Broadcom Payment Security vs ThreatMetrix comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Broadcom and ThreatMetrix are both solutions in the Fraud Detection and Prevention category. Broadcom is ranked #15, while ThreatMetrix is ranked #1. Broadcom holds a 1.9% mindshare in FDP, compared to ThreatMetrix’s 4.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of ThreatMetrix users who would recommend it.

Broadcom Payment Security

Read 16 Broadcom Payment Security reviews

1,604 Views
1,588 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ThreatMetrix

Read 8 ThreatMetrix reviews

3,464 Views
3,395 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Broadcom Payment Security

ThreatMetrix

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 12, 2024

Broadcom Payment Security and ThreatMetrix compete in the fraud prevention and security space. ThreatMetrix has the advantage due to its advanced features and comprehensive global data network, enhancing its fraud prediction capabilities.

Features: Broadcom Payment Security provides robust transaction monitoring, score-based risk analysis, and multi-factor authentication. ThreatMetrix offers advanced device intelligence, behavioral analytics, and a global shared intelligence network, allowing effective fraud prediction.

Room for Improvement: Broadcom Payment Security could enhance its ease of deployment and tailor its transaction monitoring further. ThreatMetrix can improve initial cost accessibility, expand its user interface features, and enhance integration documentation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ThreatMetrix excels in seamless integration and comprehensive customer support, facilitating quick deployment across digital channels. Broadcom Payment Security provides robust support but requires a more tailored deployment approach.

Pricing and ROI: Broadcom Payment Security offers budget-friendly entry with predictable pricing and balanced ROI. ThreatMetrix involves higher upfront costs but provides superior ROI through significant fraud reduction and digital identity protection.

To learn more, read our detailed Broadcom Payment Security vs. ThreatMetrix Report (Updated: November 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Broadcom Payment Security vs. ThreatMetrix

November 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,939 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Broadcom Payment Security

Ranking in Fraud Detection and Prevention

15th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

ThreatMetrix

Ranking in Fraud Detection and Prevention

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Fraud Detection and Prevention category, the mindshare of Broadcom Payment Security is 1.9%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ThreatMetrix is 4.4%, down from 9.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Fraud Detection and Prevention Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
ThreatMetrix	4.4%
Broadcom Payment Security	1.9%
Other	93.7%

Fraud Detection and Prevention

Featured Reviews

Jan-Bas Pietersen

Consultant Fraud Risk Management at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees

We are using the product for 3D Secure authentication and fraud prevention

For CA Risk Analytics, we would like to have some statistics available, to do some counting on the number of transactions for example. Also, to have the ability not only for 3D Secure, but accross all online channels. Online banking and App. Because then you would have three online channels. You would have the same device data, so you can combine it. So then you would have an online banking platform, an app, and 3D Secure all from one supplier. This supplier would support all of our authentication methods across those three channels. That's our ultimate goal to have one supplier to support all three online channels.

Read full review

Sohom Roy

Senior Director at CSS Corp

Enables to identify and analyze real-time incidents and mitigate risks

The setup is not complex. It is pretty standard. I rate the ease of setup a nine out of ten. The deployment time depends on the applications and environment into which we integrate it. The product provides a lot of API documentation. The product is cloud-based. One or two people are enough to deploy the solution. We need some maintenance when new versions or patches need to be upgraded. It requires minimal maintenance.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The service works as described, the Admin console is very good along with customer service, and the management support, which is excellent."

"For us, it enables the bank or the issuer to offer their customers protection on their online transactions."

"I think the performance from my organization's perspective is excellent in terms of minimizing the friction on genuine transactions with genuine customers, whilst optimizing the bad transactions, the fraudulent transactions that it stops."

"I think for us, the value that we get out of CA is their effective scheme diagnostics."

"For a bank, we've seen transactions move to e-commerce. We needed a solution that would protect the bank and protect the bank's cardholders, and that's what this solution gives us."

"The technical support team is professional and attentive to our needs and concerns."

"This is a good product, which is easy to deploy and has lot of user friendly features."

"Helped reduce 3-D Secure losses to one of the lowest in the industry while having minimal customer impact."

More Broadcom Payment Security pros

"The fact that we were able to much more easily detect if people were using VPN for travels, which country they were accessing the platform from, and we had access to a large amount of new data points that we previously didn't have was really useful for us."

"The solution can be easily integrated with applications."

