Checkmarx One vs JupiterOne comparison

Checkmarx and JupiterOne are both solutions in the Vulnerability Management category. Checkmarx is ranked #17 with an average rating of 8.2, while JupiterOne is ranked #49 with an average rating of 8.0. Checkmarx holds a 1.3% mindshare in VM, compared to JupiterOne’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Checkmarx users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of JupiterOne users who would recommend it.

Checkmarx One

Read 81 Checkmarx One reviews

18,784 Views
1,691 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

JupiterOne

Read 2 JupiterOne reviews

1,075 Views
376 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Checkmarx One

JupiterOne

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Checkmarx One and JupiterOne based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Vulnerability Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Checkmarx One vs. JupiterOne Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One vs. JupiterOne

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,311 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Checkmarx One

Ranking in Vulnerability Management

17th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (2nd), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (3rd), Container Security (16th), Static Code Analysis (2nd), API Security (3rd), Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (2nd), DevSecOps (3rd), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (8th), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (3rd), AI Security (2nd)

JupiterOne

Ranking in Vulnerability Management

49th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (22nd), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (30th), Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Vulnerability Management category, the mindshare of Checkmarx One is 1.3%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of JupiterOne is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Vulnerability Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Checkmarx One	1.3%
JupiterOne	0.3%
Other	98.4%

Vulnerability Management

Featured Reviews

Shahzad Shahzad

Senior Solution Architect | L3+ Systems & Cloud Engineer | SRE Specialist at Canada Cloud Solution

Enable secure development workflows while identifying opportunities for faster scans and improved AI guidance

Checkmarx One is a very strong platform, but there are several areas where it can improve to support modern DevSecOps workflows even better. For example, better real-time developer guidance is needed. The IDE plugin should offer richer AI-powered auto-fixes similar to SNYK Code or GitHub Copilot Security, as current guidance is good but not deeply contextual for large-scale enterprise codebases. This matters because it reduces developer friction and accelerates shift-left adoption. More transparency control over the correlation engines is another need. The correlation engine is powerful but not fully transparent. Users want to understand why vulnerabilities were correlated or de-prioritized, which helps AppSec teams trust the prioritization logic. Faster SAST scan and more language coverage is needed since SAST scan can still be slow for very large mono-repos and there is limited deep support for new language frameworks like Rust and Go, along with advanced coverage for serverless-specific frameworks. This matters because large organizations want sub-minute scans in CI/CD as cloud-native ecosystems evolve fast. A strong API security module is another area for enhancement. API security scanning could be improved with active testing, API discovery, full Swagger, OpenAPI, drift detection, and schema-based fuzzing. This is important as API attacks are one of the biggest AppSec risks in 2025. Checkmarx One is strong, but I see a few areas for improvement including faster SAST scanning for large mono-repos, deeper language framework support, more transparent correlation logic, and stronger API security that includes discovery and runtime context. The IDE plugin could offer more AI-assisted fixes, and the SBOM lifecycle tracking can evolve further. Enhancing integration with SIEM and SOAR would also make enterprise adoption smoother, and these improvements would help developers and AppSec teams move faster with more accuracy.

Read full review

Chijioke Okoye

Security Analyst at a outsourcing company with 501-1,000 employees

Unified asset visibility has improved investigations and now simplifies tracking security assets

There are some features that I have shared with our customer service manager. One of them that is relevant to us at this time is the need for better determination of unified devices. Currently, JupiterOne uses hostname weights, MAC addresses, or IP addresses to tie devices together, but we have actually requested a way for us to make those determinations ourselves. For example, when externally scanning a device using Qualys, internally it gives an IP address or FQDN, while externally it might be different. We want to be able to decide ourselves that these two devices are the same device even when they have different names and IP addresses for external and internal use. The unified devices feature is valuable and did not used to exist, and it has been fantastic. However, I believe more can be done regarding unified devices, and giving users the privilege to tie them together would be a good addition to the platform. One of the other things that interest us in JupiterOne and why we really wanted to use the tool is the compliance feature. We wanted to use it to track our compliance since we are ISO 27001 certified. However, the compliance module has not worked well, and we have had to continue tracking our compliance manually with the tools we use. Although there are some works in progress to improve the compliance part of the tool, I think if they can get it up to speed, that would be a really good improvement.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The user interface is modern and nice to use."

