Arista Campus LAN Switches vs HPE ProCurve comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Arista and Hewlett Packard Enterprise are both solutions in the LAN Switching category. Arista is ranked #7 with an average rating of 10.0, while Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #3 with an average rating of 9.0. Arista holds a 5.6% mindshare in LS, compared to Hewlett Packard Enterprise’s 10.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Arista users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users who would recommend it.

Arista Campus LAN Switches

Read 8 Arista Campus LAN Switches reviews

1,209 Views
1,209 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

HPE ProCurve

Read 39 HPE ProCurve reviews

2,512 Views
2,512 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Arista Campus LAN Switches

HPE ProCurve

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

HPE ProCurve and Arista Campus LAN Switches are competing in network infrastructure management. Arista Campus LAN Switches have the upper hand due to their comprehensive feature set and advanced programmability.

Features: HPE ProCurve offers scalability, energy-efficient design, and a user-friendly interface. Arista Campus LAN Switches include advanced programmability, support for extensive APIs, and automation capabilities.

Room for Improvement: HPE ProCurve could enhance its feature set and provide more advanced programmability options. It could also offer more customization capabilities and improve integration with third-party systems. Arista Campus LAN Switches could improve cost-effectiveness, simplify the setup process, and boost energy efficiency for more sustainable operations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HPE ProCurve is noted for straightforward deployment and reliable support, making it ideal for organizations with limited IT resources. Arista offers a flexible deployment model and superior customer service, ideal for tech-savvy organizations.

Pricing and ROI: HPE ProCurve provides competitive pricing with a lower initial setup cost, ensuring good ROI for budget-conscious buyers. Arista Campus LAN Switches require a higher upfront cost but provide significant long-term ROI through reduced operational expenses and enhanced performance.

To learn more, read our detailed Arista Campus LAN Switches vs. HPE ProCurve Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Arista Campus LAN Switches vs. HPE ProCurve

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 911,839 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Arista Campus LAN Switches

Ranking in LAN Switching

7th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

HPE ProCurve

Ranking in LAN Switching

3rd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the LAN Switching category, the mindshare of Arista Campus LAN Switches is 5.6%, up from 3.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of HPE ProCurve is 10.2%, down from 12.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

LAN Switching Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
HPE ProCurve	10.2%
Arista Campus LAN Switches	5.6%
Other	84.2%

LAN Switching

Featured Reviews

Denis Malinovtsev

Chief Technology Officer at ictbit

Unified monitoring has transformed campus deployments and provides rapid EVPN-VXLAN rollouts

Regarding improvements to Arista Campus LAN Switches, nothing comes to mind about the switches themselves; they are really fast and have all the technologies and protocols that exist in the market. However, on the management system, I would improve it because as a network engineer, I want a chatbot that can communicate in a native language with the monitoring system to get answers regarding my network faults. There are no problems particularly with the product, but there is room for improvement regarding licensing and the chatbot for all Arista products.

Read full review

Bronson Tillie

Ict And Managed Services Consultant at Wyntec

Experience seamless integration and responsive tech support for smooth operations

Amazon RDS is easy to use. It is somewhat pricier but manageable. It has easy tasks and integrates smoothly with frontend components. When using IDE services such as PgAdmin, the installation steps are straightforward. The availability is also high, which is why we use it. It offers easy scalability and migration between different configurations. RDS performs well overall. The main consideration is pricing, which is higher compared to alternatives such as DigitalOcean. For backup and restore operations, it takes slightly longer - approximately 2-3 minutes compared to 2 minutes with other providers. There are also more steps to follow compared to other service providers. The installation process is straightforward with no complex requirements. Users can directly select their desired database, memory requirements, and port numbers without complications.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The template functionality saves a lot of time and man-hours, which results in cost and time savings."

"The CloudVision Portal allows us to centrally manage all of our Arista products."

"The Software Defined switch architecture, runs optimized 2-tier network instead of traditional 3-tier network (Core, Distribution and Access) gives you efficiency and savings."

"Clients are very satisfied with the implementation process."

"The solution's most valuable feature is its stability because Arista falls in an industry that is very similar to Cisco."

"The technology is scalable as much as you want."

"The management portal has improved the way our organization functions."

"QoS is the most valuable feature because our clients work with VOIP and Critical applications."

More Arista Campus LAN Switches pros

"The most valuable feature is that you have a very flexible product, as you can mix the ports and set up based on your network needs, and it can even compensate for fractions of fans or power supplies, which can easily be exchanged, for example."

"Backup and CLI - being able to backup the device configurations within our enterprise software, our customers can track any changes made as we keep a history of all configuration changes."

