Arista Campus LAN Switches vs HPE ProCurve comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Arista and Hewlett Packard Enterprise are both solutions in the LAN Switching category. Arista is ranked #7 with an average rating of 10.0, while Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #5 with an average rating of 9.0. Arista holds a 5.6% mindshare in LS, compared to Hewlett Packard Enterprise’s 10.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Arista users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users who would recommend it.

Arista Campus LAN Switches

Read 8 Arista Campus LAN Switches reviews

1,454 Views
1,454 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

HPE ProCurve

Read 39 HPE ProCurve reviews

2,936 Views
2,936 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Arista Campus LAN Switches

HPE ProCurve

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 8, 2026

HPE ProCurve and Arista Campus LAN Switches compete in the networking space. HPE ProCurve offers better pricing and support, while Arista excels with advanced features and performance.

Features: HPE ProCurve provides a robust security setup, easy integration with existing systems, and a user-friendly interface. Arista Campus LAN Switches offer high throughput, excellent scalability for large networks, and advanced automation, enhancing network programmability.

Room for Improvement: HPE ProCurve could enhance its automation capabilities and integration flexibility for more dynamic network environments. Better scalability features and programmability would benefit larger implementations. Arista might improve its support services and ease of use for new users. Simplifying initial setup and offering more competitive pricing could broaden its appeal.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HPE ProCurve is renowned for straightforward deployment and effective customer support, ensuring quick issue resolution. Arista's sophisticated deployment model allows for seamless integration with various infrastructures, minimizing disruptions and optimizing network performance.

Pricing and ROI: HPE ProCurve attracts budget-conscious buyers with lower setup costs and a strong ROI through competitive pricing. Arista Campus LAN Switches, though initially more expensive, provide significant ROI over time by delivering superior performance and scalability, appealing to those who prioritize long-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed Arista Campus LAN Switches vs. HPE ProCurve Report (Updated: November 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Arista Campus LAN Switches vs. HPE ProCurve

November 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 921,523 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Arista Campus LAN Switches

Ranking in LAN Switching

7th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

HPE ProCurve

Ranking in LAN Switching

5th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the LAN Switching category, the mindshare of Arista Campus LAN Switches is 5.6%, up from 3.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of HPE ProCurve is 10.5%, down from 11.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

LAN Switching Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
HPE ProCurve	10.5%
Arista Campus LAN Switches	5.6%
Other	83.9%

LAN Switching

Featured Reviews

Denis Malinovtsev

Chief Technology Officer at ictbit

Unified monitoring has transformed campus deployments and provides rapid EVPN-VXLAN rollouts

Regarding improvements to Arista Campus LAN Switches, nothing comes to mind about the switches themselves; they are really fast and have all the technologies and protocols that exist in the market. However, on the management system, I would improve it because as a network engineer, I want a chatbot that can communicate in a native language with the monitoring system to get answers regarding my network faults. There are no problems particularly with the product, but there is room for improvement regarding licensing and the chatbot for all Arista products.

Read full review

Bronson Tillie

Ict And Managed Services Consultant at Wyntec

Experience seamless integration and responsive tech support for smooth operations

Amazon RDS is easy to use. It is somewhat pricier but manageable. It has easy tasks and integrates smoothly with frontend components. When using IDE services such as PgAdmin, the installation steps are straightforward. The availability is also high, which is why we use it. It offers easy scalability and migration between different configurations. RDS performs well overall. The main consideration is pricing, which is higher compared to alternatives such as DigitalOcean. For backup and restore operations, it takes slightly longer - approximately 2-3 minutes compared to 2 minutes with other providers. There are also more steps to follow compared to other service providers. The installation process is straightforward with no complex requirements. Users can directly select their desired database, memory requirements, and port numbers without complications.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The technology is scalable as much as you want."

"The Software Defined switch architecture, runs optimized 2-tier network instead of traditional 3-tier network (Core, Distribution and Access) gives you efficiency and savings."

"The template functionality saves a lot of time and man-hours, which results in cost and time savings."

"The solution's most valuable feature is its stability because Arista falls in an industry that is very similar to Cisco."

"The management portal has improved the way our organization functions."

"QoS is the most valuable feature because our clients work with VOIP and Critical applications."

"Clients are very satisfied with the implementation process."

"I use the solution for connectivity in data centers and LANs, providing Layer 2 and Layer 3 connectivity based on network needs."

More Arista Campus LAN Switches pros

"It's easy to manage and configure. The configurations can be exported and imported to another solution."

