We performed a comparison between Enterasys Campus LAN Switches and HPE ProCurve based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two LAN Switching solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The performance is good."
"Extreme Networks is the only one that has this kind of universal switch. It simplifies things greatly. Customers no longer have to worry about the price differences between traditional and fabric technology switches, which used to have their own pricing. This has made it easier for us as solution providers to tailor options for our customers with fewer but more suitable choices."
"Enterasys Campus LAN Switches is a trustable and powerful solution. The solution has good web management features. You can do whatever you want, like a CLI. The solution is easy to diagnose and manage. I like the Linux-based operating system. If any service crashes, you need to restart the system."
"The product's stability is good. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"Inter-VLAN is a great feature."
"The LAN features give us exactly what we need."
"HPE ProCurve's most valuable feature is that it is user-friendly."
"The user interface is the most valuable aspect of the solution for us."
"This is a very reliable solution."
"The user interface is simple to use."
"The most valuable feature of HPE ProCurve is its ease of use and implementation."
"Security features do exist, and they're mostly common with other switches. What makes these switches unique is the ability to see application layers on the switch, but not directly through the switch. There are tools from Extreme Networks that allow visibility of such traffic, which other switches lack. Extreme CloudIQ analytics can analyze all the traffic on Extreme Switches up to layer seven, offering full visibility. However, this tool is necessary for such detailed analytics and might not be compatible with some third-party products."
"While the support is good, it could be better, and the price could be reduced."
"The tool's price is high. We need a cost-effective service. It also needs to add wireless controller features like Huawei."
"One of the weakest points of this solution is its on-premise. We are not able to do all we need to with the CLI."
"Procurve would work better if it had more options like the web environment."
"HPE ProCurve is very complex for junior engineers and beginners. You need a lot of experience in managing switches in order to use this switch."
"The solution's pricing could be made cheaper."
"Our customers are focused on features and generally, they would like to have a more feature-rich solution."
"If you make a change and you disconnect yourself from the switch, you will create an issue."
"The solution doesn't have web-based management, which is why we've moved to a different solution."
"The pricing model could be improved in HPE ProCurve."
More Enterasys Campus LAN Switches Pricing and Cost Advice →
Enterasys Campus LAN Switches is ranked 11th in LAN Switching with 3 reviews while HPE ProCurve is ranked 2nd in LAN Switching with 36 reviews. Enterasys Campus LAN Switches is rated 8.6, while HPE ProCurve is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Enterasys Campus LAN Switches writes "A powerful solution with good web management features ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of HPE ProCurve writes "Offers reliability and helps with vulnerability assessment". Enterasys Campus LAN Switches is most compared with , whereas HPE ProCurve is most compared with Cisco Catalyst Switches, Aruba Instant On Switches, NETGEAR Switches, Dell PowerConnect Switches and Cisco Nexus. See our Enterasys Campus LAN Switches vs. HPE ProCurve report.
See our list of best LAN Switching vendors.
We monitor all LAN Switching reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
