Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

CAST AI vs Cloudability comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

CAST AI
Ranking in Cloud Cost Management
31st
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
9.2
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Cloudability
Ranking in Cloud Cost Management
3rd
Average Rating
7.4
Reviews Sentiment
5.8
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2025, in the Cloud Cost Management category, the mindshare of CAST AI is 1.8%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Cloudability is 8.7%, down from 12.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Cloud Cost Management Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Cloudability8.7%
CAST AI1.8%
Other89.5%
Cloud Cost Management
 

Featured Reviews

RA
Global Head - DevOps and AIOps Startegist at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
Automation has optimized Kubernetes costs and right-sizing cuts manual cluster work
CAST AI helps us with automated node provisioning, workload right-sizing, intelligent auto-scaling, and overall cost visibility of the containerized systems that we have on the cloud. The best features CAST AI offers are the Kubernetes auto-scaling mechanism, continuous analysis of the pod-level CPU and memory usage, and ensuring that workload right-sizing is being done and our nodes are not over-provisioned. Identifying inaccuracies in the resource request is what we find quite useful with CAST AI. It definitely saves time and money as well, along with peace of mind because CAST AI continuously analyzes the pod-level CPU and memory usages. This helps us to optimize the request and the limits adjustments on our usage pattern, and overall, right-sizing improves the packing and reduces the wasted compute that we have in the cloud. In terms of overall impact on the organization, CAST AI has definitely helped us optimize our Kubernetes resources and given us automation capabilities. It is definitely helping us reduce the manpower and overall compute which is wasted. We can definitely save these using CAST AI. We will be notified upfront and proactively about any wastages that are happening, or any cost leakages that are happening in our system.
reviewer2784351 - PeerSpot reviewer
Digital Marketing, Marketing Technology & Analytics Architect at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
Gained clear cost visibility and forecasting but still needs finer insights using resource tags
Cloudability offers excellent features including trends, graphs for cost utilization, and forecasting capabilities. The forecasting feature has helped me understand how the resources are utilized and how the cost is burned, and then I use it to make changes to keep the cost in control. Cloudability has positively impacted my organization as it helps us understand cost utilization, make corrections, and understand the forecasting of the cost. It has made reporting much easier.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"We observed a 20 to 30% reduction in Kubernetes infrastructure cost, node utilization is improved, and we could see a 60 to 70% reduction in our manual cluster optimization efforts that we used to put initially."
"The support from IBM is fantastic"
"We use the product to get a detailed level of transparency on the cloud strengths."
"Transparency and visibility are the key features."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its ability to create reports and dashboards."
"Cloudability has positively impacted my organization as it helps us understand cost utilization, make corrections, and understand the forecasting of the cost."
"Each user can have their own dashboard that they want to consume. Instead of having to share one dashboard for multiple users, you can create individual views for each user to view, and that view will contain only their own accounts, which allows for separation of data."
"The pricing isn't too expensive."
"All the tagging and mapping, which helps to create some virtual tags are useful features."
 

Cons

"The documentation of CAST AI can definitely be improved for first-time users."
"Cloudability needs to focus on more cloud providers."
"I would improve the integration, or the preparation of the integration, for a complex environment."
"I wish there was a feature to temporarily remove certain recommendations from the list for teams that couldn't implement them immediately. I believe Cloudability could improve its automation functionality and enhance cost allocation modeling."
"Right now, what we're doing is we are manually putting the data in it, which is something which we don't like about Cloudability."
"They can improve the custom range of the network."
"In general, I feel Cloudability wasn't able to support many resources."
"The dashboard needs to include more graphs per team to show what individual teams are spending in a given time period."
"We would like them to have a linear regression, so we can be predictive for budgets, allocations, and the year's follow ups. We also want to have a longer window of analytics with better certainty that our workload will fit the model, not just in a two week window."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"It justifies the cost and is worth it."
"We have seen ROI with the reserved instances, and having the ability to predict what reserved instances you can get. We can save tens of thousands of dollars, and hundreds of thousands of dollars in some cases."
"Cloudability is a bit expensive."
"My team is one of the most expensive teams, and we look at it quite a bit. We have probably easily saved around $400,000 USD a year."
"The price of the license or the usage is a percentage of the top consumption. So it varies from year to year."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Cost Management solutions are best for your needs.
879,310 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
23%
Computer Software Company
11%
Retailer
6%
Manufacturing Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business2
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise12
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Cloudability?
The most crucial feature in reducing my cloud costs has been the rightsizing recommendations, along with the dashboards that track reserved instance spending coverage and utilization. As for Clouda...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cloudability?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing was adequate, but it could be made better.
What needs improvement with Cloudability?
It would be beneficial if we could use resource tags to provide more fine-grained visibility.
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Adobe, Uber, Pega, imgur, Pixable, Blackboard, Keboola, Avalara
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Nutanix, Apptio and others in Cloud Cost Management. Updated: December 2025.
879,310 professionals have used our research since 2012.