"The most valuable feature the solution has is that it is able to do a fairly accurate fraud assessment of a credit card transaction, and the rules used in fraud scoring can be based on many transaction attributes such as purchased IP address (country), amount, email address, etc., with scoring rules configured by the merchant."

"The user interface, the portal, is very helpful in describing what attributes of concern are associated with the device."

"The profiling of it that can show me many of the details of the client, the speed is very good, and the way they set up rules from their experience, like collecting the rules from other banks and other enterprises, is very helpful."

"The solution is stable."

"The most valuable thing is about the IP. They have a database of malicious IP addresses against which they check. They have a huge database for routed devices and the devices that have been used in the past to commit fraud. They have extensive historical records of all of that information, and that's probably the most valuable thing about ThreatMetrix. Over the years, they have been collecting and persisting globally across all the banking and financial services. They have been storing all this information. It is this stored information that I and my team find valuable; it is not so much their technology. If you are running it on a simulator and trying to maliciously clone and copy IP addresses and stuff like that, they have a bunch of technologies, like routes section and all the other stuff. It is just that they have something that no one else can deal with, that is, massive amounts of big data about the malicious IP addresses, malicious device fingerprinting, the fingerprinting router devices, and the fingerprints. You can query against this stored information to find out whether your app is in a good, nice environment. If yes, you get a green light. The last time I checked, there were about 400 or 500 features that they can stack against, which is pretty extensive. They give you a score against all those features for every application that you installed on it. It is pretty good in that sense."

"After using ThreatMetrix solution, we were able to figure out the compromised devices and doing so helped to find that 1400 devices are compromised, and we were able to not allow payment, a standing order, direct debit, or any other kind of payment, and that ultimately protects us and the user."

More ThreatMetrix pros

Cons

"There have been service outages/incidents and work has to be chased, for completion or comment."

"In the first two years, there were several issues with stability."

"Unifying operational changes around highlighting. If you highlight one item, it will highlight the one card that's affected across the board."

"This solution can improve around the challenge rates and the failures."

"Sometimes, there is a bit of language issue of understanding problems."

"That's the one complaint we have had is the lack of mobile signal."

"This is the one area where there's room for improvement. I think that is the one area where improvements can be made in terms of speed of response, in terms of quality of response, and in terms of more so a proactive problem monitoring."

"The service is improving with the implementation of 3D Secure 2.0."

More Broadcom Payment Security cons

"The pricing could be lower. We are a young company; maybe for big enterprises, price doesn't matter, however, for young companies, price-wise, it's not that good; it's a bit pricey."

"I think the solution has some way to go in terms of its user-friendly nature, and in terms of some of the dashboards and metrics that it provides."

"SDK is probably where the biggest issue is. The SDK configuration is a bit lacking, and if you are integrating it into your workflow, it is very cumbersome and very difficult to integrate."

"We are only using one feature. We haven't found the other features to be very good or very powerful."

"One limitation is it only maintains six months' worth of data. It would be nice if it went back even further to help us really identify and flush out patterns that go on longer."

"SDK is probably where the biggest issue is. The SDK configuration is a bit lacking. If you are integrating it into your workflow, it is very cumbersome and very difficult to integrate. You have to understand and be an expert in low-level mobile applications to integrate this stuff. Integration should be easy based on what they are providing, but unfortunately, it is not. It is very difficult. My work has been trying to simplify the integration process because integrations bring a lot of value. Most companies don't see their value because it is such a difficult process. For integration, you have to get it right as well, but it is very difficult to get it right because they don't help you in tuning your future parameters. Because of this, it is very difficult to tune your future parameters and your risk score. If you are Uber, your risk score will be very different from a banking client that is pushing funds. These two things need to be improved for me. The rest is pretty good."

"Could be more intuitive and user friendly."

"The interface does look a bit outdated."

More ThreatMetrix cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Utilize the transaction pricing model versus the active cards because the ability to monitor active cards hasn’t been good."

