

Find out in this report how the two Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
I have seen a strong ROI from using Check Point Security Management through unified policy management, reduced misconfigurations, and faster incident response.
The time to resolve issues is very much better now with Check Point Security Management.
I have seen a hundred percent return on investment with Check Point Security Management.
Having both cloud and on-premise solutions enables effective file sanitization and vulnerability detection while preventing attacks that save costs and protect reputation.
MetaDefender has positively impacted my organization by reducing the risk of file-based attacks, which has significantly improved our overall defense against phishing and malware delivery techniques.
I believe it is worth the money, as it brings time-saving, cost-saving, and efficiency improvements, especially in large environments.
When we face technical issues, they are ready to help us.
Customer support for Check Point Security Management is excellent
We have partner support that helps us mitigate vulnerabilities reported by our infrastructure team.
This can save time because many vendors, when they check something and ask for logs, need those logs from the beginning.
When it comes to my communication with agents, I find they are responsive and professional.
Their customer service team, distribution team, and regional sales managers provide excellent aftercare and set us up for upselling across the entire MetaDefender portfolio.
It can be a multi-domain Security Management server and can manage large or segmented environments with multiple domains or customers.
When you upgrade multiple times, you leave many files that are useless. They are dated, so it's always better to create a new machine every few versions, for example, three or four major versions.
The scalability of Check Point Security Management is excellent.
You need to do some sizing before installation and understand exactly what you are seeking from the solution and how it fits your organization.
When you use one database for all instances, you can deploy ten different servers or ten different instances with a separate database for each one.
We handle vast amounts of traffic from banking, defense, and critical national infrastructure.
Check Point Security Management is really stable, and I have not experienced any downtime or issues with reliability except for when we do upgrades.
The SmartConsole used to administrate the security management is somewhat unstable.
Check Point Security Management is very stable in my experience, ensuring that our operations run smoothly without interruptions.
The stability of the system is very high.
MetaDefender is 100% stable, making it one of the best cybersecurity solutions we offer.
I find it stable as it maintains good external stability with good availability and no major issues.
When the logs are too heavy for the security management server, the CPU spike will be high, causing our management day-to-day activity to lag or become difficult.
Refining reports and automation capabilities to make it more intuitive and scalable for diverse enterprise environments could improve Check Point Security Management.
Engaging role-based access control is essential; granular permissions for more flexible RBAC will allow the organization to delegate tasks.
I want to see enhancements allowing for automatic ticket creation using APIs to streamline the workflow and assign tickets to respective teams.
MetaDefender should have a wizard or general policies that can be used for 80 percent of customers.
Pricing is an important aspect in catering to customer budgets and is a must-have consideration for organizations.
Since we are using it extensively, we get significant discounts during procurement.
Licensing is quite expensive.
We pay on a three-year base.
When someone attempted to buy from us one instance of OPSWAT, it was about nine thousand dollars for multi-scanning with eight engines and also the CDR module.
The price varies based on deployment types; we only used it for file transfer and cloud integration rather than email, which kept it within our budget.
Regarding pricing, setup cost, and licensing, I find the pricing for kiosks, cloud, deep CDR, and adaptive sandbox appropriate.
Check Point Security Management has positively impacted my organization by providing centralized control, allowing us to manage all security policies and gateways from a single console, reducing complexity and saving time.
After deploying Check Point Security Management, we improved our productivity by integrating all devices into a single console instead of managing separate log-ins for each branch's gateways, making our admin team's tasks easier.
The monitoring is exceptional as it provides consolidated logs, signals, and any alerts that come from the security gateway in real time.
I believe this is very effective and is the most effective engine of OPSWAT because customers ask for OPSWAT for two main reasons: the CDR capabilities and the multi-scanning engines.
MetaDefender's core philosophy of trusting no file means it scans files, rebuilds them, and verifies their reputation, ensuring they contain no malicious content.
The integration of multi-scanning and Content Disarm and Reconstruction is truly helpful because we can utilize it in other products such as email integration with ICAP capability, and we are also using it in web scanning.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| MetaDefender | 1.8% |
| Check Point Security Management | 1.2% |
| Other | 97.0% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 55 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 31 |
| Large Enterprise | 43 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 9 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 11 |
Check Point Security Management offers centralized policy control, a unified console, and role-based access. It simplifies security operations through automation, real-time monitoring, and integration capabilities, ensuring efficient management across multiple environments.
Users leverage Check Point Security Management for streamlined configuration and consistent security enforcement. The platform's scalability and flexibility suit diverse environments, including cloud and on-premise settings, enabling efficient firewall and security gateway management. Real-time monitoring and logging capabilities facilitate swift incident response and comprehensive oversight.
What are the key features of Check Point Security Management?Check Point Security Management is widely implemented across industries such as finance, healthcare, and telecommunications. These sectors require stringent security protocols and benefit from real-time monitoring and comprehensive threat prevention capabilities it provides. Organizations use it to manage and enforce security measures, ensuring secure data transmission and infrastructure protection.
MetaDefender provides advanced multiscanning capabilities using 30+ anti-malware engines, ensuring high detection efficacy and robust prevention mechanisms.
MetaDefender's approach combines multiple security technologies like Metascan, Deep CDR, and adaptive sandboxing. These integrated solutions offer comprehensive protection against malware and vulnerabilities, catering to cloud, on-prem, and hybrid environments with enhanced performance and automation.
What are the key features of MetaDefender?
What benefits and ROI can MetaDefender offer?
MetaDefender is trusted in industries such as financial services, healthcare, manufacturing, and government, where rigorous policy control and auditability are vital. Its diverse deployment options allow for consistent security across datacenters, OT networks, and secure facilities, meeting stringent compliance needs.
We monitor all Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.