Bugcrowd vs CrowdStrike Falcon comparison

Bugcrowd and CrowdStrike are both solutions in the Attack Surface Management (ASM) category. Bugcrowd is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.4, while CrowdStrike is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.6. Bugcrowd holds a 4.7% mindshare in ASM, compared to CrowdStrike’s 7.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Bugcrowd users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of CrowdStrike users who would recommend it.

Bugcrowd

Read 5 Bugcrowd reviews

3,443 Views
1,102 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

CrowdStrike Falcon

Read 136 CrowdStrike Falcon reviews

49,388 Views
3,951 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Bugcrowd

CrowdStrike Falcon

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2025

Bugcrowd and CrowdStrike Falcon are two competing players in the cybersecurity industry. Bugcrowd has the upper hand in pricing due to its affordability, making it a smart choice for budget-conscious organizations, while CrowdStrike Falcon is favored for its superior features that justify its pricing.

Features: Bugcrowd offers effective vulnerability detection through crowdsourced testing, allowing users to customize security assessments and adapt them to specific needs. CrowdStrike Falcon stands out for its advanced threat protection capabilities, including real-time endpoint monitoring and AI-driven threat intelligence, making it an attractive option for enterprises seeking comprehensive security solutions.

Room for Improvement: Bugcrowd could enhance its platform by expanding its feature set beyond vulnerability discovery to include more comprehensive security tools. It may also improve the integration with existing security systems. CrowdStrike Falcon could work on reducing the complexity of its feature set for smaller companies, offering more flexible pricing models, and improving user interface to ensure easier navigation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Bugcrowd integrates smoothly into existing workflows, leveraging crowd engagement for efficient vulnerability reporting, supported by commendable customer assistance. CrowdStrike Falcon, with its seamless cloud-based deployment, requires minimal configuration and is backed by a robust support structure, making it widely preferred for ease of use.

Pricing and ROI: Bugcrowd provides competitive pricing, reducing initial investment barriers, thus offering solid ROI for organizations with limited budgets. CrowdStrike Falcon's pricing reflects its advanced capabilities, providing significant ROI for enterprises that prioritize enhanced security measures.

To learn more, read our detailed Bugcrowd vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Bugcrowd vs. CrowdStrike Falcon

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,443 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Bugcrowd

Ranking in Attack Surface Management (ASM)

13th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Managed Security Services Providers (MSSP) (3rd), Bug Bounty Platforms (1st), Penetration Testing Services (3rd)

CrowdStrike Falcon

Ranking in Attack Surface Management (ASM)

1st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

136

Ranking in other categories

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (6th), Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (1st), Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) (1st), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (1st), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (1st), Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR) (1st), AI-Powered Cybersecurity Platforms (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Attack Surface Management (ASM) category, the mindshare of Bugcrowd is 4.7%, up from 4.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of CrowdStrike Falcon is 7.8%, down from 22.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Attack Surface Management (ASM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
CrowdStrike Falcon	7.8%
Bugcrowd	4.7%
Other	87.5%

Attack Surface Management (ASM)

Featured Reviews

Ben Gurney

Senior Engineering Manager - Platform Team at eTender Inc

Crowdsourced triage has uncovered critical website vulnerabilities and continuously improves our security posture

Bugcrowd could be improved or enhanced as they seem to have a lot of internal churn at the moment, so they could be more stable and more customer-focused. By customer-focused, I mean they are not very good at communicating what is changing on their side to their customers. I am now on my fourth account manager within one year. My latest call with them was with the fourth account manager saying there have been many changes and apologizing that no one I have spoken to in the past is on this call, but going forwards it will be them. With the fourth account manager in a year, it is hard to trust that message.

Read full review

Waleed Omar

Information Security Specialist at Arab Open University

Provides effective real-time threat detection with potential for cost optimization

Some features such as device control, firewall management, and file analysis are standalone products that we need to purchase separately. If these features came out of the box within the product, it would be much more beneficial for us. Other providers such as SentinelOne include these features in their base product. We attended a CrowdStrike Falcon event where they discussed some shallow AI features, but we cannot see these in our panel yet. We work with different solutions such as Darktrace and SocRadar, where AI features are automatically displayed in our dashboards after release. However, for CrowdStrike Falcon, we cannot see these features.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable aspect of Bugcrowd is that it provides a long list of different websites or web applications where I can report vulnerabilities."

"One of the features I like most about Bugcrowd is the ability to create a report in a very easy way."

"Bugcrowd's support team is very active and supportive."

"Bugcrowd's use of crowdsourced hackers has helped in discovering unique vulnerabilities."

