Cisco FabricPath and Cisco Nexus compete in the enterprise networking category, with each offering unique strengths in scalability, integration, and network management. Cisco Nexus seems to have an upper hand due to its flexibility and high-performance features.
Features: Cisco FabricPath integrates well with existing infrastructures, emphasizing reliability and scalability, and simplifies multi-layer network management. Cisco Nexus is recognized for its modularity, providing flexibility, high-performance features, and seamless integration with Cisco's other networking solutions.
Room for Improvement: Cisco FabricPath could improve by enhancing documentation, reducing costs, and prioritizing better interoperability with other solutions. Cisco Nexus users desire improvements in documentation, pricing, and the addition of advanced automation features.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco FabricPath offers versatile deployment in both on-premises and hybrid cloud scenarios, receiving positive feedback for its technical support. Cisco Nexus primarily supports on-premises deployment and benefits from reliable customer service, despite some regional support inconsistencies.
Pricing and ROI: Cisco FabricPath delivers strong ROI with cost efficiency in operational management, seen as justifying its expense. Cisco Nexus, while costly, provides value through advanced features and performance but has complex licensing structures that could benefit from improved pricing strategies.
Speeding up our response times and reducing errors and incidents with automation and available APIs.
Based on my experience with technical support from Cisco, they are helpful and responsive; they respond based on severity.
Cisco provides excellent support.
For us, we have a time advantage because we know the solution, and the technological refresh is easier.
Cisco FabricPath is stable.
Initially, the stability of Cisco Nexus, particularly with the ACI, was problematic due to unstable codes, requiring replacements.
Additionally, parts availability in these regions needs improvement to address hardware failure situations, such as the availability of parts like a power cable.
In future updates, I would prefer to see features such as more AI functionality or better integration added to Cisco FabricPath.
When I talk about data centers, which are critical infrastructure and centralized application hubs, the Nexus platforms should be highly stable.
The solution is on-premises and stable.
Additionally, many products have subscriptions, making it very expensive when you bundle all together.
While pricing is slightly on the higher side, the overall assessment, which includes cost and technical capabilities, often favors Cisco.
The price of Cisco Nexus is on the higher side due to the premium services Cisco offers.
All solutions are very expensive and not an economy solution.
Cisco distinguishes itself with superior service post-procurement and robust features.
I have experienced operational efficiencies with Cisco FabricPath that are 200% better than the old legacy equipment and protocols.
It has helped streamline network-related operations with its automation and API capabilities.
For us, we have a time advantage because we know the solution, and the technological refresh is easier.
We monitor all LAN Switching reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
