficiency: Streamlined management with a centralized console.
    • Enhanced Security: Comprehensive threat protection and VPN solutions.
    • Scalability: Easily adapts to infrastructure growth.
    • Integration: Seamlessly works with existing architectures.

    Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall is widely implemented in sectors including finance, education, and government, offering security for data centers and managing remote access with IPsec VPN tunnels, SSL VPNs, and site-to-site connectivity. Companies appreciate its use for Unified Threat Management and automatic optimization, ensuring data security and efficient network performance.

    Forcepoint
     

    Sample Customers

    AIDS Healthcare Foundation, Cornerstone Home Lending Inc., Dallara, ecVision, Essar, Eurofred, Groupe Promutuel, HMSHost Corporation, Royal Caribbean Cruise Lines Ltd, Royal Caribbean International
    California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR)
    Buyer's Guide
    Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions
    October 2026
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Fortinet, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions. Updated: October 2026.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    920,223 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    See our list of best Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions vendors and best WAN Edge vendors.

    We monitor all Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.