Board vs Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center comparison

Board International and Interfacing Technologies Corporation are both solutions in the BI (Business Intelligence) Tools category. Board International is ranked #22 with an average rating of 8.3, while Interfacing Technologies Corporation is ranked #142. Board International holds a 1.0% mindshare in BIT, compared to Interfacing Technologies Corporation’s 0.1% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of Board International users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of Interfacing Technologies Corporation users who would recommend it.

Board

Read 37 Board reviews

2,317 Views
1,019 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Interfacing Technologies En...

Read 2 Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center reviews

640 Views
90 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

Board

Interfacing Technologies En...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Board and Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two BI (Business Intelligence) Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Board vs. Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Board vs. Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 880,954 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Board

Ranking in BI (Business Intelligence) Tools

22nd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Performance Management (7th), Reporting (17th)

Interfacing Technologies En...

Ranking in BI (Business Intelligence) Tools

142nd

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Management (BPM) (86th), GRC (62nd), Quality Management Software (47th), Document Management Software (25th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the BI (Business Intelligence) Tools category, the mindshare of Board is 1.0%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center is 0.1%. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

BI (Business Intelligence) Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Board	1.0%
Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center	0.1%
Other	98.9%

BI (Business Intelligence) Tools

Featured Reviews

reviewer2645016

Manager, Software Delivery at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Offers flexibility in design and saves time in budgeting and forecasting processes

I find Board to be simple and easy to use. It offers significant flexibility in designing solutions. The system overall is very useful, with many capabilities that provide flexibility. Our budgeting and forecasting processes support around three hundred twenty users who would otherwise rely on Excel, making Board invaluable for saving time.

Read full review

SantoshKulkarni1

Consultant at a consultancy with 11-50 employees

A Robust Solution with Enhanced Automation and Process Improvement Identification Capabilities

I recommend that users invest more time in the initial setup of the process architecture within the tool. It is crucial to spend time designing how the process architecture works as it significantly impacts how the tool behaves. This upfront investment can prevent the need for extensive reworking later on.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The ability to do write back and visualization, with minimal IT development orientation."

"The reporting part has been very valuable as the capabilities of the tool do not have to change graphs, change how grids are displayed, and can create reports on the fly."

"Our clients have improved a lot in terms of coordination and communication. This has improved their internal performance."

"Our data is now more structured. Between our data warehouse and BOARD, which are both brand new, we now have a more structured data view with more accurate, timely data."

"The benefits are getting the data in one spot, the ability to report dynamically, and version control."

"The most valuable features are the reporting and the charts. The reporting functionality is handy for aggregation, when it comes to planning. That ability is fascinating and our users are very happy with it. The charts and the reporting allow our users to see all the data and to see how things are going this year or in the COVID situation. They're seeing everything. Instead of having to check data line by line, they're seeing it in a graph and they're seeing it in charts."

"Primary valuable features are its flexibility and versatility and, obviously, functionality goes along with that. Plus, it does that at a small footprint in the file servers, and does it very efficiently."

"With the combination of 24/7 global support and their community, there was great customer service, tech support, and community support."

More Board pros

"The most valuable feature is the integrated manner in which all the capabilities of the Enterprise Process Center platform work together and make it easier to complete the documentation of processes."

"One notable software-related benefit from a user perspective is our improved ability to identify opportunities for automation and process enhancement just by gaining a clearer view of the processes. There are two valuable aspects. First, setting up the process architecture is commendable. Second, not having to maintain different versions of processes is a notable benefit. The solution is stable. The support team is responsive."

Cons

"I would like an eLearning platform for BOARD."

"It needs more export to Excel functionality. Right now, we're having to build within the cloud-based platform, as well as build within the Excel add-in, because the export to Excel is somewhat ugly."

"I'd like to see a more passive report user for enterprise report writers that aren't particularly technical."

"It would be nice to have more connectors for other data sources. BOARD is a great tool to become the single source of the truth. Making it easier to connect data sources for niche software tools will make it easier to keep everything in one place."

"My analysts have used the technical support. Sometimes they have felt like they did not receive the answer that they needed, or you have to go and upgrade in order to address a problem. "

"Some of our users are still using an MS Office add-in for Excel for certain calculations, and when they export from Board, some of the values, some of the totals and column names, are not coming through into Excel."

"It would be nice to see truly transferable processes from model to model, as well as a method of building repetitive processes."

"We can't delete entities and cubes in Boards because it interrupts our whole data model."

