


Check Point Quantum Force NGFW and Palo Alto Networks K2-Series compete in the network security category, specifically within next-generation firewall solutions. Based on feature set and advanced threat prevention capabilities, Palo Alto K2-Series appears to have the upper hand with its strong security attributes.
Features: Check Point Quantum Force NGFW offers robust security features like IPsec VPN for fast and easy connections, application and content filtering, and centralized management with a user-friendly Smart Dashboard. Palo Alto Networks K2-Series distinguishes itself with advanced threat prevention features including SSL decryption, Zero Trust policies, and comprehensive traffic visibility, excelling in application control and threat prevention.
Room for Improvement: Check Point Quantum Force NGFW faces stability concerns related to frequent reboots and hardware compatibility issues, along with a need for improved customer support and more flexible licensing options. Palo Alto Networks K2-Series users identify high costs and complexity in management as points for potential enhancement, suggesting improvements in user interface ease and AI-driven feature integration.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Check Point Quantum Force NGFW primarily supports on-premises and hybrid cloud deployment with variable technical support experiences. On the other hand, Palo Alto Networks K2-Series offers diverse deployment options with generally favorable customer support reviews, although efficiency in resolving complex issues can be enhanced.
Pricing and ROI: Both solutions are considered expensive, with Check Point Quantum Force NGFW noted for its complex licensing and high security package costs, albeit providing substantial ROI due to strong security features. Palo Alto Networks K2-Series is recognized for its premium price reflective of its advanced capabilities, although some users struggle to justify these costs without substantial security needs. Both products provide positive ROI in security efficacy.
Clients are now comfortable and not wasting productive hours on IT support.
The automation part is giving us a cost benefit and speed; we can react faster.
It's a very useful tool to mitigate and protect your enterprise.
This is a time-saving measure because we don't need to deploy a cluster or a firewall each time; we just create a virtual system on the management server using the same appliance.
Incident response time has reduced significantly, and downtime due to network issues has been minimized, leading to an improved return on investment.
The fact that we've not had any breach toward the data center side is plenty enough.
For CN-Series, there is no competitor which works the same way as Palo Alto does.
The quick resolution of issues with Fortinet FortiGate is due to the support of the company and the fact that the equipment is easy to work with.
I would rate the technical support for Fortinet FortiGate a ten out of ten.
As a solution provider, when I encounter problems, I connect directly with Fortinet support, and they provide solutions within a very short time.
The support team we engaged was knowledgeable and well-versed with the application.
We have escalated issues to Check Point technical support multiple times and have received timely and very good responses.
Even challenging issues like those with VPNs have been resolved efficiently with their help.
I would rate tech support from Palo Alto Networks at around eight out of ten points because we had dedicated people assigned to us.
We get Gold support from them, and they are pretty good.
I would rate the technical support for the Palo Alto Networks K2-Series from Palo Alto as nine out of ten points.
They scale up really well from smaller models like the FortiGate 40 and 50 to bigger sites with the FortiGate 100 for more throughput - up to enterprise datacenters.
The variation comes in terms of the interfaces and throughputs, but from a security perspective, you get the same benefit, irrespective of whether you have an entry-level unit or an enterprise.
We determine sizing based on multiple factors: number of users, available links, traffic types, server count, services in use, and whether services will be published.
If specified correctly, even the smaller boxes offer high session and bandwidth rates, making the solution highly scalable, even up to telco-level requirements.
It is easy to scale up by adding capacity through clustering or upgrading the license, and it effectively handles spikes in remote user connections or increased east-west traffic without noticeable bottlenecks.
Scalability must be carefully planned for, considering future growth and user base increases.
Vertical scaling allows you to purchase more powerful devices with additional RAM, compute, and larger model form factors.
We're experiencing 99.999% availability consistently.
I would rate the stability of Fortinet FortiGate a ten out of ten.
Currently, we are experiencing a general outage of one of the main internet service providers of the Dominican Republic, and we have not been impacted in our operations because with SD-WAN, we have another internet service provider and we are working with the second WAN connection without any disruption.
While the solution is generally stable, there are complications, such as requiring SmartConsole for deployment and upgrades, which can be time-consuming.
I have worked with Check Point products for 15 years and haven't found any stability or performance issues.
The use of Check Point firewalls has helped improve our security posture without any downtime.
Palo Alto typically doesn't have many glitches.
When considering Sophos XG, which we also use, the logging and reporting functionality is notably more efficient.
These sessions should be around five to ten minutes long, allowing users and partners to quickly grasp the information without disrupting their daily tasks.
The solution should be able to implement machine learning and analytics of all the logs for threat detection and protection.
