Catalogic DPX vs Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection comparison

The compared Catalogic and Mimecast solutions aren't in the same category. Catalogic is ranked #73 in BRS , and holds a 0.5% mindshare in the category. Mimecast is ranked #17 in DLP , with an average rating of 7.0, and holds a 2.8% mindshare. Additionally, 98% of Mimecast users are willing to recommend the solution.

Catalogic DPX

Read 2 Catalogic DPX reviews

886 Views
833 Comparison Views

0% willing to recommend

Mimecast Insider Risk Manag...

Read 78 Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection reviews

3,877 Views
2,132 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Catalogic DPX

Mimecast Insider Risk Manag...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2024

Catalogic DPX and Code42 Incydr compete in the data protection and recovery software category. Code42 Incydr appears to have the upper hand due to its advanced features, despite its higher cost.

Features: Catalogic DPX offers robust backup and recovery capabilities, highly reliable services, and competitive pricing. Code42 Incydr provides comprehensive data protection, advanced threat detection features, and a feature-rich environment that enhances security measures.

Room for Improvement: Catalogic DPX could improve reporting functionalities, accelerate performance, and enhance system efficiency. Code42 Incydr would benefit from better integration options, providing more granular control over security policies, and streamlining the user interface to enhance usability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Catalogic DPX is known for its straightforward setup and highly responsive customer service, assisting significantly during deployment. Code42 Incydr, despite good customer support, has a more complex deployment process requiring additional resources.

Pricing and ROI: Catalogic DPX is cost-effective, offering lower setup costs and strong ROI. Code42 Incydr is more expensive but delivers higher ROI through its advanced security features, making it ideal for buyers prioritizing security.

To learn more, read our detailed Backup and Recovery Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Backup and Recovery

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,286 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Catalogic DPX

Average Rating

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Backup and Recovery (73rd)

Mimecast Insider Risk Manag...

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Loss Prevention (DLP) (17th)

Mindshare comparison

Catalogic DPX and Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Catalogic DPX is designed for Backup and Recovery and holds a mindshare of 0.5%, up 0.2% compared to last year.
Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection, on the other hand, focuses on Data Loss Prevention (DLP), holds 2.8% mindshare, up 1.7% since last year.

Backup and Recovery Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Catalogic DPX	0.5%
Veeam Data Platform	6.6%
Commvault Cloud	3.9%
Other	89.0%

Backup and Recovery

Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection	2.8%
Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention	8.0%
Varonis Platform	5.8%
Other	83.4%

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Featured Reviews

it_user292722

Data Center Global SAP Operations Manager at a wholesaler/distributor with 1,001-5,000 employees

We use it to backup some high output critical physical servers, knowing that in case of disaster we could still recover to our VM environment. The user interface needs improvement.

The user interface needs improvement, the selection boxes to select a backup job are very small not adequate for managing 400+ backup jobs, we only see 8 job names in the small scroll window. The scheduler features are lacking, we must edit backup specs to reach the option to change the schedule. The new reporting feature has greatly improved the product, prior to this it was very difficult to have a full view of our backup schedules when scheduling a new job. Since the move from Syncsort to Catalogic, the quality control of upgrades has diminished and backups that used to work could not be restored without contacting Catalogic for a fix. We still see a lot of value in the product, but hope that the next few updates will not cause more issues... We wanted a mission critical enterprise solution, and sincerely hope that the future upgrades will bring the product back on track.

Read full review

Chuck_Mackey

Director, Cybersecurity Consulting at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Provides comprehensive visibility and protection, helps in identifying the gaps in security, and comes with excellent onboarding support

In a couple of instances, we had a little bit of trouble in getting it distributed throughout the organization. We ultimately managed to do it, but they talk about it being a pretty simple process, and it became a little laborious. It would just turn away. The agents were not being distributed. It was just churning and churning and churning. When we were looking for specific categories of data, it was getting bogged down, but that was not even so much Code42, although some of it was their issue. It really has to do with the overall infrastructure and what the organization is prepared to do. If the infrastructure or the networking is a little hinky or you don't have a really finely tuned network infrastructure environment and your patches aren't up to date on your servers and your endpoints, it could get a little sticky. Other than that, it was okay. We really didn't have much problem beyond that. It took a couple of days to sort that out, but it was no big deal.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Catalogic has great features including the ability to P2V from snapvaults, and recently the addition of agent-less backups for Linux."

"Works in the background and users are able to perform restores."

"It has quite a bit of flexibility in configuring backup sets."

"The solution is very stable. Very rarely do we have any issues with it. We don't have to deal with bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. We find it to be reliable."

"The endpoint backup component (the primary feature) is second to none."

"I have enjoyed the seamless and automated nature of CrashPlan the best."

"Backup and recovery have been great, but I love having the ability to keep the hybrid type build which they offer."

"I would only say that I could not recommend this product enough."

"We were using piecemeal procedures that failed more than it saved data."

More Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection pros

Cons

"Since the move from Syncsort to Catalogic, the quality control of upgrades has diminished and backups that used to work could not be restored without contacting Catalogic for a fix."

"The GUI could use improvement, but generally it's fine."

"It is a little confusing for users when they are replacing a laptop - a couple have wiped out their backup by choosing "adopt" before they do a restore."