More Board cons

"As with all such platforms, Enterprise Process Center is a complex tool and there are many capabilities and features that take time to learn."

"However, on the process mining side, there's potential for improvement to gain deeper insights into process functionality. Additionally, there's always room for enhancement in the user interface."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is quite expensive, if it is made cheaper then we can have more clients. I rate it four out of ten."

"Find a partner who will take responsibility for the implementation, and be available for support."

"The tool's price is a bit high compared to other solutions."

"It is not the cheapest product on earth, but you get so much. It provides good value for money."

"In terms of the pricing, it was reasonable. BOARD is not the lowest in the market, but it was reasonable for us."

"My advice for anybody who is implementing this product is to understand what options you believe you are going to want to implement and rollout in the first three to five years, but spend the most time understanding what the set-up costs and pricing will be in the first two or maybe three."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which BI (Business Intelligence) Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

880,954 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

Insurance Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	13
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	8

No data available

Questions from the Community

Is Board better than Anaplan as a Business Intelligence (BI) solution?

We've had several FP&A departments include Anaplan in their analytics discussions, and while BI information IS generated, the focus is generally on compiling input from various sources and simu...

See all answers

What do you like most about Board?

All the reports are prepared automatically.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Board?

Board's integration could be a bit more robust, but what we have works. If the design isn't right, the flexibility of Board can negatively impact performance.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Anaplan vs Board

Compared 22% of the time

Pigment vs Board

Compared 7% of the time

Jedox vs Board

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Power BI vs Board

Compared 5% of the time

Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud vs Board

Compared 5% of the time

More Board Competitors

iGrafx Process360 Live Platform vs Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center

Compared 48% of the time

RSA Archer vs Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center

Compared 27% of the time

Mitratech Alyne vs Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center

Compared 25% of the time

More Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Board

January 2026

Download Board product report

Buyer's Guide

BI (Business Intelligence) Tools

January 2026

Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center report

Download Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center product report

Also Known As

No data available

Enterprise Process Center

Overview

BOARD International - headquartered in Switzerland - is a leading global provider of software for improving business results through better decision making. By unifying Business Intelligence and Corporate Performance Management into a single product, BOARD enables companies to achieve a shared vision of their performance across the entire organization, and thus a single version of the truth.

BOARD provides seamless solutions for • Reporting & Analysis • Budgeting, Planning & Forecasting • Profitability Modelling & Optimization • Simulation & What-if-Analysis • Scorecarding & Strategy Management • Financial Consolidation. Based on visual modelling, BOARD has enabled global companies to deploy BI and CPM applications without a single line of code in a fraction of the time and cost associated with traditional solutions.

Board International

Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center by Interfacing Technologies Corporation integrates AI-powered enterprise software for managing operations, ensuring compliance, and driving improvement in regulated organizations.

Combining QMS, DMS, BPM, and GRC within a single platform, Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center standardizes processes and reduces risk. It provides real-time insights and adapts to changing regulations, designed for industries like aerospace and life sciences. With ISO 27001 certification, GDPR, and CFR Part 11 compliance, it meets strict global security standards. Recognized by Gartner as a leader in DTO solutions, this platform offers precision and transparency through 25 years of expertise.

What features make Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center valuable?

Quality Management: Enhances efficiency and compliance in processes.
Document Management: Centralizes information and ensures traceability.
Business Process Management: Automates workflows for operational excellence.
Governance, Risk & Compliance: Provides control and audit readiness.

What should users look for in reviews?

Operational Insight: Real-time insights into processes for better decisions.
Risk Reduction: Minimizes compliance risks and enhances security.
Adaptability: Quickly responds to changes in regulatory landscapes.

In aerospace and life sciences, Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center implementation ensures compliance and operational control. It's crucial for manufacturing and government sectors seeking adaptability and precision due to their complex regulatory requirements.

Interfacing Technologies Corporation

Sample Customers

Coca-Cola, Puma, Desigual, Ricoh, KPMG, H&M, Groupe SEB

Pepsi-Cola Manufacturing International Ltd., Pfizer Deutschland GmbH, GlaxoSmithKline, Johnson & Johnson, Bayer S.p.A., KPMG, Royal Australian Air, Orange

Buyer's Guide

Board vs. Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center

December 2025

Free Report: Board vs. Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center

Find out what your peers are saying about Board vs. Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

880,954 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Board vs. Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center report.

See our list of best BI (Business Intelligence) Tools vendors.

We monitor all BI (Business Intelligence) Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.