We performed a comparison between Citrix Gateway and Ivanti Secure Access based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Infrastructure VPN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution has good performance."
"It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled."
"The product enables us to collect logs from the systems."
"For our use case, it was scalable. There were at least 25 end users using this solution from remote locations. And once the connection was established, there weren't any complaints."
"Citrix Gateway is stable once I am connected."
"It's a stable solution while it's running. We don't have to work on it a lot. There are not many bugs, so it's easy to use if you deploy successfully. You can be sure of an uninterrupted solution for quite a long time. Citrix is a good product."
"It performs quite well."
"The features that we have found most valuable are the web app support and VPN."
"The solution has very flexible configuration."
"The technical support is very responsive and fast"
"The scalability of Pulse Client is good."
"The most valuable feature of Pulse Client is integration with Google authenticator for two-factor authentication."
"There must be a more easy-to-use GUI."
"We have experienced issues relating to multi-factor authentication"
"We are currently looking at automation. It would be good if there is some way to automate it in a fast way. It should be easy to automate. It also has some security issues."
"As Citrix Gateway is a third party solution, we wish to have one which is more integrated and involves less administration."
"I'd like to see support for reverse proxy and more security features."
"The load balancing could be improved."
"As an organization, our initiative is to move to the cloud, Citrix Gateway needs to improve its cloud capabilities and make the cloud solution more robust."
"Sometimes the input-output has issues."
"If the solution had a more advanced DNS, it would be an improvement."
"Pulse Client could improve the system tokens for authentication."
"Pulse Client could improve the reports. The reports are not in PDF and we can't check the details in the reports of users who are using the VPNs."
Citrix Gateway is ranked 11th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 33 reviews while Ivanti Secure Access is ranked 28th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 2 reviews. Citrix Gateway is rated 8.2, while Ivanti Secure Access is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Citrix Gateway writes "Provided the ability for remote work during the pandemic". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ivanti Secure Access writes "Integrates well, highly reliable, but lacking reporting". Citrix Gateway is most compared with F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM), Fortinet FortiClient, Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, Ivanti Connect Secure and Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client, whereas Ivanti Secure Access is most compared with Ivanti Connect Secure, NetMotion Mobility, Tailscale, Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway and Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client. See our Citrix Gateway vs. Ivanti Secure Access report.
See our list of best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
