We performed a comparison between Boomi AtomSphere Integration and TIBCO BusinessWorks based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The Salesforce and NetSuite Application specific “connectors” provide a layer of abstraction on top of the SOAP-based APIs to streamline integration development."
"The product's integration features are quite rich and low code. It is easy to use."
"I have found the solution to be scalable."
"The best features are that it is a cloud-based and a multi-tenant tool."
"It is a low-code and high-configuration platform, which is very valuable. Develop once and run anywhere is another useful feature. It also has connectors for more than 200 applications. It provides value for money. Our customers who have implemented this solution have a very high ROI."
"It is easy to learn and implement."
"This solution has a user-friendly interface and very good documentation with solutions that helped us in working with the tool efficiently."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its monitoring part to debug certain issues and find problems."
"The solution is stable. We haven't had any serious technical issues."
"The most important thing is that it is easy for developers to work with."
"We use the solution to develop applications."
"BusinessWorks reduces development time, helping developers to focus on business logic."
"The solution is very scalable. It can handle a lot. We have encryption plus integration servers running on that platform currently."
"It is a seamless and sophisticated tool."
"It is user friendly, it's not complex."
"One of the most valuable features is data transformation. We have some legacy systems which are in old technology, like SOAP, whereas the new ones are in REST. So we use BusinessWorks to transform data from one format to another, from SOAP to REST."
"They need to introduce more configurable functions to remove scripting or coding. Scripting should be minimized. It should have exhaustive functions. Currently, it lacks in this aspect."
"The product's UI could be more convenient."
"It crashes if we run high-volume integration."
"It is a costly platform. Its pricing could be better."
"There are more mature (dedicated) API management and master data management (MDM) solutions available in the market."
"The deployment was simple, but the implementation is missing a lot of capabilities."
"We encountered stability issues occasionally, one to two times a year."
"Documentation could be improved."
"Its price can be improved. For medium enterprises, it is a very expensive tool. In the market, you won't get many resources for this solution. You won't find many developers in the market very easily. The latest version of TIBCO (6.4 or 6.x) is not very stable. It has got many issues. We have raised this with TIBCO, and they are taking a lot of time to come up with a fix, which is making us move away from this product. Some of the performance-tuning aspects are also missing in version 6. They should provide performance-related fixes, which will be helpful for the customers. If you are migrating from the current version to the container-supported version, it is quite expensive. The product has evolved, but it is very pricey. That's one of the challenges. They have provided all the features that are there in other products, but this is a platform upgrade. The platform has completely been changed from 5.x to 6.x, and we can't use the same environment. We can't run both versions on the same server as VM. The development environment is entirely different. In version 5.x, there was a proprietary designer. Now, it has common plug-ins developed on top of Eclipse."
"The Business Studio tool can be improved, which is the tool for designing the processes. Improving the Business Studio tool will make this solution more stable. It has a steep learning curve, and it is pretty tough to learn."
"Technical support is average. It's not the best."
"Could be more user friendly in the development area."
"I would like the solution to be integrated into the cloud."
"This solution's cloud could be improved. I don't know whether it was because we didn't have the internal expertise or if it was the product itself, but since they came later—I think only two or three years into the cloud—after many other iPaaS that had been in the cloud for longer, I feel that maybe they haven't matured in terms of the cloud."
"There are multiple plugins which increase the number of product installations."
"The technical support's turnaround time is an area where TIBCO needs to consider improvements...Getting support from TIBCO on a particular issue takes a lot of turnaround time."
Boomi AtomSphere Integration is ranked 5th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 25 reviews while TIBCO BusinessWorks is ranked 18th in Data Integration with 23 reviews. Boomi AtomSphere Integration is rated 7.8, while TIBCO BusinessWorks is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Boomi AtomSphere Integration writes "Stable product, suitable for limited integrations and lacks flexibility ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TIBCO BusinessWorks writes "Reliable integration solution with robust communication capabilities and good scalability". Boomi AtomSphere Integration is most compared with Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, webMethods Integration Server, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SSIS and SAP Process Orchestration, whereas TIBCO BusinessWorks is most compared with webMethods Integration Server, Mule Anypoint Platform, Spring Cloud Data Flow, Confluent and WSO2 Enterprise Integrator. See our Boomi AtomSphere Integration vs. TIBCO BusinessWorks report.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
