Cisco UCS Director vs CloudM Manage comparison

Cisco and CloudM are both solutions in the Cloud Management category. Cisco is ranked #21 with an average rating of 8.0, while CloudM is ranked #76. Cisco holds a 1.9% mindshare in CM, compared to CloudM’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 73% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution.

Cisco UCS Director

Read 15 Cisco UCS Director reviews

974 Views
945 Comparison Views

73% willing to recommend

CloudM Manage

Read 1 CloudM Manage review

162 Views
162 Comparison Views

0% willing to recommend

Cisco UCS Director

CloudM Manage

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cisco UCS Director and CloudM Manage based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Nutanix, Broadcom, IBM and others in Cloud Management.

To learn more, read our detailed Cloud Management Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Management

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,515 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco UCS Director

Ranking in Cloud Management

21st

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

CloudM Manage

Ranking in Cloud Management

76th

Average Rating

3.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Cloud Management category, the mindshare of Cisco UCS Director is 1.9%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of CloudM Manage is 0.3%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Cisco UCS Director	1.9%
CloudM Manage	0.3%
Other	97.8%

Cloud Management

Featured Reviews

ErnieRumfield

Senior Telecommunications Engineer at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

Managing extensive VoIP services becomes efficient and seamless

We use Cisco UCS Director primarily for managing our VoIP service to maintain seamless service delivery. We operate in an enterprise government environment Cisco UCS Director is straightforward to use, which we greatly appreciate. It helps save time by making it quicker to roll out new call…

Read full review

Kumaravadivel Palani

Sr.Engr.Information Technology at Advik Hi-Tech Pvt Ltd

Performance is relatively poor and speed needs improvement

We use CloudM to store our employees' details We use it for backup storage only. In the future, my company may go for the testing on Cloud because it has a large infrastructure. The feature I like most is its stability. In terms of improvement, the performance of the solution should be made…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I can manage multiple workloads whether it's on AWS, Azure, or on-premises. They can be managed by using the UCS Director."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is the fabric sharing."

"Cisco's knowledge base is extensive."

"UCS director enables us to be more productive and more agile, and also more self-sufficient because we don't have to depend on anybody else."

"The solution is helpful for centralized management."

"The product is flexible and compact. It has a lot of features."

"Cisco UCS Director is straightforward to use, which we greatly appreciate."

"An easy and strong configuration, along with its low cost, are some of the features of the solution."

More Cisco UCS Director pros

"CloudM has good stability and scalability."

Cons

"There could be an improvement with the integration with the newest solutions from other vendors' technologies."

"The areas where this product can be improved are the integrations and the UI. These features are not as friendly compared to VMware products."

"I would like to see more integration with other solutions."

"Currently, Cisco UCS Director is unable to integrate with another product or with a server from another brand."

"It is not easy to add or expand the product."

"There are a lot of bugs in the solution. This is an area in the solution that can be improved."

"The product could allow more programmatic opportunities through better development of the API."

"Simplifying the user interface would go a long way to making it more usable."

More Cisco UCS Director cons

"CloudM is slow compared to other solutions."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Cisco UCS Director is expensive...I rate the solution's pricing a three out of ten."

"The budget doesn’t work for the state and local governments."

"The cost of this solution is significant."

"I would rate the product's pricing an eight out of ten."

"I rate Cisco UCS Director's price a three out of ten. Cisco UCS Director is not an affordable product. With Cisco UCS Director, there is a need to pay an overall price, which consists of the product, software, and support."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is a low price and ten is a high price, I rate the pricing around five to six out of ten."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,515 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

16%

Computer Software Company

12%

Marketing Services Firm

11%

Comms Service Provider

10%

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	11

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco UCS Director?

While the pricing might be seen as expensive, it provides value for money due to reliable service and excellent technical support.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cisco UCS Director?

It should be more of a cloud-based architecture for Cisco UCS Director, and it should be affordable to small customers as well because the pricing is a major challenge when we talk about Cisco UCS ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cisco UCS Director?

Mainly in my region and country, large data center customers are using Cisco UCS Director, not the SMB or mid-market customers. More of the on-premise customers are utilizing Cisco UCS Director. Th...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Cisco Intersight vs Cisco UCS Director

Compared 18% of the time

VMware Aria Automation vs Cisco UCS Director

Compared 17% of the time

VMware Cloud Director vs Cisco UCS Director

Compared 9% of the time

OpenNebula vs Cisco UCS Director

Compared 9% of the time

Morpheus vs Cisco UCS Director

Compared 7% of the time

More Cisco UCS Director Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS Director

January 2026

Download Cisco UCS Director product report

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Management

January 2026

Download CloudM Manage product report

Also Known As

No data available

CloudM CloudManager

Overview

Cisco UCS Director enables automated delivery of physical and virtual data center resources, empowering data centers to move at the speed of business.

Cisco

At CloudM we are on a mission to create the world’s leading migration and management platform that enables organizations of all sizes to get more out of the cloud. More productive people, more for your money and a more secure future.

CloudM

Sample Customers

Entel, Data#3, Cegal, NESIC, LightEdge

Information Not Available

Find out what your peers are saying about Nutanix, Broadcom, IBM and others in Cloud Management. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,515 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.