"Bugcrowd has programs that disclose rewards and invite researchers to new programs."

"Working on Bugcrowd has made me a better security engineer since it provides a competitive environment to report successful vulnerabilities."

"I believe Bugcrowd is highly stable."

"I would rate Bugcrowd a ten out of ten."

"The solution can scale easily."

"It has good features for threat detection."

"Everything is automatic. I install the sensor and renew the service. Periodically, I get a notice that they've shut something down."

"It's very easy to set up."

"Because it is security product and acts like an AIML smart product, not merely based on daily/weekly updates and signatures."

"The stability is good; we haven't experienced any glitches or bugs."

"I like the feature called RTC, the remote time connector."

"We like Falcon's network visibility. We can see how threats are evolving on PCS or in the company network. The solution's real-time incident response is very fast."

More CrowdStrike Falcon pros

Cons

"Bugcrowd should provide more access to the reports, similar to HackerOne, allowing for full disclosure once a bug is resolved, so researchers can learn from them. They should improve the responsibility type and response time of their customer support, especially when the issue is urgent."

"The triaging process has slowed down compared to three years ago. It now takes more time to resolve a reported vulnerability and receive the payout."

"Bugcrowd should provide more access to the reports, similar to HackerOne, allowing for full disclosure once a bug is resolved, so researchers can learn from them."

"There is room for improvement in Bugcrowd's response time when customer input is needed for resolving tickets."

"Bugcrowd could be improved or enhanced as they seem to have a lot of internal churn at the moment, so they could be more stable and more customer-focused."

"There is room for improvement in Bugcrowd's response time when customer input is needed for resolving tickets. If this time could be minimized, it would be very helpful."

"The triaging process has slowed down compared to three years ago."

"Dashboard creation is one of the areas for improvement in CrowdStrike Falcon. Sometimes, management asks for a custom dashboard, so my team has to collect data from CrowdStrike Falcon, integrate that in Splunk, then create the dashboard in Splunk. The Splunk dashboard is more elaborate, so the CrowdStrike Falcon dashboard needs improvement. Another area for improvement in the tool is the malware detection report, as it needs to be more detailed and include some graphics so that if you want to present that data in a nutshell, it's easier to do. For example, the report should consist of some graphical representation that shows a month's worth of data. In terms of an additional feature I'd like CrowdStrike Falcon to have, it's the device posture assessment feature that detects the device posture within the network. Whichever device connects to the corporate network, my company should be able to analyze the device posture. Then there should be communication with the network, which means that as soon as a device connects, CrowdStrike Falcon can assess the device posture, detect its corporate asset, and decide whether it should be allowed on the network."

"It does take more time to scan than other solutions."

"Deployment in cloud environments is challenging. Another concern is CrowdStrike's GUI. It changes annually, making it hard to work and find options."

"The pricing structure should allow for some flexibility."

"The installation process for this software needs to be simplified."

"The product could be more accurate in terms of performance."

"If we have a dashboard capability to uninstall agents, I think that would be great."

"The biggest issue occurred when every computer worldwide experienced a blue screen."

More CrowdStrike Falcon cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Crowdstrike Falcon is relatively cheap."

"The price is high in comparison to similar brands."

"Purchasing the product through the AWS Marketplace is just a click away. Since we were using the on-premise version of the product, we continued on the cloud by purchasing it through the AWS Marketplace."

"The pricing on CrowdStrike is per license. It was about $42 per seat yearly."

"CrowdStrike is well priced. On a yearly basis, it costs between $60 and $100 per user."

"Years ago, when we bought CrowdStrike, you got everything it had. I was a little concerned when they broke this out into a la carte modules where you can buy EDR, Spotlight, etc., picking and choosing off the menu. I was a little worried that the solution would get watered down. However, I realized in my previous organization when we had the full suite that there were a bunch of features in it that we didn't have time to operationalize. So, I warmed up to it. I get the whole, "Look, you can pick and choose. Okay, everybody buys a steak, but do you want mashed potatoes, or do you want lobster mac and cheese?" So, you can pick the sides that you want, so you can buy the solution that you want and operationalize versus paying a lot of money and getting a bunch of things, but not using 60 percent of the tools in the box."

"CrowdStrike Falcon can be more expensive than some competitors, and its base price doesn't cover every feature."

"The price is too high."

More CrowdStrike Falcon pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Attack Surface Management (ASM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,443 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

University

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	46
Midsize Enterprise	34
Large Enterprise	62

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bugcrowd?

I think the pricing and licensing of Bugcrowd are expensive, but we do get good value from it, as we find vulnerabilities that we would otherwise be unaware of.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Bugcrowd?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Bugcrowd?

