Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Cisco CloudCenter [EOL] vs Racemi Cloud Path comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Cisco CloudCenter [EOL]
Average Rating
7.8
Number of Reviews
9
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Racemi Cloud Path
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Migration (22nd)
 

Featured Reviews

ZT
Director Of Technology at a non-profit with 11-50 employees
Useful features for configuring down to ports but extremely expensive
Our company uses the solution's GUI interface to configure and monitor ports. We look at usage and determine if there are any issues.  Cisco is a very qualified company and has been in business for many, many years.  The solution is useful because you can configure all the way down to ports.  You…
Use Racemi Cloud Path?
Leave a review
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Migration solutions are best for your needs.
881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Large Enterprise5
No data available
 

Also Known As

CliQr, CliQr CloudCenter
Cloud Path
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

NTT, Baylor College of Medicine (BCM), CollabNet, Pratt & Miller, PZFlex
Amazon Web Services, North American Public Sector Enterprise Services (NES)
Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, NetApp, IBM and others in Cloud Migration. Updated: January 2026.
881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.