"It is easy to deploy."

"In terms of valuable features, I like its ability to configure, as HPE's ProCurve switches are easy to configure and to know how to create each connection and configuration."

"It's easy to manage and configure. The configurations can be exported and imported to another solution."

"One of the biggest things in HPE ProCurve that I like, though not necessarily a feature, is the HPE warranty because it's probably better than any of the other vendors that we deal with, as it has a lifetime replacement. Feature-wise, the web interface of HPE ProCurve is typically pretty good and I like that as well."

"HPE ProCurve has plenty of features."

"This is a very reliable solution."

More HPE ProCurve pros

Cons

"One of the issues that we have been faced with here in Brazil is that we don't have any list times for delivery."

"I think there's still room for improvement. Arista Campus LAN Switches are not highly scalable as they are hardware-based. If hardware requirements exceed capacity, the product needs to be changed, which can impact service."

"It would be ideal if the solution was less expensive."

"I do think they could improve their licensing model. Today, I need to pay for a license, for a switch, for support, and it costs money; it is not cheap."

"I would like to see a version available with eight or sixteen ports."

"The licensing cost is pretty heavy. That is something that they need to definitely work upon."

"We have to renew the license every three years, which can be a challenge for customers. Arista, like other vendors, now follows a license-based system."

"The complex setup phase is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"The user interface (UI) could be better."

"The product must provide something similar to Cisco’s command-line interface."

"The only things that might need improvement would be the administrative tools and the graphical interface. The GUI could be improved on the administrative interface, for example."

"The pricing model could be improved in HPE ProCurve."

"There is one proprietary function they lack, and I can't remember what it was called, but it monitors the ports, and then every 10 seconds if the port is down, it can divert the traffic somewhere else."

"The solution doesn't have web-based management, which is why we've moved to a different solution."

"One of the weakest points of this solution is its on-premise. We are not able to do all we need to with the CLI."

"The solution's pricing could be made cheaper."

More HPE ProCurve cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price is not that good, but our clients value the solution despite the price."

"The only licensing costs are for CloudVision, although the upfront price of the device is not cheap."

"I would rate the pricing a six out of ten, with one being very cheap and ten being very expensive."

"The price could be more competitive."

"The product has a good price compared to other solutions."

"The product is reasonably priced."

"You buy the switch and that's it."

"It provides quite good value for money."

"There is a license required to use HPE ProCurve."

"This is an expensive switch."

More HPE ProCurve pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which LAN Switching solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

911,839 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Construction Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Educational Organization

Construction Company

17%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	1

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	19
Midsize Enterprise	10
Large Enterprise	11

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Arista Campus LAN Switches?

Regarding pricing, it is not cheap. While it is an enterprise solution, comparing it to low-level switches like Fortinet and Netgear, it is much more expensive. However, comparing it to Cisco and J...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Arista Campus LAN Switches?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Arista Campus LAN Switches?

I work as a consultant and integrator, using Arista Networks platform in my customers' networks. I deal with switches by Arista, which is mostly what we use Arista for. I am familiar with Arista Ca...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HPE ProCurve?

We know DigitalOcean is more economical compared to AWS through conversations with DevOps teams. In AWS, as RDS tables and memory usage increase, the prices increase accordingly. For market-related...

See all answers

What needs improvement with HPE ProCurve?

Sometimes the machines get stuck or disconnected, requiring a restart. When connection issues occur, we need to contact the DigitalOcean service team to restart or reboot the system. There are issu...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for HPE ProCurve?

I have used S3 bucket to save files. I used the SQL database from AWS. We use AWS Relational Database Services (RDS) and EC2, which is Elastic Cloud Compute. These are the three services I have use...

See all answers

Comparisons

Cisco Catalyst Switches vs Arista Campus LAN Switches

Compared 22% of the time

Cisco Nexus vs Arista Campus LAN Switches

Compared 21% of the time

Cisco FabricPath vs Arista Campus LAN Switches

Compared 18% of the time

Dell PowerSwitch N-Series vs Arista Campus LAN Switches

Compared 10% of the time

NETGEAR Switches vs Arista Campus LAN Switches

Compared 6% of the time

More Arista Campus LAN Switches Competitors

Cisco Catalyst Switches vs HPE ProCurve

Compared 18% of the time

NETGEAR Switches vs HPE ProCurve

Compared 14% of the time

Aruba Instant On Switches vs HPE ProCurve

Compared 13% of the time

Enterasys Campus LAN Switches vs HPE ProCurve

Compared 12% of the time

ExtremeSwitching vs HPE ProCurve

Compared 3% of the time

More HPE ProCurve Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

LAN Switching

August 2026

Download Arista Campus LAN Switches product report

Buyer's Guide

HPE ProCurve

August 2026

Download HPE ProCurve product report

Also Known As

No data available

ProCurve, HP ProCurve

Overview

Arista Campus LAN Switches offer efficient network integration and management, enhancing LAN deployment with superior telemetry and streamlined designs, delivering scalability and cost-efficiency.

