Board vs Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center comparison

Board International and Interfacing Technologies Corporation are both solutions in the BI (Business Intelligence) Tools category. Board International is ranked #20 with an average rating of 8.3, while Interfacing Technologies Corporation is ranked #29 with an average rating of 8.0. Board International holds a 0.6% mindshare in BIT, compared to Interfacing Technologies Corporation’s 0.0% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of Board International users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of Interfacing Technologies Corporation users who would recommend it.

Board

Read 37 Board reviews

1,697 Views
492 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Interfacing Technologies En...

Read 2 Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center reviews

225 Views
9 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

Board

Interfacing Technologies En...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Board and Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two BI (Business Intelligence) Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Board vs. Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Board vs. Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,140 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Board

Ranking in BI (Business Intelligence) Tools

20th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Performance Management (8th), Reporting (16th)

Interfacing Technologies En...

Ranking in BI (Business Intelligence) Tools

29th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Management (BPM) (35th), GRC (21st), Quality Management Software (23rd), Document Management Software (19th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the BI (Business Intelligence) Tools category, the mindshare of Board is 0.6%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center is 0.0%. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

BI (Business Intelligence) Tools

Featured Reviews

Wiboon Thabsuwan

Senior Consultant at IMD Company Limited

Easy to use and requires less time to learn or understand its features

I think the product is good in terms of ease of use. The interface looks really nice and very easy to use. Every command appears in the icon. It looks like you don't have to understand everything about the command. You do not necessarily have to know more, or I would say that there is less time for our study about the products. Functionality-wise, it is quite easy to use and requires less time to understand or learn about the product. I am a software vendor, so I do not use the tool myself. I use it for my clients. My clients mostly use it for budgeting and timing purposes. I would say that's really less maintenance at all because they can do everything by themselves. It is good in terms of ease of use.

Read full review

SantoshKulkarni1

Consultant at a consultancy with 11-50 employees

A Robust Solution with Enhanced Automation and Process Improvement Identification Capabilities

I recommend that users invest more time in the initial setup of the process architecture within the tool. It is crucial to spend time designing how the process architecture works as it significantly impacts how the tool behaves. This upfront investment can prevent the need for extensive reworking later on.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"With the combination of 24/7 global support and their community, there was great customer service, tech support, and community support."

"All staff can now see their relevant scorecards online."

"The aesthetics of it are really nice. That is what attracted us to BOARD: the ease and functionality of it."

"we are able to easily export data. When directors need financial information, we can go in the system and export the data, then send it out so they have it ready and available. If they are not in the office, we can email it to them. In addition, all the managers are now more on top of their expenses and their budget."

"The ability to create a data model and have it in testing within a week is fantastic."

"Primary valuable features are its flexibility and versatility and, obviously, functionality goes along with that. Plus, it does that at a small footprint in the file servers, and does it very efficiently."

"I think it's flexible. I chose this solution because, even though it wasn't out-of-the-box, you can customize it, and the long-term growth potential of the software is where I see the value."

"It is useful for self-analysis regarding company data and helps to find areas where we can improve."

More Board pros

"One notable software-related benefit from a user perspective is our improved ability to identify opportunities for automation and process enhancement just by gaining a clearer view of the processes. There are two valuable aspects. First, setting up the process architecture is commendable. Second, not having to maintain different versions of processes is a notable benefit. The solution is stable. The support team is responsive."

"The most valuable feature is the integrated manner in which all the capabilities of the Enterprise Process Center platform work together and make it easier to complete the documentation of processes."

Cons

"It's very powerful, but there is also a big learning curve. It should be a little more intuitive."

"I would like an eLearning platform for BOARD."

"We are looking at ways to improve how we deal with security in BOARD and other similar things. "

"What could be better is the manual... nowadays, most people use a web client, but on the Board manual website, a lot of the information is only about the Windows client. If they could update that, it would be helpful."

"We can't delete entities and cubes in Boards because it interrupts our whole data model."

"My analysts have used the technical support. Sometimes they have felt like they did not receive the answer that they needed, or you have to go and upgrade in order to address a problem. "

"Some of our users are still using an MS Office add-in for Excel for certain calculations, and when they export from Board, some of the values, some of the totals and column names, are not coming through into Excel."

"Board's integration could be a bit more robust, but what we have works. If the design isn't right, the flexibility of Board can negatively impact performance."

More Board cons

"As with all such platforms, Enterprise Process Center is a complex tool and there are many capabilities and features that take time to learn."

