Checkmarx One vs HCL AppScan vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing comparison

Checkmarx One is an enterprise cloud-native application security platform focused on providing cross-tool, correlated results to help AppSec and developer teams prioritize where to focus time and resources.

Checkmarx One offers comprehensive application scanning across the SDLC:

• Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
• Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
• API security
• Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
• Container security
• IaC security
• Correlation, prioritization, and risk management
• Codebashing secure code training
• AI security
• Tech partnerships extending AppSec into runtime analysis
• Developer tool integrations including: CI/CD tools, development frameworks, feedback tools, IDEs, programming languages and SCMs

Checkmarx One provides everything you need to secure application development from the first line of code through deployment and runtime in the cloud. With an ever-evolving set of AppSec engines, correlation and prioritization features, and AI capabilities, Checkmarx One helps consolidate expanding lists of AppSec tools and make better sense of results. Its capabilities are designed to provide an improved developer experience to build trust with development teams and ensure the success of your AppSec program investment.

IBM Security AppScan enhances web application security and mobile application security, improves application security program management and strengthens regulatory compliance. By scanning your web and mobile applications prior to deployment, AppScan enables you to identify security vulnerabilities and generate reports and fix recommendations.

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing offers robust scalability, ease of use, and high accuracy in scanning, making it a valuable tool for enterprises.

This security testing platform is known for its centralized dashboard, guided scans, and comprehensive reporting. It integrates seamlessly with tools like Fortify code scanner and supports extensive vulnerability detection and analysis, enhancing efficiency in security management. Despite its strengths, users suggest improvements in cloud integration, cost-effectiveness, and installation processes. Faster scans, reduced false positives, and improved mobile testing features are also desired.

• Scalability: Easily adapts to changing enterprise needs.
• Ease of Use: User-friendly interface with guided scans.
• Comprehensive Reporting: Detailed vulnerability analysis and reporting.
• Integration Capabilities: Works with Fortify code scanner and user authentication scanning.
• Wide Vulnerability Detection: Identifies extensive security vulnerabilities.

• Efficient Vulnerability Management: Streamlines security management in development environments.
• Detailed Analysis: Provides in-depth insights into security issues.
• Quick Setup: Easy to deploy within existing systems.
• Enterprise Preference: Supports enterprise environments efficiently.

In industries like BFSI, OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing is employed for performance network application testing, dynamic and static application security testing, and code checks. Security and QA teams use it in development processes to ensure application security prior to release, proving integral in both enterprise and testing environments.