"This product is very stable; in the time that I have used it, over the past five and a half years, it's been rock solid."

"Compared with other solutions in the market, this product is great."

"It is easy to use and the main advantage is that we can connect to the system from anywhere directly."

"HPE ProCurve has plenty of features."

"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"It does what we want and it is reliable."

"HPE ProCurve is a stable solution; we have not had any issues with customers that have been using the solution for 10 to 15 years."

More HPE ProCurve pros

Cons

"The licensing cost is pretty heavy. That is something that they need to definitely work upon."

"One of the issues that we have been faced with here in Brazil is that we don't have any list times for delivery."

"It would be ideal if the solution was less expensive."

"I would like to see a version available with eight or sixteen ports."

"We have to renew the license every three years, which can be a challenge for customers. Arista, like other vendors, now follows a license-based system."

"The complex setup phase is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"I do think they could improve their licensing model. Today, I need to pay for a license, for a switch, for support, and it costs money; it is not cheap."

"I think there's still room for improvement. Arista Campus LAN Switches are not highly scalable as they are hardware-based. If hardware requirements exceed capacity, the product needs to be changed, which can impact service."

"The image of the solution has dropped in recent years due to HPE enterprise management."

"The dashboards could be improved and made more interesting."

"The only thing that I can find wrong with the product is the web interface."

"I don't have any recommendations for areas of improvement."

"HPE ProCurve's web interface is old, and I have to log in on each device separately, making them the product's shortcomings that need improvement."

"The pricing model could be improved in HPE ProCurve."

"If you make a change and you disconnect yourself from the switch, you will create an issue."

"These switches can be made more stable and robust."

More HPE ProCurve cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price is not that good, but our clients value the solution despite the price."

"The only licensing costs are for CloudVision, although the upfront price of the device is not cheap."

"The solution is more expensive than other vendors. There is hardware and software that needs to be purchased in some circumstance. The software can sometimes be expensive."

"I would rate the pricing a six out of ten, with one being very cheap and ten being very expensive."

"The product has a good price compared to other solutions."

"The product is reasonably priced."

"The licensing for HPE ProCurve is a one-time cost, though it's varied somewhat. What my company purchased was usually between $3,500 and $5,000 one-time cost."

"The price could be more competitive."

"There is no need to pay for the solution's license."

"HPE ProCurve price could improve. We have a three-year warranty."

More HPE ProCurve pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which LAN Switching solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

14%

Construction Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	1

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	18
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	11

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Arista Campus LAN Switches?

Regarding pricing, it is not cheap. While it is an enterprise solution, comparing it to low-level switches like Fortinet and Netgear, it is much more expensive. However, comparing it to Cisco and J...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Arista Campus LAN Switches?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Arista Campus LAN Switches?

I work as a consultant and integrator, using Arista Networks platform in my customers' networks. I deal with switches by Arista, which is mostly what we use Arista for. I am familiar with Arist...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HPE ProCurve?

We know DigitalOcean is more economical compared to AWS through conversations with DevOps teams. In AWS, as RDS tables and memory usage increase, the prices increase accordingly. For market-related...

See all answers

What needs improvement with HPE ProCurve?

Sometimes the machines get stuck or disconnected, requiring a restart. When connection issues occur, we need to contact the DigitalOcean service team to restart or reboot the system. There are issu...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for HPE ProCurve?

I have used S3 bucket to save files. I used the SQL database from AWS. We use AWS Relational Database Services (RDS) and EC2, which is Elastic Cloud Compute. These are the three services I have use...

See all answers

Comparisons

Cisco FabricPath vs Arista Campus LAN Switches

Compared 25% of the time

Cisco Catalyst Switches vs Arista Campus LAN Switches

Compared 21% of the time

Cisco Nexus vs Arista Campus LAN Switches

Compared 21% of the time

Dell PowerSwitch N-Series vs Arista Campus LAN Switches

Compared 10% of the time

Juniper QFabric vs Arista Campus LAN Switches

Compared 7% of the time

More Arista Campus LAN Switches Competitors

Enterasys Campus LAN Switches vs HPE ProCurve

Compared 18% of the time

Cisco Catalyst Switches vs HPE ProCurve

Compared 17% of the time

NETGEAR Switches vs HPE ProCurve

Compared 13% of the time

Aruba Instant On Switches vs HPE ProCurve

Compared 12% of the time

ExtremeSwitching vs HPE ProCurve

Compared 3% of the time

More HPE ProCurve Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

LAN Switching

October 2026

Download Arista Campus LAN Switches product report

Buyer's Guide

HPE ProCurve

October 2026

Download HPE ProCurve product report

Also Known As

No data available

ProCurve, HP ProCurve

Overview

Arista Campus LAN Switches offer efficient network integration and management, enhancing LAN deployment with superior telemetry and streamlined designs, delivering scalability and cost-efficiency.