AI-driven features would be highly valuable—particularly those that enable bulk operations and efficient handling of large numbers of objects or object groups.
One thing that would help in improving Check Point Quantum Force (NGFW) is having more flexible dashboards that I can tailor without relying on templates.
Other products, like FortiGate, are perceived as more intuitive because they are easier to configure from the start.
Enhancing web traffic protection would be a great upgrade.
L1 engineers cannot work on the Palo Alto Networks K2-Series because it's too complex, which requires L2 and above level of engineers.
With AI, if there is a Precision AI bundle that you're planning on exploring, then that definitely needs a significant uplift because currently it doesn't work for all the known models.
Last year, I renewed the support for three years, which can sometimes be expensive but depends on the security benefits and how it helps us.
It offers cost savings as it is generally cheaper than the competition.
It is about 20% cheaper.
In comparison to Fortinet and other products, the pricing may be considered high.
licensing is very pricey
Compared to other solutions, the pricing of Check Point NGFW is high.
It's a little bit expensive.
The pricing for the Palo Alto Networks K2-Series solution is affordable.
These features help reduce our downtime, manage the ISPs, and deploy SLAs for all the website traffic.
The most valuable feature of FortiGate is FortiView which provides proactive monitoring.
We got a firewall and gave an SSL VPN to my client to connect to their servers, after which, such kind of activities involving ransomware attacks stopped.
The firewall's default behavior of blocking all traffic, including a cleanup rule that blocks everything from external to internal sources, is highly valuable for protecting our network.
The most valuable features in my experience include perimeter firewalling, cloud and mobile security, application control, URL filtering, DLP, threat prevention, intrusion protection, and safeguarding against malware, botnets, and zero-day attacks.
Since implementing it, we have noticed a lot less getting through that maybe other antivirus within firewalls had failed to catch.
Overall, the K2-Series helps in much more protection, and dashboard compliances are being met.
We had configured dynamic user groups and App-ID based policies, which makes it all Zero Trust.
Mainly, it is very easy to understand, and the logs are very good.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Fortinet FortiGate | 18.7% |
| Check Point Quantum Force (NGFW) | 2.8% |
| Palo Alto Networks K2-Series | 0.2% |
| Other | 78.3% |



| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 357 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 132 |
| Large Enterprise | 188 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 159 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 94 |
| Large Enterprise | 199 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 14 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 8 |
| Large Enterprise | 13 |
Fortinet FortiGate is a versatile network security tool offering features like VPN, firewall, web filtering, intrusion prevention, and scalability. It is known for its performance and integration with other Fortinet products, making it a preferred choice for robust cybersecurity.
Fortinet FortiGate stands out as a comprehensive cybersecurity solution with strong performance and ease of configuration. It delivers unified threat management, integrating features such as dynamic routing, SD-WAN support, and centralized management. Despite its strengths, improvements in the web interface's stability, pricing structures, and reporting capabilities are needed. Users seek better integration with third-party tools and automation advancements to enhance the experience further. These enhancements, alongside improvements in bandwidth management and the reduction of licensing costs, are points of interest for users looking to capitalize on FortiGate's extensive capabilities.
What are Fortinet FortiGate's key features?Fortinet FortiGate is widely implemented across industries as a primary firewall system for securing internet gateways and safeguarding data centers. It supports businesses in achieving SD-WAN integration and enhances cybersecurity by providing essential features like antivirus, web filtering, and application control. Enterprises utilize FortiGate for securing remote connections and ensuring compliance with security standards, making it adaptable for different network sizes and industries.
Check Point Quantum Force NGFW provides centralized management with scalable security for network perimeters. As a reliable firewall, it ensures advanced threat prevention and offers seamless integration, making it suitable for various network environments.
Offering comprehensive security, Check Point Quantum Force NGFW helps control ingress and egress traffic, secures data center firewalls, and integrates seamlessly with cloud and on-premises setups. Users appreciate its application control, deep packet inspection, and identity awareness features for enhanced protection against cyber threats. Despite pricing issues and interface complexity, its IPsec VPN and robust logging provide valuable insights into network activities.
What are the key features of Check Point Quantum Force NGFW?Check Point Quantum Force NGFW is deployed across industries for securing network boundaries, supporting critical data center operations, and enabling secure VPN connections. In finance, it helps meet stringent compliance standards, while in healthcare, it's crucial for protecting sensitive patient data through robust security protocols.
Designed to handle growing throughput needs due to increasing amounts of application-, user-, and device-generated data, the K2-Series offers amazing performance and threat prevention capabilities to stop advanced cyberattacks and secure mobile network infrastructure, subscribers, and services.
We monitor all Firewalls reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.