Designed for effective deployment in network environments, Arista Campus LAN Switches utilize a Software Defined architecture that enhances network efficiency and provides savings with scalability. Responsible for fast EVPN-VXLAN deployment, these switches ensure superior telemetry capabilities while integrating seamlessly into networks through Arista EOS and open APIs. Their Quality of Service supports VOIP and critical applications. With CloudVision management and template functionality, deployment is simplified, reducing the need for excess hardware. Despite these advantages, enhancements in native language chatbot management, port options, and license renewal costs are desired by users. Scalability is affected by hardware constraints, and there is a call for faster delivery times and simplified setup.

What are the key features of Arista Campus LAN Switches?

CloudVision Management: Simplifies network operations through a centralized management platform.
EVPN-VXLAN Deployment: Facilitates rapid Layer 2 and 3 connectivity across the campus.
Superior Telemetry: Provides comprehensive network monitoring and insights.
Arista EOS & Open APIs: Ensures flexibility and interoperability within diverse networks.
Quality of Service: Optimizes performance for VOIP and critical applications.
Template Functionality: Reduces deployment costs through automated configurations.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Cost Efficiency: Reduces the number of switches required, saving operational costs.
Scalability: Enables effective network growth through software-defined capabilities.
Interoperability: Allows cohesive integration within existing network setups.
Productivity Boost: Simplifies maintenance and upgrades, leading to increased productivity.

Consultants and integrators utilize Arista Campus LAN Switches to enhance customer network environments, supporting both campus and data center needs. These switches are employed effectively by resellers for clients like community centers and are integral for system engineers managing Layer 2 and 3 connectivity. Deployment is streamlined using a controller-based template for efficient configuration across multiple sites.

Arista

HPE ProCurve offers a blend of cost-effectiveness, lifetime warranty, and user-friendly interfaces suitable for companies dealing with advanced networking demands.

HPE ProCurve provides reliable network solutions for businesses, healthcare, and educational organizations. Known for stability, scalability, and robust security features, it supports seamless VLAN configurations and efficient management. Its GUI and CLI ease the transition for users familiar with Cisco systems, enhancing network access control. Energy efficiency and competitive pricing further solidify its position as a dependable choice in network environments.

What are the key features of HPE ProCurve?

Cost-Effectiveness: Offers competitive pricing with substantial features.
Lifetime Warranty: Ensures long-term investment protection.
User-Friendly Interface: Simple GUI and CLI reminiscent of Cisco systems.
Scalability: Supports expansion needs with ease.
Security: Provides robust network protection measures.
Efficient Management: Streamlines backup and network configuration.
Energy Efficiency: Reduces operational costs with sustainable practices.
Multi-Vendor Integration: Facilitates compatibility with various systems.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Stability: Reliable performance for a variety of environments.
Scalability: Facilitates network expansion without major overhauls.
User Experience: Intuitive setup and management boost productivity.
Cost Savings: Affordable pricing delivers better ROI.
Energy Efficiency: Lowers utility expenses, promoting green practices.

HPE ProCurve is widely used across industries, connecting end-user devices like IP phones and printers as access switches, serving as the core network infrastructure. Companies rely on its capability to manage LAN and Wi-Fi connections efficiently, making it a preferred option for enhancing segmentation and control in networks of all sizes.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Sample Customers

University of Winchester, AWE, picturemaxx, Medical Mutual, Leonix, CloudEra, National Physical Laboratory, Tri-State G&T, AIS, Morph, SingTel, SDSC, BBC

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP, Cardinal Newman Catholic Secondary School, DY 4 Systems, EdgeWing, Edmonton Public Schools District, Halton Catholic District School Board, Hartwick College, Hatch Associates, Huntingdon College, Roseville Joint Union High School District, Saddleback Valley Unified School District, One Superior Place

Buyer's Guide

Arista Campus LAN Switches vs. HPE ProCurve

August 2026

Free Report: Arista Campus LAN Switches vs. HPE ProCurve

Find out what your peers are saying about Arista Campus LAN Switches vs. HPE ProCurve and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

911,839 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Arista Campus LAN Switches vs. HPE ProCurve report.

See our list of best LAN Switching vendors.

We monitor all LAN Switching reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.