"I am not aware of the price. I have always come in after it has been negotiated. The clients do get a return on their investment. It mitigated a massive DDoS, and it definitely detects fraudulent activities on banking platforms. They have definitely got their ROI back because there is continued investment in ThreatMetrix over time."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Fraud Detection and Prevention solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,939 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

15%

Construction Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

36%

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	12

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Large Enterprise	4

Comparisons

Broadcom EMV 3-D Secure (3DS) vs Broadcom Payment Security

Compared 9% of the time

Forter vs Broadcom Payment Security

Compared 7% of the time

Riskified vs Broadcom Payment Security

Compared 7% of the time

IBM Trusteer vs Broadcom Payment Security

Compared 6% of the time

IdentityMind vs Broadcom Payment Security

Compared 6% of the time

More Broadcom Payment Security Competitors

BioCatch vs ThreatMetrix

Compared 8% of the time

FICO Falcon Platform vs ThreatMetrix

Compared 7% of the time

Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management vs ThreatMetrix

Compared 4% of the time

Riskified vs ThreatMetrix

Compared 4% of the time

Featurespace ARIC Fraud Hub vs ThreatMetrix

Compared 4% of the time

More ThreatMetrix Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Broadcom Payment Security

November 2026

Download Broadcom Payment Security product report

Buyer's Guide

ThreatMetrix

October 2026

Download ThreatMetrix product report

Also Known As

CA Risk Analytics, CA Transaction Manager, CA Payment Security Suite

No data available

Overview

Broadcom Payment Security offers an advanced security technology suite designed to safeguard payment transactions, ensuring reduced fraud and greater financial safety.

Broadcom Payment Security provides robust fraud prevention methods that cater to tackling current payment security challenges. Its advanced analytics feature predicts and mitigates potential fraudulent activities, enhancing the safety of transactions. Users can expect reliable protection across multiple financial platforms, integrating seamlessly with existing systems, which empowers financial institutions to manage risks efficiently.

What are the key features of Broadcom Payment Security?

Fraud Detection: Utilizes machine learning algorithms to detect suspicious activities in real-time.
Real-Time Analytics: Offers comprehensive insights to make informed decisions quickly.
Multi-Platform Integration: Easily integrates with existing financial systems for improved functionality.

What benefits or ROI should users consider when evaluating Broadcom Payment Security?

Reduced Fraud Losses: Significant decrease in fraudulent transactions leads to cost savings.
Increased Safety: Enhanced security measures build customer trust and satisfaction.
Improved Decision-Making: Access to detailed analytics aids in better strategic planning.

Broadcom Payment Security is leveraged across industries such as banking and retail, enhancing transaction security with its adaptable framework. In banking, it helps in monitoring vast numbers of transactions to quickly flag and address threats, while in retail, it safeguards ecommerce platforms by ensuring payment integrity and boosting customer confidence in online purchases.

Broadcom

ThreatMetrix leverages a large database of malicious IP addresses and device fingerprints to enable effective fraud assessment using historical data. Real-time analytics and customizable scoring rules help identify suspicious transactions, supporting fraud detection across diverse platforms.

ThreatMetrix is renowned for its seamless integration with custom applications and device profiling, offering a robust system for risk mitigation through real-time analytics. While documentation is excellent and product enhancements are proactive, some challenges include cumbersome SDK integration and limited data retention at six months. Users often face difficulties due to its unintuitive rule engine, data overload, and high pricing. Additional tools may be needed for comprehensive protection beyond core features. Despite an outdated interface, many utilize ThreatMetrix for its functionality in fraud prevention, particularly across mobile and banking domains.

What are the key features of ThreatMetrix?

Massive Database: Utilizes an extensive repository of malicious IPs and device fingerprints for fraud detection.
Customizable Scoring Rules: Enables tailored fraud detection.
Real-time Analytics: Facilitates immediate risk mitigation.
Seamless Integration: Easy connection with custom applications for device profiling.
Proactive Enhancements: Features frequent updates and excellent documentation.

What benefits can users expect from ThreatMetrix?

Improved Fraud Detection: Advanced analytics aid in identifying suspicious activity.
Scalability: Adapts to unique business needs across platforms.
Efficient Risk Assessment: Real-time data enables quick response to threats.
Customization: Tailored rules enhance fraud prevention strategy.
Integration Capabilities: Smooth connectivity with existing systems.

Many organizations implement ThreatMetrix to enhance security in mobile applications, retail environments, and banking sectors. By using SDK and API integrations, they can maintain device identity, ensure secure transactions, and conduct thorough threat and risk assessments, addressing challenges like DDoS threats and ghost brokering.

ThreatMetrix

Sample Customers

Eurocard

Trip Advisor, Stone Hub, TD Bank, Rabobank, GoPro

Buyer's Guide

Broadcom Payment Security vs. ThreatMetrix

November 2026

Free Report: Broadcom Payment Security vs. ThreatMetrix

Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom Payment Security vs. ThreatMetrix and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,939 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Broadcom Payment Security vs. ThreatMetrix report.

See our list of best Fraud Detection and Prevention vendors.

We monitor all Fraud Detection and Prevention reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.