Checkmarx One vs ReShaper comparison

Checkmarx and JetBrains are both solutions in the Static Code Analysis category. Checkmarx is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.1, while JetBrains is ranked #6. Checkmarx holds a 17.5% mindshare in SCAS, compared to JetBrains’s 2.5% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of Checkmarx users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of JetBrains users who would recommend it.

Checkmarx One

Read 71 Checkmarx One reviews

3,428 Views
24 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

ReShaper

Read 2 ReShaper reviews

607 Views
446 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Checkmarx One

ReShaper

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Checkmarx One and ReShaper are competing products in software development and security management. Checkmarx One has an advantage in comprehensive security features, while ReShaper offers enhanced code refactoring capabilities.

Features: Checkmarx One provides robust application security testing tools, including static and interactive testing, crucial for secure software development lifecycles. ReShaper focuses on powerful code analysis and refactoring tools to streamline the coding process. The main difference is Checkmarx One’s focus on security compared to ReShaper's on code optimization.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Checkmarx One offers flexible deployment options like SaaS, on-premises, and hybrid models, along with extensive customer support. ReShaper is primarily a desktop application focusing on easy integration with development environments and straightforward installation processes.

Pricing and ROI: Checkmarx One offers a competitive pricing model with a focus on long-term ROI through enhanced security. ReShaper presents a different financial model with a lower initial cost, emphasizing gains through improved developer efficiency and faster coding cycles.

To learn more, read our detailed Checkmarx One vs. ReShaper Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One vs. ReShaper

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Checkmarx One

Ranking in Static Code Analysis

3rd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (3rd), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (3rd), Vulnerability Management (24th), API Security (5th), DevSecOps (4th), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (9th)

ReShaper

Ranking in Static Code Analysis

6th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Static Code Analysis category, the mindshare of Checkmarx One is 17.5%, down from 24.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ReShaper is 2.5%, down from 5.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Code Analysis

Featured Reviews

Syed Hasan

Specialist Leader at Deloitte

Partner experiences excellent technical support and seamless initial setup

In my opinion, if we are able to extract or show the report, and because everything is going towards agent tech and GenAI, it would be beneficial if it could get integrated with our code base and do the fix automatically. It could suggest how the code base is written and automatically populate the source code with three different solution options to choose from. This would be really helpful.

Read full review

reviewer1465254

Software Engineer at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Detects, analyzes, and fixes any coding issues

When it's integrated with a weak server machine, the performance isn't that great. It starts up slowly and even crashes at times. If they optimized some of the modules within the ReSharper extension, it would be smoother and faster. Sometimes when the machine is a bit overloaded, it causes it to crash and you need to disable the extension and then re-enabled it. It's not really a stability issue, it probably depends on the machine, but they should consider the fact that not all people have strong machines with high hardware specifications. As long as you have a good processor it will work smoothly, but regarding minimum requirements, it needs to be revisited.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the application tracking reporting."

"The most valuable feature is the simple user interface."

"What I like best about Checkmarx is that it has fewer false positives than other products, giving you better results."

"The UI is very intuitive and simple to use."

"The most valuable features of Checkmarx are its integration with multiple SCM solutions and CICD tools, its ability to scale according to user licenses, and the quick scanning process."

"The value you can get out of the speedy production may be worth the price tag."

"The most valuable feature for me is the Jenkins Plugin."

"The identification of verification-related security vulnerabilities is really important and one of the key things. It also identifies vulnerabilities for any kind of third-party tool coming into the system or any third-party tools that you are using, which is very useful for avoiding random hacking."

More Checkmarx One pros

"The most valuable feature of ReShaper is that it provides continuously scanning of the data in real-time. ReShaper has a really good mechanism and process, they have a decent system."

"It comes with many features and supports almost all of the coding languages available."

Cons

"The validation process needs to be sped up."

"I would like to see the tool’s pricing improved."

"As the solution becomes more complex and feature rich, it takes more time to debug and resolve problems. Feature-wise, we have no complaints, but Checkmarx becomes harder to maintain as the product becomes more complex. When I talk to support, it takes them longer to fix the problem than it used to."

"The integration could improve by including, for example, DevSecOps."

