Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Calabrio ONE vs DeepL Translator comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Calabrio ONE
Ranking in AI Customer Experience Personalization
10th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
32
Ranking in other categories
Workforce Engagement Management (4th), AI Scheduling & Coordination (9th)
DeepL Translator
Ranking in AI Customer Experience Personalization
20th
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Translation Management Software (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the AI Customer Experience Personalization category, the mindshare of Calabrio ONE is 1.9%, down from 2.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of DeepL Translator is 1.0%. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
AI Customer Experience Personalization Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Calabrio ONE1.9%
DeepL Translator1.0%
Other97.1%
AI Customer Experience Personalization
 

Featured Reviews

GS
Customer Service Analyst/Scheduler at Tucson Electric Power
The Copy Schedule Activities reduces time spent for changing activities. Agents are not able to cancel an approved request in the Time Off Request area.
I cannot speak about the difference for the QM software. My main use is of the WFM software. A few of the features were "nice to have" features, but version 9.3 had some "deficiencies". The main problem was not being able to run scenarios in a pseudo scheduling area, so the way Calabrio is now, agents can possibly see test scenarios. Another problem is the Time Off Request area. Agents are not able to cancel an approved request through this area. The sorting/filtering could be improved upon greatly. We are scheduled to upgrade to version 10.0, which will resolve many of the issues we do not like about the current version that we are using. Update: We are still on version 9.3 and looking forward to upgrading.
reviewer2293203 - PeerSpot reviewer
Content Owner - International Markets at a tech vendor with 201-500 employees
Provides high-quality translations, understanding nuances and context well and provides API to automate translations
We translate a lot of content into Spanish. DeepL is set up for other languages like English and maybe others with different country variations, like British English or American English. With Spanish, there's only a general Spanish. However, Spanish can be very different depending on the country. My impression of DeepL is that they try to have standard, plain Spanish. But I would like the option of choosing different Spanish because Spanish from Spain, especially, is quite different from Latin American Spanish. In future releases, I would like to see an option for saving previous translations. For example, other translators, like Google Translate, save your past searches, and that might be something useful.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The Copy Schedule Activities has been a favorite tool. It reduces time spent when I need to make changes which are identical to multiple agents' schedules."
"It makes our work faster and more efficient, freeing up time for more complex tasks. The basic translation is done by DeepL, allowing us to focus on other details. The main improvement is in speed and efficiency."
 

Cons

"Give agents the ability to cancel approved requests for time off. Vacation plans do actually change in the real world."
"Being able to "publish" or rerun the schedule for only one agent would be ideal."
"In future releases, I would like to see an option for saving previous translations. For example, other translators like Google Translate, save your past searches, and that might be something useful."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The solution offers a fair price. If you're a casual user, you might not want to pay for it, so it's good to have the free version. The free version is good enough for what a casual user would need. But definitely, the prices are fair for this tool."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AI Customer Experience Personalization solutions are best for your needs.
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Insurance Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Energy/Utilities Company
10%
Retailer
6%
University
10%
Educational Organization
9%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business2
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise29
No data available
 

Also Known As

Calabrio
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Polaris, Equifax, Fedex, Rabo, Paychex, Virteva, VITAS Healthcare Corp, Keurig Green Mountain, AT&T, Esurance, Subaru, Boeing, Tiffany & Co., Thomson Reuters.
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Calabrio ONE vs. DeepL Translator and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.