We performed a comparison between Citrix Endpoint Management and VMware Workspace ONE based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, VMware, ManageEngine and others in UEM (Unified Endpoint Management)."The security-related tools are excellent; these features allow us to secure devices, lock them down, and ensure compliance."
"The synchronization of Intune with other Microsoft solutions is a valuable feature."
"We have one MDM that works with Windows, iOS, and Android."
"The most valuable feature of Intune is the central dashboard for compliance and policy management."
"Configuration profiles, remediation, scripts, and auto-pilot features are very good."
"The performance of Microsoft Intune is good."
"While I don't think you can ever have full visibility and control, Intune certainly allows us to see the applications being used and tells us if things like Windows patches aren't applied to machines. It does a good job. That visibility makes life a little easier."
"Autopilot is the most valuable feature."
"The MAM applications of the product are great."
"A valuable feature of Citrix Endpoint Management is that it's stable. The stability is not a challenge among the move to the cloud."
"ShareFile, in particular, is valuable with its ease of sharing, and the best category security that is in the hands of users."
"The product is capable of acting in many different ways to help secure architecture."
"We have seen improvements in compliance management on the devices."
"The remote management and location capabilities are good."
"The initial setup is easy and the deployment doesn't take too long."
"Sometimes, we face an issue and raise a ticket. The technical support team is fantastic and resolves the issue."
"The most valuable feature of VMware Workspace ONE is its reliability."
"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"The solution has very good documentation."
"The most valuable feature is policy-driven control of the devices."
"The bigger vendors like VMware, Insight, and MobileIron can assign engineers to customers. You can work with them to develop the right competency to use the product."
"The solution can have some compliance problems in general and the end-point user can bypass easily the company policies in Intune."
"The solution could improve by having better integration with Apple."
"There needs to be more support for Mac operating systems."
"The product needs to upgrade itself when the server is overloaded."
"What would make this product better is adding more security policies and features in the next upgrade."
"It would really be helpful to have the option to manage server operating systems as well, like Windows Server, at least. That way, we could scrap the use of SCCM, which requires a lot of on-premises infrastructure."
"The installation is very easy. However, to be able to configure it you will need special knowledge, such as training or self-studies to have a proper level of security. There are many settings one has to understand before being able to implement Microsoft Intune."
"It would be helpful if there was proactive remediation."
"Support for inventory management of Apple devices should be added."
"Citrix needs to improve the architecture. They also need to strengthen the application integration. They keep referring to some things to be required as security, and they keep selling the next level and on-premise separately. They should give the customer the opportunity to decide whether they want to use the next level on-premise or on-cloud, but they should not charge additional fees if the customer wants to deploy the next level on-premise because the customer is already being charged as the end user. They should allow next level on-premise optimization without any additional charges."
"Requires integrating with ABM before enabling some of the features."
"The tool’s battery usage was high."
"AirWatch doesn't seem to empower IT admins to try new things or get creative with implementations."
"When it comes to deployment and maintaining security, there should be an integrated console where you have a singular view of all of the products from the same OEM."
"The bigger vendors like VMware, Insight, and MobileIron can assign engineers to customers. You can work with them to develop the right competency to use the product."
"They need a more flexible pricing model."
"There could be ease of integration within the environment. I didn't have any issues when using it, but the integration part was a bit difficult for the other team."
"We'd like the customization to be better."
"Patching, fixing, and training for VMware Workspace ONE are areas that need to be improved."
"There are some bugs that our team needs to work around. It required some API integration required because visitor integration was not there. For example, we are currently working on a tunnel issue, and VMware doesn't have this solution."
Citrix Endpoint Management is ranked 7th in UEM (Unified Endpoint Management) with 1 review while VMware Workspace ONE is ranked 2nd in UEM (Unified Endpoint Management) with 27 reviews. Citrix Endpoint Management is rated 8.2, while VMware Workspace ONE is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Citrix Endpoint Management writes "A scalable solution that is easy to deploy and improves compliance management of devices". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware Workspace ONE writes "Quick to set up and easy to implement platform for monitoring and managing mobile endpoints". Citrix Endpoint Management is most compared with ManageEngine Endpoint Central, CyberArk Identity, MOBI, Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) and Ivanti Endpoint Manager, whereas VMware Workspace ONE is most compared with VMware Horizon, Jamf Pro, SOTI MobiControl and Citrix Workspace.
See our list of best UEM (Unified Endpoint Management) vendors.
We monitor all UEM (Unified Endpoint Management) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.