Designed for effective deployment in network environments, Arista Campus LAN Switches utilize a Software Defined architecture that enhances network efficiency and provides savings with scalability. Responsible for fast EVPN-VXLAN deployment, these switches ensure superior telemetry capabilities while integrating seamlessly into networks through Arista EOS and open APIs. Their Quality of Service supports VOIP and critical applications. With CloudVision management and template functionality, deployment is simplified, reducing the need for excess hardware. Despite these advantages, enhancements in native language chatbot management, port options, and license renewal costs are desired by users. Scalability is affected by hardware constraints, and there is a call for faster delivery times and simplified setup.

What are the key features of Arista Campus LAN Switches?

CloudVision Management: Simplifies network operations through a centralized management platform.
EVPN-VXLAN Deployment: Facilitates rapid Layer 2 and 3 connectivity across the campus.
Superior Telemetry: Provides comprehensive network monitoring and insights.
Arista EOS & Open APIs: Ensures flexibility and interoperability within diverse networks.
Quality of Service: Optimizes performance for VOIP and critical applications.
Template Functionality: Reduces deployment costs through automated configurations.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Cost Efficiency: Reduces the number of switches required, saving operational costs.
Scalability: Enables effective network growth through software-defined capabilities.
Interoperability: Allows cohesive integration within existing network setups.
Productivity Boost: Simplifies maintenance and upgrades, leading to increased productivity.

Consultants and integrators utilize Arista Campus LAN Switches to enhance customer network environments, supporting both campus and data center needs. These switches are employed effectively by resellers for clients like community centers and are integral for system engineers managing Layer 2 and 3 connectivity. Deployment is streamlined using a controller-based template for efficient configuration across multiple sites.

Arista

HPE ProCurve offers a blend of cost-effectiveness, lifetime warranty, and user-friendly interfaces suitable for companies dealing with advanced networking demands.

HPE ProCurve provides reliable network solutions for businesses, healthcare, and educational organizations. Known for stability, scalability, and robust security features, it supports seamless VLAN configurations and efficient management. Its GUI and CLI ease the transition for users familiar with Cisco systems, enhancing network access control. Energy efficiency and competitive pricing further solidify its position as a dependable choice in network environments.

What are the key features of HPE ProCurve?

Cost-Effectiveness: Offers competitive pricing with substantial features.
Lifetime Warranty: Ensures long-term investment protection.
User-Friendly Interface: Simple GUI and CLI reminiscent of Cisco systems.
Scalability: Supports expansion needs with ease.
Security: Provides robust network protection measures.
Efficient Management: Streamlines backup and network configuration.
Energy Efficiency: Reduces operational costs with sustainable practices.
Multi-Vendor Integration: Facilitates compatibility with various systems.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Stability: Reliable performance for a variety of environments.
Scalability: Facilitates network expansion without major overhauls.
User Experience: Intuitive setup and management boost productivity.
Cost Savings: Affordable pricing delivers better ROI.
Energy Efficiency: Lowers utility expenses, promoting green practices.

HPE ProCurve is widely used across industries, connecting end-user devices like IP phones and printers as access switches, serving as the core network infrastructure. Companies rely on its capability to manage LAN and Wi-Fi connections efficiently, making it a preferred option for enhancing segmentation and control in networks of all sizes.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Sample Customers

University of Winchester, AWE, picturemaxx, Medical Mutual, Leonix, CloudEra, National Physical Laboratory, Tri-State G&T, AIS, Morph, SingTel, SDSC, BBC

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP, Cardinal Newman Catholic Secondary School, DY 4 Systems, EdgeWing, Edmonton Public Schools District, Halton Catholic District School Board, Hartwick College, Hatch Associates, Huntingdon College, Roseville Joint Union High School District, Saddleback Valley Unified School District, One Superior Place

Buyer's Guide

Arista Campus LAN Switches vs. HPE ProCurve

November 2026

Free Report: Arista Campus LAN Switches vs. HPE ProCurve

Find out what your peers are saying about Arista Campus LAN Switches vs. HPE ProCurve and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Arista Campus LAN Switches vs. HPE ProCurve report.

See our list of best LAN Switching vendors.

We monitor all LAN Switching reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.