CA IDMS vs IBM InfoSphere Optim comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Broadcom Logo
188 views|151 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
IBM Logo
854 views|300 comparisons
66% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CA IDMS and IBM InfoSphere Optim based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Database Development and Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed CA IDMS vs. IBM InfoSphere Optim Report (Updated: May 2024).
770,394 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most useful feature is the governance feature, because it can show us and help us to manage user profiles very quickly and using it in assertive way.""It is a really stable platform. It has been around for many years. We trust it implicitly. ​""Technical support is very good. They are very knowledgeable, very quick to respond, and very nice people, too.​"

More CA IDMS Pros →

"I feel the solution to be a bit faster than the traditional methods, which makes it easy to customize.""We like that we can easily restore the database with just a few clicks. The database is linked as well."

More IBM InfoSphere Optim Pros →

Cons
"Right now, it's not easy to start using this solution. You have to take long course and train people. It's not an easy path.""​I would like to see it made simpler to operate and maintain."

More CA IDMS Cons →

"We're looking for a solution that can be implemented on AWS. IBM InfoSphere Optim can be implemented on AWS, but it costs more than double what we're currently paying. So, it's not really of good value for us.""While the solution is very supportive of Db2, it is not so friendly when it comes to IMS databases."

More IBM InfoSphere Optim Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Do not hold back on asking questions about the maintenance and continued support of the product."
  • More CA IDMS Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "IBM InfoSphere Optim is a very expensive solution. Actually, it's the most expensive archiving solution that we have."
  • More IBM InfoSphere Optim Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Database Development and Management solutions are best for your needs.
    770,394 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:We like that we can easily restore the database with just a few clicks. The database is linked as well.
    Top Answer:IBM InfoSphere Optim is a very expensive solution. Actually, it's the most expensive archiving solution that we have. The cost is per license and per gigabytes.
    Top Answer:The cost needs to be reduced. It is a very expensive solution. We're looking for a solution that can be implemented on AWS. IBM InfoSphere Optim can be implemented on AWS, but it costs more than… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    188
    Comparisons
    151
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    854
    Comparisons
    300
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    489
    Rating
    6.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    IDMS
    IBM Optim, Optim
    Learn More
    Overview
    CA IDMS is a reliable, high-performance, web-enabled Database Management system (DBMS) for IBM z Systems that provides business value for hundreds of enterprises and government organizations. CA IDMS provides high-performance database management and transaction processing performance for existing and new workloads, helping you consolidate business functions on a central data repository, as needed.
    IBM Optim solutions manage data from requirements to retirement. They boost performance, empower collaboration, and improve governance across applications, databases and platforms. By managing data properly over its lifetime, organisations are better equipped to support business goals with less risk.
    Sample Customers
    Blue Hill Data Services Inc.
    Durham Police Department, Coca-Cola Enterprises Inc., Continental, KCE Electronics Public Company Limited, The University of Adelaide, Migros Zurich, COPROB
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm21%
    Government16%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm33%
    Insurance Company10%
    Computer Software Company7%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise2%
    Large Enterprise74%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise7%
    Large Enterprise77%
    Buyer's Guide
    CA IDMS vs. IBM InfoSphere Optim
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about CA IDMS vs. IBM InfoSphere Optim and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    770,394 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    CA IDMS is ranked 31st in Database Development and Management while IBM InfoSphere Optim is ranked 17th in Database Development and Management with 3 reviews. CA IDMS is rated 9.0, while IBM InfoSphere Optim is rated 6.6. The top reviewer of CA IDMS writes "We get network database performance. It supports our back office". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM InfoSphere Optim writes "Can easily restore the database, but the cost needs to be reduced". CA IDMS is most compared with IBM IMS, CA Datacom and Adabas, whereas IBM InfoSphere Optim is most compared with Solix Enterprise Data Management, Informatica Data Archive, Informatica Persistent Data Masking and Oracle Enterprise Manager. See our CA IDMS vs. IBM InfoSphere Optim report.

    See our list of best Database Development and Management vendors.

    We monitor all Database Development and Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.