ChaosSearch vs Datadog comparison

ChaosSearch and Datadog are both solutions in the Log Management category. ChaosSearch is ranked #48 with an average rating of 6.0, while Datadog is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.7. ChaosSearch holds a 0.0% mindshare in Log Management, compared to Datadog’s 6.0% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of Datadog users are willing to recommend the solution.

ChaosSearch

Read 1 ChaosSearch review

116 Views
109 Comparison Views

0% willing to recommend

Datadog

Read 187 Datadog reviews

28,761 Views
11,792 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

ChaosSearch

Datadog

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 13, 2025

Datadog and ChaosSearch compete in data management and monitoring. Datadog holds the upper hand with its comprehensive integration options, whereas ChaosSearch is preferred for optimizing storage costs without losing analytic capabilities.

Features: Datadog offers comprehensive monitoring solutions, real-time analytics, and a wide range of integrations. ChaosSearch provides cost-effective log analytics, minimal storage management, and data query capabilities in cloud storage.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Datadog's multi-cloud deployment and extensive integrations accelerate deployment. ChaosSearch integrates with cloud storage for simpler setup. Datadog provides strong customer service with extensive resources, while ChaosSearch focuses on direct support.

Pricing and ROI: Datadog might have higher upfront costs but promises ROI due to advanced analytics. ChaosSearch is cost-effective, optimizing storage costs and showing high ROI by removing extra infrastructure needs.

To learn more, read our detailed Log Management Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Log Management

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 864,053 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ChaosSearch

Ranking in Log Management

48th

Average Rating

6.0

Reviews Sentiment

4.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Datadog

Ranking in Log Management

3rd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

187

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (1st), Network Monitoring Software (4th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (2nd), Container Monitoring (2nd), Cloud Monitoring Software (2nd), AIOps (1st), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of ChaosSearch is 0.0%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Datadog is 6.0%, down from 7.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Log Management

Featured Reviews

reviewer2593014

Senior Data Engineer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Cost-effective logging solution with room for search and interface improvement

Our primary use case is logging for everything within the company. We have a custom LogShipper, and for whatever deployments we have, we add the LogShipper into our containers, apply customer configurations to parse log files, and send desired fields to ChaosSearch. We then review logs on…

Read full review

Kevin Palmer

DevOps/Security Principal at Raken

Useful log aggregation and management with helpful metrics aggregation

Datadog provides us value in three major ways: First, Datadog provides best-in-class functionality in many, if not all, of the products to which we subscribe (infrastructure, APM, log management, serverless, synthetics, real user monitoring, DB monitoring). In my experience with other tools that provide similar functionality, Datadog provides the largest feature set with the most flexibility and the best performance. Second, Datadog allows us to access all of those services in one place. Having to learn and manage only one tool for all of those purposes is a major benefit. Third, Datadog provides significant connectivity between those services so that we can view, summarize, organize, translate and correlate our data with maximum effect. Not needing to manually integrate them to draw lines between those pieces of information is a huge time savings for us.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"ChaosSearch is considered a cheaper alternative to Elastic."

"The Datadog suite has allowed us to easily integrate log collection into all of our services and quickly detect unexpected changes in system data to declare security incidents."

"The tool's deployment is easy."

"Datadog's learning platform is second to none."

"It has enhanced the performance of my team."

"Its integration definitely stands out. It provides seamless monitoring of all our systems, services, apps, and whatever else we secure and monitor. Visualizations have become simpler with dashboards. We are getting visibility into systems, services, and apps stack through a single pane of glass, which is good. We are able to put logs in context."

"The feature I've found most valuable is the log search feature."

"The many dozens of integrations that the solution brings out of the box are excellent."

"Dashboards are the most valuable."

More Datadog pros

Cons

"The user interface could be more intuitive and requires improvement."

"During my time at Klarna, I didn't see any improvements from using ChaosSearch."

"In the past two years, there have been a couple of outages."

"The more tools that they can build that allow you to run AWX playbooks, or other similar fixes, would benefit clients greatly."

"One key improvement we would like to see in a future Datadog release is the inclusion of certain metrics that are currently unavailable. Specifically, the ability to monitor CPU and memory utilization of AWS-managed Airflow workers, schedulers, and web servers would be highly beneficial for our organization."

"It could use some additional features when working with metrics like Grafana or like New Relic has. Datadog does not use library technologies like Dynatrace does. Datadog has machine learning too, but it does not have this option in all layers of monitoring like infrastructure service process in applications."

"We've had some issues where we had Datadog automatically turned on in AWS regions that we weren't using, which incurred a small but steady cost that amounted to tens of thousands of dollars spent over a few weeks."

"We primarily use the log management functionality, and the only feedback I have there is better fuzzy text searching in logs (the kind that Kibana has)."

"The cost does add up quickly, so it can be some effort to justify the necessary outlay to those paying the bills."

"Datadog has a lot of documentation, but a lot of that documentation assumes you know how the service works, which can lead to confusion."