"However, on the process mining side, there's potential for improvement to gain deeper insights into process functionality. Additionally, there's always room for enhancement in the user interface."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is quite expensive, if it is made cheaper then we can have more clients. I rate it four out of ten."

"In terms of the pricing, it was reasonable. BOARD is not the lowest in the market, but it was reasonable for us."

"Find a partner who will take responsibility for the implementation, and be available for support."

"It is not the cheapest product on earth, but you get so much. It provides good value for money."

"The tool's price is a bit high compared to other solutions."

"My advice for anybody who is implementing this product is to understand what options you believe you are going to want to implement and rollout in the first three to five years, but spend the most time understanding what the set-up costs and pricing will be in the first two or maybe three."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which BI (Business Intelligence) Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,140 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Is Board better than Anaplan as a Business Intelligence (BI) solution?

We've had several FP&A departments include Anaplan in their analytics discussions, and while BI information IS generated, the focus is generally on compiling input from various sources and simu...

See all answers

What do you like most about Board?

All the reports are prepared automatically.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Board?

Board's integration could be a bit more robust, but what we have works. If the design isn't right, the flexibility of Board can negatively impact performance.

See all answers

What do you like most about Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center?

One notable software-related benefit from a user perspective is our improved ability to identify opportunities for automation and process enhancement just by gaining a clearer view of the processe...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center?

While we have yet to explore the tool's capabilities fully, I can't think of any immediate drawbacks. However, on the process mining side, there's potential for improvement to gain deeper insights ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center?

We use the solution for finance processes, specifically for accounts payable and accounts receivable.

See all answers

Comparisons

Anaplan vs Board

Compared 26% of the time

Pigment vs Board

Compared 13% of the time

Microsoft Power BI vs Board

Compared 10% of the time

Oracle Hyperion vs Board

Compared 8% of the time

Jedox vs Board

Compared 7% of the time

More Board Competitors

iGrafx Process360 Live Platform vs Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center

Compared 100% of the time

More Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Board

August 2025

Download Board product report

Buyer's Guide

BI (Business Intelligence) Tools

August 2025

Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center report

Download Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center product report

Also Known As

No data available

Enterprise Process Center

Overview

BOARD International - headquartered in Switzerland - is a leading global provider of software for improving business results through better decision making. By unifying Business Intelligence and Corporate Performance Management into a single product, BOARD enables companies to achieve a shared vision of their performance across the entire organization, and thus a single version of the truth.

BOARD provides seamless solutions for • Reporting & Analysis • Budgeting, Planning & Forecasting • Profitability Modelling & Optimization • Simulation & What-if-Analysis • Scorecarding & Strategy Management • Financial Consolidation. Based on visual modelling, BOARD has enabled global companies to deploy BI and CPM applications without a single line of code in a fraction of the time and cost associated with traditional solutions.

Board International

Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center by Interfacing Technologies Corporation integrates AI-powered enterprise software for managing operations, ensuring compliance, and driving improvement in regulated organizations.

Combining QMS, DMS, BPM, and GRC within a single platform, Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center standardizes processes and reduces risk. It provides real-time insights and adapts to changing regulations, designed for industries like aerospace and life sciences. With ISO 27001 certification, GDPR, and CFR Part 11 compliance, it meets strict global security standards. Recognized by Gartner as a leader in DTO solutions, this platform offers precision and transparency through 25 years of expertise.

What features make Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center valuable?

Quality Management: Enhances efficiency and compliance in processes.
Document Management: Centralizes information and ensures traceability.
Business Process Management: Automates workflows for operational excellence.
Governance, Risk & Compliance: Provides control and audit readiness.

What should users look for in reviews?

Operational Insight: Real-time insights into processes for better decisions.
Risk Reduction: Minimizes compliance risks and enhances security.
Adaptability: Quickly responds to changes in regulatory landscapes.

In aerospace and life sciences, Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center implementation ensures compliance and operational control. It's crucial for manufacturing and government sectors seeking adaptability and precision due to their complex regulatory requirements.

Interfacing Technologies Corporation

Sample Customers

Coca-Cola, Puma, Desigual, Ricoh, KPMG, H&M, Groupe SEB

Pepsi-Cola Manufacturing International Ltd., Pfizer Deutschland GmbH, GlaxoSmithKline, Johnson & Johnson, Bayer S.p.A., KPMG, Royal Australian Air, Orange

Buyer's Guide

Board vs. Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center

July 2025

Free Report: Board vs. Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center

Find out what your peers are saying about Board vs. Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,140 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Board vs. Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center report.

See our list of best BI (Business Intelligence) Tools vendors.

We monitor all BI (Business Intelligence) Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.