We performed a comparison between Cisco Wireless and Mojo Networks based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Wireless LAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution is pretty generic and easy to use."
"The simplicity is great."
"The most useful feature of Juniper Wireless AP is the reporting Marvis."
"The stability of the solution is good."
"The ability to make different types of networks, such as land networks, is the most valuable part of the solution."
"The solution offers very good stability."
"I like that it's a standard wireless solution that can be rolled out throughout the campus. I also like that it is easy to manage. It is a good end-to-end solution."
"The initial setup is easy. It's fairly quick to deploy."
"The LAN network conductivity is good."
"From my experience, I have found Cisco Wireless to be scalable."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"Mojo Networks (Arista WiFi) is extremely secure with WIPS, built-in wireless."
"The security is a valuable feature."
"The configuration is simple and the reports can be automated."
"Initial setup was straightforward."
"I need a bit more time with it before criticizing the features."
"Juniper Wireless AP can improve by continually improving its reporting and integration with other systems."
"If you want to do more specific stuff, it's a bit limited."
"Their software's really clunky."
"We've recently had hardware issues which have caused us some problems."
"The pricing of Brazil is very expensive. When you look at other options, they are much cheaper."
"We use a Cisco product called Room Kit for meetings. It would be nice if Cisco could improve that. I would also like a cloud solution."
"They are a pretty expensive option."
"The reporting of the product could be improved. When I needed to troubleshoot, I couldn't get sufficient information from the controller."
"For all products on the market, the availability of the products may not be ideal. We're waiting on a lot of products simply due to the fact that there's a material shortage. We've ordered products and have had to wait three or four months for anything to get delivered. This is not just Cisco. It's a problem on the market for all components which include semiconductors."
"The solution could improve by having more advanced features, such as AI that is able to do diagnosis on the network or detect incorrect configurations and is able to tell you what is the recommended practice. Additionally, it would be a benefit to have smart antennas that are able to track your movement, Wi-Fi 6 support, better transfer rates, low latency, stronger signals that can penetrate thick walls, and zero packet losses."
"Something that could be improved is the ability to easily and quickly see what speed someone is on and if there are any issues on the network. We are using the older software technology, so maybe their newest version is able to do that."
"The setup was complex."
"My only complaint about this product is its availability. Not many people can stock it and ordering from overseas is a challenge."
"The renewal costs that come with it are very expensive."
More Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cisco Wireless is ranked 3rd in Wireless LAN with 69 reviews while Mojo Networks is ranked 21st in Wireless LAN with 4 reviews. Cisco Wireless is rated 8.2, while Mojo Networks is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of Cisco Wireless writes "Robust with a good level of performance and very helpful technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mojo Networks writes "Secure built-in wireless, stable, scalable, and has the best support". Cisco Wireless is most compared with Aruba Wireless, Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, Ruckus Wireless and Ubiquiti WLAN, whereas Mojo Networks is most compared with Fortinet FortiWLM, Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, Aruba Wireless, Mist AI and Cloud and ExtremeCloud IQ. See our Cisco Wireless vs. Mojo Networks report.
See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