More Datadog cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"At my last company, we did see ROI, specifically around response time. We could get to mission critical things that were down and losing revenue on immediately. So, the product paid itself back."

"The price of Datadog is reasonable. Other solutions are more expensive, such as AppDynamics."

"If you do your homework, you'll find that if you're really concerned with cost, it's good."

"My advice is to really keep an eye on your overage costs, as they can spiral really fast."

"Licensing is based on the retention period of logs and metrics."

"Pricing seemed easy until the bill came in and some things were not accounted for."

"The pricing and licensing through AWS Marketplace has been good. It would be nice if it was cheaper, but their pricing is reasonable for what it is. Sometimes, for their newer features, they charge as if it's fully fleshed out, even though it is a newer feature and it may have less stuff than their other items."

"The tool is open-source."

More Datadog pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

864,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ChaosSearch?

Pricing was a significant factor in choosing ChaosSearch, especially as an alternative to more expensive solutions like Elastic.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ChaosSearch?

The user interface could be more intuitive and requires improvement. The search function often feels wonky, making it difficult to find specific messages. There should be documentation or feature e...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ChaosSearch?

See all answers

Any advice about APM solutions?

There are many factors and we know little about your requirements (size of org, technology stack, management systems, the scope of implementation). Our goal was to consolidate APM and infra monitor...

See all answers

Datadog vs ELK: which one is good in terms of performance, cost and efficiency?

With Datadog, we have near-live visibility across our entire platform. We have seen APM metrics impacted several times lately using the dashboards we have created with Datadog; they are very good c...

See all answers

Which would you choose - Datadog or Dynatrace?

Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether the Datadog or Dynatrace network monitoring software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Dynatrace. Dynatrace offers network ...

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

Dynatrace vs Datadog

Compared 12% of the time

Azure Monitor vs Datadog

Compared 10% of the time

AWS X-Ray vs Datadog

Compared 5% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Datadog

Compared 5% of the time

New Relic vs Datadog

Compared 4% of the time

More Datadog Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Log Management

July 2025

Download ChaosSearch product report

Buyer's Guide

Datadog

July 2025

Download Datadog product report

Overview

ChaosSearch boosts organizational data management and analysis, excelling in log analysis, cost-efficient data storage, and security analytics. Key features include managing vast data volumes, scalability, and a user-friendly interface, enhancing decision-making and efficiency across diverse industries without heavy infrastructure investments.

ChaosSearch

Datadog is a comprehensive cloud monitoring platform designed to track performance, availability, and log aggregation for cloud resources like AWS, ECS, and Kubernetes. It offers robust tools for creating dashboards, observing user behavior, alerting, telemetry, security monitoring, and synthetic testing.

Datadog supports full observability across cloud providers and environments, enabling troubleshooting, error detection, and performance analysis to maintain system reliability. It offers detailed visualization of servers, integrates seamlessly with cloud providers like AWS, and provides powerful out-of-the-box dashboards and log analytics. Despite its strengths, users often note the need for better integration with other solutions and improved application-level insights. Common challenges include a complex pricing model, setup difficulties, and navigation issues. Users frequently mention the need for clearer documentation, faster loading times, enhanced error traceability, and better log management.

What are the key features of Datadog?

Graphs and Dashboards: Visualizes servers and infrastructure with customizable views.
Metrics: Offers deep insights into system performance and user behavior.
Log Management: Provides powerful analytics for logs and seamless log aggregation.
Unified Tagging: Facilitates organization and retrieval of metrics and logs.
APM and RUM: Enables application performance monitoring and real user monitoring for comprehensive insights.
Synthetic Testing: Allows the simulation of user interactions to test application performance.

What benefits and ROI should users look for in reviews?

System Reliability: Helps ensure uptime and performance across cloud environments.
Proactive Issue Resolution: Assists in identifying and resolving issues before they impact users.
Operational Efficiency: Streamlines monitoring and log management tasks.
Flexible Integrations: Adapts to various cloud services and infrastructure setups.
Real-Time Alerts: Provides timely notifications to address problems swiftly.

Datadog is implemented across different industries, from tech companies monitoring cloud applications to finance sectors ensuring transactional systems' performance. E-commerce platforms use Datadog to track and visualize user behavior and system health, while healthcare organizations utilize it for maintaining secure, compliant environments. Every implementation assists teams in customizing monitoring solutions specific to their industry's requirements.

Datadog

Sample Customers

Transeo, HubSpot, Revinate

Adobe, Samsung, facebook, HP Cloud Services, Electronic Arts, salesforce, Stanford University, CiTRIX, Chef, zendesk, Hearst Magazines, Spotify, mercardo libre, Slashdot, Ziff Davis, PBS, MLS, The Motley Fool, Politico, Barneby's

Find out what your peers are saying about Wazuh, Splunk, Datadog and others in Log Management. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

864,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Log Management vendors.

We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.