Cisco UCS Director vs CloudM Manage comparison

Cisco and CloudM are both solutions in the Cloud Management category. Cisco is ranked #21 with an average rating of 8.0, while CloudM is ranked #76. Cisco holds a 1.9% mindshare in CM, compared to CloudM’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 73% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution.

Cisco UCS Director

Read 15 Cisco UCS Director reviews

974 Views
945 Comparison Views

73% willing to recommend

CloudM Manage

Read 1 CloudM Manage review

162 Views
162 Comparison Views

0% willing to recommend

Cisco UCS Director

CloudM Manage

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cisco UCS Director and CloudM Manage based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Nutanix, Broadcom, IBM and others in Cloud Management.

To learn more, read our detailed Cloud Management Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Management

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 882,180 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco UCS Director

Ranking in Cloud Management

21st

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

CloudM Manage

Ranking in Cloud Management

76th

Average Rating

3.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Cloud Management category, the mindshare of Cisco UCS Director is 1.9%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of CloudM Manage is 0.3%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Cisco UCS Director	1.9%
CloudM Manage	0.3%
Other	97.8%

Cloud Management

Featured Reviews

ErnieRumfield

Senior Telecommunications Engineer at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

Managing extensive VoIP services becomes efficient and seamless

We use Cisco UCS Director primarily for managing our VoIP service to maintain seamless service delivery. We operate in an enterprise government environment Cisco UCS Director is straightforward to use, which we greatly appreciate. It helps save time by making it quicker to roll out new call…

Read full review

Kumaravadivel Palani

Sr.Engr.Information Technology at Advik Hi-Tech Pvt Ltd

Performance is relatively poor and speed needs improvement

We use CloudM to store our employees' details We use it for backup storage only. In the future, my company may go for the testing on Cloud because it has a large infrastructure. The feature I like most is its stability. In terms of improvement, the performance of the solution should be made…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Feature-wise, the solution helps one to add multiple environments in one place...It is a scalable product."

"Cisco's knowledge base is extensive."

"The solution is helpful for centralized management."

"A product that really aids in systems management without complexity."

"This is a user-friendly solution that is very good and easy to use."

"Cisco UCS Director is straightforward to use, which we greatly appreciate."

"Better visibility and better control are the main benefits people receive from Cisco UCS Director; the automation and the orchestration part, these three to four points are the key factors to decide on Cisco UCS Director."

"The reason we went with Cisco is that it comes at a very negligible cost as part of the BOQ. Compared to the competition's products, which are incredibly expensive, UCS Director is low-cost."

More Cisco UCS Director pros

"CloudM has good stability and scalability."

Cons

"Simplifying the user interface would go a long way to making it more usable."

"Normally, UCS Director is used primarily for orchestration, but when we look at a non-Cisco data infrastructure components, the UCS Director needs a bit more improvement in terms of integration with third-party systems and with existing older systems."

"We cannot depend on this solution to manage all of the data center's infrastructure."

"The product could allow more programmatic opportunities through better development of the API."

"There are a lot of bugs in the solution. This is an area in the solution that can be improved."

"The tool should be a lot more intuitive and make it easy for us to understand and migrate."

"Currently, Cisco UCS Director is unable to integrate with another product or with a server from another brand."

"There aren’t any areas of improvement that immediately come to mind."

More Cisco UCS Director cons

"CloudM is slow compared to other solutions."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Cisco UCS Director is expensive...I rate the solution's pricing a three out of ten."

"I would rate the product's pricing an eight out of ten."

"The budget doesn’t work for the state and local governments."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is a low price and ten is a high price, I rate the pricing around five to six out of ten."

"The cost of this solution is significant."

"I rate Cisco UCS Director's price a three out of ten. Cisco UCS Director is not an affordable product. With Cisco UCS Director, there is a need to pay an overall price, which consists of the product, software, and support."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

882,180 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

16%

Computer Software Company

12%

Marketing Services Firm

11%

Comms Service Provider

10%

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	11

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco UCS Director?

While the pricing might be seen as expensive, it provides value for money due to reliable service and excellent technical support.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cisco UCS Director?

It should be more of a cloud-based architecture for Cisco UCS Director, and it should be affordable to small customers as well because the pricing is a major challenge when we talk about Cisco UCS ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cisco UCS Director?

Mainly in my region and country, large data center customers are using Cisco UCS Director, not the SMB or mid-market customers. More of the on-premise customers are utilizing Cisco UCS Director. Th...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Cisco Intersight vs Cisco UCS Director

Compared 16% of the time

VMware Aria Automation vs Cisco UCS Director

Compared 16% of the time

OpenNebula vs Cisco UCS Director

Compared 8% of the time

VMware Cloud Director vs Cisco UCS Director

Compared 8% of the time

Abiquo vs Cisco UCS Director

Compared 7% of the time

More Cisco UCS Director Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS Director

February 2026

Download Cisco UCS Director product report

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Management

January 2026

Download CloudM Manage product report

Also Known As

No data available

CloudM CloudManager

Overview

Cisco UCS Director enables automated delivery of physical and virtual data center resources, empowering data centers to move at the speed of business.

Cisco

At CloudM we are on a mission to create the world’s leading migration and management platform that enables organizations of all sizes to get more out of the cloud. More productive people, more for your money and a more secure future.

CloudM

Sample Customers

Entel, Data#3, Cegal, NESIC, LightEdge

Information Not Available

Find out what your peers are saying about Nutanix, Broadcom, IBM and others in Cloud Management. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

882,180 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.