"Less false positive errors as compared to any other solution."

"Checkmarx is a powerful scanning tool, and it’s essential to have one of these products to build a safe and stable application when it comes to inviting customers to use your online services."

"The feature that I have found most valuable is that its number of false positives is less than the other security application platforms, its ease of use is another good feature, and it also supports most of the languages."

"It is a stable product."

"The most valuable feature of Checkmarx is the user interface, it is very easy to use. We do not need to configure anything, we only have to scan to see the results."

"Our static operation security has been able to identify more security issues since implementing this solution."

"The main advantage of this solution is its centralized reporting functionality, which lets us track issues, then see and report on the priorities via a web portal."

More Checkmarx One pros

"The product’s UI is pretty decent and fast."

"JupiterOne helps us aggregate all those things on one single platform, allowing us to quickly identify what environment that asset lives in and what type of asset it is."

Cons

"It could be improved with more reporting of false positives and the understanding of file references."

"When we first ran it on a big project, there wasn't enough memory on the computer. It originally ran with eight gigabytes, and now it runs with 32. The software stopped at some point, and while I don't think it said it ran out of memory, it just said "stopped" and something else. We had to go to the logs and send them to the integrator, and eventually, they found a memory issue in the logs and recommended increasing the memory. We doubled it once, and it didn't seem enough. We doubled it again, and it helped."

"Checkmarx could improve the REST APIs by including automation."

"Checkmarx could improve the speed of the scans."

"There are some downtimes when Checkmarx One is being upgraded to the latest version or some improvement is there."

"The pricing can get a bit expensive, depending on the company's size."

"We can run only one project at a time."

"Checkmarx needs to improve the false positives and provide more accuracy in identifying vulnerabilities. It misses important vulnerabilities."

More Checkmarx One cons

"However, the compliance module has not worked well, and we have had to continue tracking our compliance manually with the tools we use."

"You can only write Python queries in Jupiter, not other languages, like, SQL or PySpark."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Checkmarx is not a cheap scanning tool, but none of the security tools are cheap. Checkmarx is a powerful scanning tool, and it’s essential to have one of these products."

"We're using a commercial version of Checkmarx, and we paid for the solution for one year. The price is high and could be reduced."

"The tool's pricing is fine."

"We have purchased an annual license to use this solution. The price is reasonable."

"Be cautious of the one-year subscription date. Once it expires, your price will go up."

"The solution is costly."

"The interface used to create custom rules comes at an additional cost."

"Its price is fair. It is in or around the right spot. Ultimately, if the price is wrong, customers won't commit, but they do tend to commit. It is neither too cheap nor too expensive."

More Checkmarx One pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Government

Construction Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Outsourcing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	32
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	46

No data available

Questions from the Community

What alternatives are there for Fortify WebInspect and Fortify SCA?

I would like to recommend Checkmarx. With Checkmarx, you are able to have an all in one solution for SAST and SCA as well. Veracode is only a cloud solution. Hope this helps.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Checkmarx?

Checkmarx One is a premium solution, so budget accordingly. Make sure you understand how licensing scales with additional applications and users. I advise negotiating multi-year contracts or bundle...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Checkmarx?

One way Checkmarx One could be improved is if it could automatically run scans every month after implementation. If it is possible to set it in the SAST portal to scan the repositories automaticall...

See all answers

What needs improvement with JupiterOne?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for JupiterOne?

Our main use case for JupiterOne is as an asset catalog tool where we document all our assets that are integrated from different platforms such as Device42, Qualys, Microsoft M365, and Defender. We...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering JupiterOne?

