We performed a comparison between Boomi AtomSphere Integration and TIBCO BusinessWorks based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
"It is easy to learn and implement."
"Boomi AtomSphere Integration is stable."
"Low-code development is the most valuable feature."
"I have found the solution to be scalable."
"It is a low-code and high-configuration platform, which is very valuable. Develop once and run anywhere is another useful feature. It also has connectors for more than 200 applications. It provides value for money. Our customers who have implemented this solution have a very high ROI."
"The most important thing is that it is easy for developers to work with."
"Good TIBCO BusinessWorks features are the admin console and the ability to roll back to the previous version."
"Areas for improvement would be the cloud fitness of the product and the ease of migrating to newer versions."
"The high availability, tolerance, and load balancing features are top-notch. Its scalability features are also pretty cool."
"Good performance and reliability."
"It is a seamless and sophisticated tool."
"One of the most valuable features is that it's a simple development. It takes a short time to get services to work."
"One of the most valuable features is data transformation. We have some legacy systems which are in old technology, like SOAP, whereas the new ones are in REST. So we use BusinessWorks to transform data from one format to another, from SOAP to REST."
"There should be more scripting possibilities."
"It crashes if we run high-volume integration."
"They need to introduce more configurable functions to remove scripting or coding. Scripting should be minimized. It should have exhaustive functions. Currently, it lacks in this aspect."
"They are lacking in some streaming features, and messaging features from a listener's point of view."
"The product could be a little bit more user-friendly."
"There are multiple plugins which increase the number of product installations."
"Scaling with the solution is costly because if we need to scale up, we have to buy more memory. That means more money. Solutions like Camel or Pulsar come with built-in options to scale horizontally, vertically, region-wide or country-wide."
"The Business Studio tool can be improved, which is the tool for designing the processes. Improving the Business Studio tool will make this solution more stable. It has a steep learning curve, and it is pretty tough to learn."
"Its price can be improved. For medium enterprises, it is a very expensive tool. In the market, you won't get many resources for this solution. You won't find many developers in the market very easily. The latest version of TIBCO (6.4 or 6.x) is not very stable. It has got many issues. We have raised this with TIBCO, and they are taking a lot of time to come up with a fix, which is making us move away from this product. Some of the performance-tuning aspects are also missing in version 6. They should provide performance-related fixes, which will be helpful for the customers. If you are migrating from the current version to the container-supported version, it is quite expensive. The product has evolved, but it is very pricey. That's one of the challenges. They have provided all the features that are there in other products, but this is a platform upgrade. The platform has completely been changed from 5.x to 6.x, and we can't use the same environment. We can't run both versions on the same server as VM. The development environment is entirely different. In version 5.x, there was a proprietary designer. Now, it has common plug-ins developed on top of Eclipse."
"Could be more user friendly in the development area."
"The cost of this product is too expensive for smaller companies or those with a small number of integrations."
"Cloud fitness is lacking"
"TIBCO BusinessWorks could be improved with cloud support."
The Boomi AtomSphere integration platform as a service (iPaaS) supports all your application integration processes – between cloud platforms, software-as-a-service applications, and on-premises systems. Your entire team has online access to a powerful range of integration and data management capabilities, that can be realized in a fraction of the time of legacy middleware technologies.
Boomi AtomSphere Integration is ranked 7th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 5 reviews while TIBCO BusinessWorks is ranked 14th in Data Integration Tools with 9 reviews. Boomi AtomSphere Integration is rated 8.0, while TIBCO BusinessWorks is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Boomi AtomSphere Integration writes "A good integration tool that is stable, but has a complex initial setup". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TIBCO BusinessWorks writes "Useful features, but needs monitoring and cloud improvements". Boomi AtomSphere Integration is most compared with Oracle Integration Cloud Service, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, SSIS, Azure Data Factory and Informatica PowerCenter, whereas TIBCO BusinessWorks is most compared with Mule Anypoint Platform, Spring Cloud Data Flow, webMethods Integration Server, Informatica PowerCenter and Talend Open Studio. See our Boomi AtomSphere Integration vs. TIBCO BusinessWorks report.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.