"It would be really helpful if the level of confidence was included, with respect to identified issues."

"Integration into the SDLC (i.e. support for last version of SonarQube) could be added."

"It provides us with quite a handful of false positive issues. If Checkmarx could reduce this number, it would be a great tool to use."

"The solution sometimes reports a false auditable code or false positive."

More Checkmarx One cons

"When it's integrated with a weak server machine, the performance isn't that great. It starts up slowly and even crashes at times."

"ReShaper could improve by increasing the performance of the scans. Their application is taking too much CPU. The processing is taking too many CPU resources which causes the system to slow down."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of Checkmarx could be reduced to match their competitors, it is expensive."

"The pricing was not very good. This is just a framework which shouldn’t cost so much."

"The interface used to create custom rules comes at an additional cost."

"Most of my customers opted for a perpetual license. They prefer to pay the highest amount up front for the perpetual license and then pay for additional support annually."

"If you want more, you have to pay more. You have to pay for additional modules or functionalities."

"Before implementing the product I would evaluate if it is really necessary to scan so many different languages and frameworks. If not, I think there must be a cheaper solution for scanning Java-only applications (which are 90% of our applications)."

"I believe pricing is better compared to other commercial tools."

"It is not expensive, but sometimes, their pricing model or licensing model is not very clear. There are similar variables, such as projects or developers, and sometimes, it is a little bit confusing."

More Checkmarx One pricing and cost advice

"As far as I know, the licensing isn't very cheap."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Code Analysis solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

21%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Computer Software Company

21%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What alternatives are there for Fortify WebInspect and Fortify SCA?

I would like to recommend Checkmarx. With Checkmarx, you are able to have an all in one solution for SAST and SCA as well. Veracode is only a cloud solution. Hope this helps.

See all answers

What do you like most about Checkmarx?

Compared to the solutions we used previously, Checkmarx has reduced our workload by almost 75%.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Checkmarx?

The pricing is relatively expensive due to the product's quality and performance, but it is worth it.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Checkmarx One

Compared 36% of the time

Veracode vs Checkmarx One

Compared 12% of the time

Checkmarx SAST vs Checkmarx One

Compared 6% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs Checkmarx One

Compared 6% of the time

OWASP Zap vs Checkmarx One

Compared 5% of the time

More Checkmarx One Competitors

Whole Tomato Visual Assist vs ReShaper

Compared 100% of the time

More ReShaper Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One

June 2025

Download Checkmarx One product report

Buyer's Guide

Static Code Analysis

June 2025

Download ReShaper product report

Overview

Checkmarx One is an enterprise cloud-native application security platform focused on providing cross-tool, correlated results to help AppSec and developer teams prioritize where to focus time and resources.

Checkmarx One offers comprehensive application scanning across the SDLC:

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
API security
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
Container security
IaC security
Correlation, prioritization, and risk management
Codebashing secure code training
AI security
Tech partnerships extending AppSec into runtime analysis
Developer tool integrations including: CI/CD tools, development frameworks, feedback tools, IDEs, programming languages and SCMs

Checkmarx One provides everything you need to secure application development from the first line of code through deployment and runtime in the cloud. With an ever-evolving set of AppSec engines, correlation and prioritization features, and AI capabilities, Checkmarx One helps consolidate expanding lists of AppSec tools and make better sense of results. Its capabilities are designed to provide an improved developer experience to build trust with development teams and ensure the success of your AppSec program investment.

Checkmarx

ReSharper extends Visual Studio with over 2200 on-the-fly code inspections for C#, VB.NET, ASP.NET, JavaScript, TypeScript and other technologies. For most inspections, ReSharper provides quick-fixes (light bulbs) to improve the code.

JetBrains

Sample Customers

YIT, Salesforce, Coca-Cola, SAP, U.S. Army, Liveperson, Playtech Case Study: Liveperson Implements Innovative Secure SDLC

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One vs. ReShaper

June 2025

Free Report: Checkmarx One vs. ReShaper

Find out what your peers are saying about Checkmarx One vs. ReShaper and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Checkmarx One vs. ReShaper report.

See our list of best Static Code Analysis vendors.

We monitor all Static Code Analysis reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.