Azure NetApp Files vs Cisco CloudCenter [EOL] comparison

Azure NetApp Files is designed for unstructured data, virtualized SAP systems, SQL backups, NFS and CIFS protocols, Azure Virtual Desktop storage, and optimizing file share services. It supports high performance and networking integration in Microsoft Azure.

Azure NetApp Files offers features such as SnapMirror for data protection, rapid provisioning, elastic scaling, and ultra-fast SQL backup and restore. It provides a seamless experience with fast snapshotting, high availability, security, and ease of setup. Users benefit from significant performance improvements and the ability to manage substantial workload migrations effortlessly. This service is ideal for environments like Azure Kubernetes Service and cloud EPM platforms, where speed, flexibility, and performance are crucial.

• Flexibility: Adaptable to diverse storage needs.
• Rapid response time: Ensures quick data access and operations.
• SnapMirror: Provides replication and data protection.
• SEC compliance: SnapLock ensures regulatory adherence.
• Ultra-fast SQL backup: Quicker backup and restore operations.
• Elastic scaling: Easily adjusts resources based on demand.
• Fast snapshotting: Enables quick data snapshots.
• High availability: Ensures consistent data access.
• Security: Robust measures for data protection.

• Performance: Notable improvement in processing speeds.
• Simplicity of setup: Easy deployment and configuration.
• Scalable management: Handles significant workload migrations with ease.
• Cost efficiency: Allows comparing throughput versus cost effectively.

Azure NetApp Files is implemented in various industries requiring robust file storage solutions, from educational environments where performance boosts are critical to businesses leveraging Azure Kubernetes Service for containerized applications. It supports high-demand environments, optimizing data management and improving efficiency.

Cisco CloudCenter [EOL] is utilized for tenant creation, VM management, hybrid deployment, cloud management, and port configuration.

Primary users include DevOps teams, telecom companies, and service providers. It integrates well with ACI and ASX-T, offering stability, initial setup ease, and extensive documentation. Known for high trust in Latin America, it excels in workflow automation through Action Orchestrator and supports detailed configuration down to ports. However, improvements are required in DevOps alignment, upgrades, automation, and cost management.

• Stability: Provides a robust platform with minimal downtime.
• Ease of Setup: Simplifies the initial setup process to get users started quickly.
• Documentation: Extensive guides and resources available for user support.
• Workflow Automation: Action Orchestrator enables cross-infrastructure automation.
• Blueprint Pattern: Defines middleware and dependencies effectively.
• API Integration: Offers agility and flexibility with API support.

• High Trust Level: Recognized reliability, especially in Latin America.
• Configuration Support: Capability to configure down to individual ports.
• Integration: Seamless integration with ACI and ASX-T.
• Agility: Enhanced flexibility and adaptability to changes.

Among its features, Cisco CloudCenter [EOL] serves industries like telecom and service providers needing hybrid deployment and cloud management. DevOps teams utilize it for tenant creation and VM management. Known for stability and initial setup ease, it supports Latin American regions highly. Action Orchestrator aids in workflow automation, benefitting user workflows. Improvements in DevOps alignment, UI, multi-tenancy, YAML abstraction, and cost management are desirable. It requires better security for XDR and comprehensive cloud offerings, including architecture and network security features.