JupiterOne has many features. Although none comes to mind almost immediately, I know it often depends on how we are able to write or craft the queries. JupiterOne has been very instrumental to me i...

See all answers

Comparisons

SonarQube vs Checkmarx One

Compared 43% of the time

Veracode vs Checkmarx One

Compared 4% of the time

Checkmarx SAST vs Checkmarx One

Compared 3% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs Checkmarx One

Compared 3% of the time

Fortify Software Security Center vs Checkmarx One

Compared 2% of the time

More Checkmarx One Competitors

Axonius vs JupiterOne

Compared 46% of the time

Wiz vs JupiterOne

Compared 21% of the time

AWS Security Hub vs JupiterOne

Compared 8% of the time

Surface Command vs JupiterOne

Compared 7% of the time

runZero vs JupiterOne

Compared 6% of the time

More JupiterOne Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One

March 2026

Download Checkmarx One product report

Buyer's Guide

Vulnerability Management

February 2026

Download JupiterOne product report

Overview

Checkmarx One is an enterprise cloud-native application security platform focused on providing cross-tool, correlated results to help AppSec and developer teams prioritize where to focus time and resources.

Checkmarx One offers comprehensive application scanning across the SDLC:

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
API security
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
Container security
IaC security
Correlation, prioritization, and risk management
Codebashing secure code training
AI security
Tech partnerships extending AppSec into runtime analysis
Developer tool integrations including: CI/CD tools, development frameworks, feedback tools, IDEs, programming languages and SCMs

Checkmarx One provides everything you need to secure application development from the first line of code through deployment and runtime in the cloud. With an ever-evolving set of AppSec engines, correlation and prioritization features, and AI capabilities, Checkmarx One helps consolidate expanding lists of AppSec tools and make better sense of results. Its capabilities are designed to provide an improved developer experience to build trust with development teams and ensure the success of your AppSec program investment.

Checkmarx

JupiterOne offers a comprehensive platform designed for cybersecurity asset management, providing streamlined solutions for security and compliance. Experts appreciate its capability to increase visibility across cloud environments.

JupiterOne simplifies asset management by integrating with multiple tools and frameworks, enabling organizations to gain insights into their security posture. It supports continuous monitoring and instant analysis, enhancing risk management and compliance reporting. By centralizing information, it reduces manual efforts, allowing teams to focus on strategic initiatives.

What are JupiterOne's key features?

Automated Asset Discovery: Continually identifies and catalogs assets across cloud environments.
Graph-Based Visualization: Offers an intuitive view of asset relationships and influences within the infrastructure.
Policy Management: Simplifies the creation and enforcement of security policies with pre-built templates.
Compliance Mapping: Maps data to compliance frameworks for streamlined reporting and audits.
Alerting and Notification: Provides customizable alerts to maintain proactive security measures.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Improved Security Posture: Enhances visibility and control over cloud assets, reducing risks.
Efficient Risk Management: Supports better decision-making with real-time data analysis.
Cost Savings: Reduces the need for multiple point solutions by centralizing functions.
Time Efficiency: Minimizes manual tasks, allowing teams to focus on core security functions.
Scalability: Easily adapts to growing infrastructure needs, maintaining performance and efficiency.

In healthcare, JupiterOne helps manage sensitive data compliance and security, while financial services benefit from its robust compliance reporting features. Technology companies use its automation capabilities to enhance cloud asset management, providing a scalable backbone for growth and security alignment.

JupiterOne

Sample Customers

YIT, Salesforce, Coca-Cola, SAP, U.S. Army, Liveperson, Playtech Case Study: Liveperson Implements Innovative Secure SDLC

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One vs. JupiterOne

March 2026

Free Report: Checkmarx One vs. JupiterOne

Find out what your peers are saying about Checkmarx One vs. JupiterOne and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Checkmarx One vs. JupiterOne report.

See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors.

We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.