Top 10 Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] Alternatives

4.1 out of 5

22 reviews
90% willing to recommend

Top Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Fortinet FortiGate, Cato SASE Cloud Platform, and Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] surpasses its competitors by offering superior application performance, seamless failover, and enhanced network visibility, ensuring reliable and optimized connectivity for enterprises.

Citrix Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Citrix, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Fortinet FortiGate

4.2 out of 5

Fortinet FortiGate

4.2 out of 5

Citrix SD-WAN prioritizes connectivity and load balancing, making it ideal for organizations seeking reliable communication and cost reduction. In comparison, Fortinet FortiGate offers strong security features, attracting enterprises focused on comprehensive protection with options like VPN and intrusion prevention.

Pricing

Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] often entails a higher initial setup cost, while Fortinet FortiGate is recognized for a more cost-effective installation.

View comparison

Pricing

Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] often entails a higher initial setup cost, while Fortinet FortiGate is recognized for a more cost-effective installation.

Cato SASE Cloud Platform

4.4 out of 5

Cato SASE Cloud Platform

4.4 out of 5

Citrix SD-WAN emphasizes connectivity and cost-efficiency, excelling in customization and scalability. In comparison, Cato SASE Cloud Platform provides robust security, offering simplicity and centralized management. Buyers might choose Citrix for stable WAN optimization or Cato for integrated security features and cloud compatibility.

Pricing

Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] has a moderate setup cost, whereas Cato SASE Cloud Platform offers a streamlined setup process with lower initial expenses, highlighting the latter's cost-efficiency advantage.

View comparison

Pricing

Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] has a moderate setup cost, whereas Cato SASE Cloud Platform offers a streamlined setup process with lower initial expenses, highlighting the latter's cost-efficiency advantage.

Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN

4.0 out of 5

Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN

4.0 out of 5

Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] excels in connectivity with cost-effective features like CIFS optimization and HDX WAN Optimization, supporting branch operations. In comparison, Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN provides robust security and connectivity with centralized management, ideal for cloud and hybrid environments.

Pricing

Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] has a higher setup cost compared to Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN, which is more cost-effective for initial deployment needs.

View comparison

Pricing

Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] has a higher setup cost compared to Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN, which is more cost-effective for initial deployment needs.

VMware VeloCloud SD-WAN

4.1 out of 5

VMware VeloCloud SD-WAN

4.1 out of 5

Citrix SD-WAN focuses on HDX WAN Optimization, load balancing, and security, catering to branch-to-data-center communication. In comparison, VMware VeloCloud prioritizes Dynamic Multipath Optimization and cloud integration, appealing to users seeking smoother traffic management and ease of setup.

Pricing

Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] offers straightforward setup with potentially higher initial costs, while VMware VeloCloud SD-WAN provides a more cost-effective setup option.

View comparison

Pricing

Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] offers straightforward setup with potentially higher initial costs, while VMware VeloCloud SD-WAN provides a more cost-effective setup option.

Prisma SD-WAN

4.3 out of 5

Prisma SD-WAN

4.3 out of 5

Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] offers features like CIFS optimization, load balancing, and easy cloud management suitable for users needing customization and simplicity. In comparison, Prisma SD-WAN provides application visibility and integration, ideal for complex environments needing robust control and security insights.

Pricing

Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] has a relatively straightforward setup cost, whereas Prisma SD-WAN often incurs a higher setup expense. Citrix's simpler cost structure contrasts with Prisma's comprehensive features, reflecting different priorities in the deployment process.

View comparison

Pricing

Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN Platform

4.3 out of 5

Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN Platform

4.3 out of 5

Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN excels in deployment flexibility and simple management through its single-controller architecture. In comparison, Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] is favored for its connectivity and reliability. Aruba's aggressive pricing offers competitive benefits, while Citrix's cost-effectiveness comes from eliminating MPLS circuits.

Pricing

Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN Platform has a streamlined setup cost, while Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] offers a more complex initial expenditure. The differences highlight the cost-efficient setup of Aruba compared to the comprehensive initial investment required by Citrix.

View comparison

Pricing

Versa Unified Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Platform

4.0 out of 5

Versa Unified Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Platform

4.0 out of 5

Citrix SD-WAN offers robust connectivity with features like CIFS optimization and application reliability, appealing for its cost-effectiveness and ease of integration, especially with cloud management. In comparison, Versa SASE excels in security integration and third-party compatibility, providing a comprehensive network solution.

Pricing

Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] offers a straightforward setup with competitive rates, while Versa Unified Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Platform presents a more complex implementation process, adding to the initial setup costs.

View comparison

Pricing

Steelhead

4.2 out of 5

Steelhead

4.2 out of 5

Steelhead excels in data compression and optimization, offering bandwidth savings and cost reductions. In comparison, Citrix SD-WAN enhances application reliability with effective load balancing, making it suitable for improving network performance and connectivity, particularly in multi-branch and cloud environments.

Pricing

Steelhead's setup costs are significantly higher, while Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] offers a more budget-friendly initial investment, contrasting Steelhead's higher entry barrier.

View comparison

Pricing

Steelhead's setup costs are significantly higher, while Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] offers a more budget-friendly initial investment, contrasting Steelhead's higher entry barrier.

Exinda

4.4 out of 5

Exinda

4.4 out of 5

Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] offers WAN optimization, scalability, and cloud deployment flexibility, appealing to enterprises seeking robust connectivity. In comparison, Exinda excels in granular traffic management and application layer control, suiting cost-conscious buyers prioritizing detailed throughput management and real-time monitoring.

Pricing

Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] typically incurs higher initial setup costs compared to Exinda, which offers a more cost-effective installation. Exinda's affordability stands out, particularly in environments where initial budget constraints are a decisive factor.

View comparison

Pricing

Talari

1 out of 5

Talari

1 out of 5

Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] attracts tech buyers with its pricing and ease of deployment. In comparison, Talari offers advanced features like dynamic path control, appealing to those seeking complex network solutions. Citrix emphasizes affordability, while Talari promises long-term performance benefits.

Pricing

Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] often incurs higher setup costs, while Talari is noted for more cost-effective implementation. This distinction makes Talari an attractive choice for budget-conscious organizations.

View comparison

Pricing

Show 1 more products

Related categories

WAN Optimization

Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions

WAN Edge