"From time to time, you will see issues with the software not connecting to the on-premise server, or the client crashes on a users machine."

"I think one we can improve is the compression."

"Multi user environments are not currently supported and has been an inconvenience on several occasions."

"Would like to see the ability to bulk clear alerts in the admin console in a future release."

"Not available for iPads yet."

"We would like to see a little more flexibility in the reporting from the admin console."

More Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The pricing is reasonable. It's my understanding that the cost is about $7 for unlimited storage in the cloud per server."

"They were the best solution and surprisingly enough, the cheapest."

"It was expensive. It was more expensive than Eureka, and it was more expensive than Barracuda Backup, but what we got was a full team. They didn't come in and nickel and dime us. They provided the assistance we needed. They didn't say that they need to charge us for something or it is going to take another statement of work. It was all bundled into it... We pay for the software maintenance. It is probably 18% or 20% of the license fee for rev releases."

"It used to be a good solution for SOHO in particular as it had unlimited storage for a reasonable price. However, their pricing model has changed and they are now primarily targeting enterprise users."

"It is 100% worth the cost to get and keep the support, especially when setting it up."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,286 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Construction Company

12%

Educational Organization

10%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Performing Arts

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	24
Midsize Enterprise	24
Large Enterprise	30

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your primary use case for Code42 Incydr?

Data Leakage Protection on large scale environments. This can be to protect against leakage on endpoints and servers that consist of highly classified or propriety information. It can be added on a...

See all answers

Comparisons

Veeam Data Platform vs Catalogic DPX

Compared 21% of the time

Microsoft DPM vs Catalogic DPX

Compared 10% of the time

Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery vs Catalogic DPX

Compared 9% of the time

IBM Spectrum Protect Plus vs Catalogic DPX

Compared 7% of the time

Bacula Enterprise vs Catalogic DPX

Compared 6% of the time

More Catalogic DPX Competitors

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection

Compared 10% of the time

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection

Compared 8% of the time

Dtex Systems vs Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection

Compared 7% of the time

Varonis Platform vs Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection

Compared 7% of the time

Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vs Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection

Compared 3% of the time

More Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Backup and Recovery

March 2026

Download Catalogic DPX product report

Buyer's Guide

Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection

March 2026

Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection report

Download Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection product report

Also Known As

BEX

Mimecast Incydr, Code42 Next-Gen DLP, Code42 Next-Gen Data Loss Protection, Code42 Forensic File Search, Code42 Backup + Restore

Overview

Catalogic DPX protects your data quickly and reliably for your virtual, physical and cloud-based environments. DPX integrates backup and recovery, tape backup, disaster recovery, and bare metal recovery as copy data services that reduce both backup and recovery times by 90% or more through instantly mountable recoveries. DPX simplifies data protection across your enterprise infrastructure and reduces operational costs. The largest hidden cost of data protection is operations: the day-to-day management and troubleshooting of the many different tools used to back up, restore and copy data. Spending too much time on backup and using multiple tools is definitely a problem regardless of the business size which results in wasted resources and personnel time that could be deployed to higher value activities. DPX lets you work smarter by combining an easy-to-use, intuitive management interface with robust backup and disaster recovery capabilities. Built-in integration with NetApp means backup operators don't need to be storage experts. DPX doesn't require months of training and storage administration experience to operate freeing up IT staff to work on other projects that drive new revenue.

Catalogic

Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection streamlines automated backups and simplifies navigation with intuitive interfaces, supporting cross-platform environments and central administration.

Offering seamless integration of security and management tools, Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection enhances data protection while ensuring ease of use. With real-time data management and centralized administration, businesses experience minimized maintenance effort. Despite needing improvements in reporting, account management, and mobile integration, its robust risk scoring and lightweight clients offer substantial benefits. Designed for corporate and HIPAA-related data, it aids recovery from device losses and strengthens data loss prevention, integrating well into egress strategies.

What are the key features of Mimecast?

Automated Backups: Ensures data is backed up seamlessly with minimal intervention.
Real-time Data Management: Provides up-to-date data access and processing.
Cross-platform Support: Maintains functionality across different systems and devices.
Intuitive Interfaces: Easy navigation improves user experience.
Centralized Administration: Allows for streamlined management of data and security measures.
Risk Scoring: Customizable settings for enhanced data protection.

Which benefits and ROI should users consider?

Ease of Use: Simplifies complex data protection tasks with intuitive processes.
Maintenance Efficiency: Reduces manual effort through automated features.
Resource Utilization: Optimizes device and cloud resources for better performance.
Robust Support: Ensures help is readily available to address issues.

Industries like healthcare and legal benefit from Mimecast's data recovery support for HIPAA-compliance and large-scale unstructured data management. The platform is adaptable for both on-premises and cloud-based deployments, essential for maintaining security in high-risk environments such as during legal investigations.

Mimecast

Sample Customers

Hendrick Medical, CommonFund, Red-8, Fairfax County Schools, Tectrade, Storage Assessments

Adobe, Okta, Samsung, Taylormade, Boston University, Lending Club, North Highland, Stanford University, Ping Identity, Qualcomm, Pandora.

Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Rubrik and others in Backup and Recovery. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,286 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.