I work with Bugcrowd mostly as a crowdsourcing security platform. I use Bugcrowd by putting a brief on Bugcrowd's website, and then their community of security researchers hunt for vulnerabilities ...

See all answers

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions that are very scalable, secure, and user-friendly. Cortex XDR by Palo Alto offers ...

See all answers

How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with Darktrace?

Both of these products perform similarly and have many outstanding attributes. CrowdStrike Falcon offers an amazing user interface that makes setup easy and seamless. CrowdStrike Falcon offers a cl...

See all answers

How does Microsoft Defender for Endpoint compare with Crowdstrike Falcon?

The CrowdStrike solution delivers a lot of information about incidents. It has a very light sensor that will never push your machine hardware to "test", you don't have the usual "scan now" feature ...

See all answers

Comparisons

HackerOne vs Bugcrowd

Compared 57% of the time

Synack vs Bugcrowd

Compared 20% of the time

YesWeHack vs Bugcrowd

Compared 10% of the time

Intigriti vs Bugcrowd

Compared 5% of the time

Crowdcurity vs Bugcrowd

Compared 3% of the time

More Bugcrowd Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs CrowdStrike Falcon

Compared 4% of the time

Fortinet FortiEDR vs CrowdStrike Falcon

Compared 3% of the time

Microsoft Defender XDR vs CrowdStrike Falcon

Compared 3% of the time

Darktrace vs CrowdStrike Falcon

Compared 2% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs CrowdStrike Falcon

Compared 2% of the time

More CrowdStrike Falcon Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Managed Security Services Providers (MSSP)

December 2025

Download Bugcrowd product report

Buyer's Guide

CrowdStrike Falcon

December 2025

Download CrowdStrike Falcon product report

Also Known As

No data available

CrowdStrike Falcon, CrowdStrike Falcon XDR, CrowdStrike Falcon Threat Intelligence, CrowdStrike Identity Protection, CrowdStrike Falcon Surface, CrowdStrike Falcon Platform

Overview

By combining a vast and diverse workforce with a results-driven model, crowdsourced security programs outperform traditional methods-every time.

Bugcrowd

CrowdStrike Falcon offers robust endpoint protection and threat detection, leveraging cloud-native architecture and AI-driven capabilities for advanced security. Its design ensures minimal system impact, making it a preferred choice for organizations seeking efficient protection solutions.

CrowdStrike Falcon provides comprehensive security features, including endpoint detection and response, real-time threat insights, and advanced AI-driven detection mechanisms. Its cloud-native architecture facilitates effortless scalability and seamless integration with cloud services, securing endpoints, servers, and roaming users. While Falcon delivers strong threat intelligence and automated detection, it faces challenges in operating system compatibility, reports require enhancements, and integration with some technologies is limited. High pricing and occasional false positives are noted areas for improvement, along with expanded support for older systems.

What are the key features of CrowdStrike Falcon?

Endpoint Detection and Response: Offers real-time threat tracking and quick reaction capabilities.
AI-Driven Threat Detection: Utilizes machine learning for identifying sophisticated threats.
Cloud-Native Architecture: Ensures seamless scalability and integration with cloud platforms.
Lightweight Design: Minimizes impact on system performance for efficient operation.
Remote Access and Isolation: Facilitates remote endpoint management and network protection.

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

Comprehensive Dashboards: Provides detailed insights for informed decision-making.
Scalability: Handles expansion effortlessly as organizational needs grow.
Threat Intelligence: Enhances security strategies with robust data.
Reduced Resource Consumption: Operates efficiently, saving on system resources.

In industries requiring fortified cybersecurity measures, CrowdStrike Falcon is deployed for endpoint protection and incident response. It offers advanced threat defense and integrates well with cloud services, making it a suitable replacement for traditional antivirus solutions. For sectors engaging in forensic investigations and real-time malware defense, Falcon's capabilities align with their security demands, serving industries from healthcare to finance.

CrowdStrike

Sample Customers

Zephyr Health, Barracuda Networks, Western Union, Instructure, Aruba Networks, Pinterest, CARD.com, WINK, (ISC)2, StatusPage, WHMCS, Movember

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Bugcrowd vs. CrowdStrike Falcon

December 2025

Free Report: Bugcrowd vs. CrowdStrike Falcon

Find out what your peers are saying about Bugcrowd vs. CrowdStrike Falcon and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,443 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Bugcrowd vs. CrowdStrike Falcon report.

See our list of best Attack Surface Management (ASM) vendors.

We monitor all Attack Surface Management (ASM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.