No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

CloudDat vs Control-M comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 13, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

CloudDat
Ranking in Managed File Transfer (MFT)
15th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.8
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Control-M
Ranking in Managed File Transfer (MFT)
2nd
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
239
Ranking in other categories
Process Automation (2nd), Workload Automation (1st), AI IT Support (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Managed File Transfer (MFT) category, the mindshare of CloudDat is 1.0%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Control-M is 6.2%, down from 8.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Managed File Transfer (MFT) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Control-M6.2%
CloudDat1.0%
Other92.8%
Managed File Transfer (MFT)
 

Featured Reviews

Tarandeep Kaur - PeerSpot reviewer
Devops Manager at Flash
Hourly orchestration has cut idle compute waste and gives our AI teams rapid on‑demand training
CloudDat is a great solution and has given us a great return. One thing as a suggestion is that while tracking the hourly usage is very precise, the dashboard threshold alert can sometimes experience a lag of ten to fifteen minutes. This occasionally makes the proactive cut-off automation tighter than ideal. For example, if I am opting for a two-hour auto cut-off, sometimes it is detecting that it is there, and there is a fifteen-minute lag. The cut-off is basically either fifteen minutes before or fifteen minutes after. There is a chance of a mismatch in the billing due to this, which can be improved. The rest is fine. The billing issue which I highlighted is something very critical sometimes. When we are a regular customer and we are working with CloudDat, sometimes it is very disappointing to see that there is a lag in the subscription. This is why I have given it a four.
RP
Batch Admin at NBC Universal
Brings data together from multiple platforms and optimizes cross-environment orchestration
The features of Control-M that I like the most include the ability to easily integrate or bring in different platforms into Control-M. For instance, AWS, mainframe, TWS, and something that's running on Autosys can all be brought into Control-M, converted to how Control-M runs it, and then the batch can be executed. This centralizes various applications in Control-M, which doesn't just have to handle batch processes, but also other tasks like reporting on required data. I find this functionality very useful and the setup is impressive, with more advancements yet to come. With Control-M, my company has achieved several measurable improvements since I started. The metrics indicate that the number of failures has dropped, and we have addressed the issue of excessive false alerts that I encountered when I joined. Previously, we received an overwhelming number of alerts daily, but now we manage to maintain that at a normalized level, perhaps around five to fifteen alerts, depending on running core batches and their setup.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Time-saving is one of the most crucial and one of the best features over here in CloudDat."
"CloudDat has reduced our infrastructure spend by seventy-two percent as compared to our previous baseline reserved instance approach."
"Because we have been so pleased with this product, I would encourage others to look into this product with a view on what are their needs."
"As soon as you have an issue, a ticket is created and the tech support is quite responsive."
"We can tie together all the workloads across the estate and make the whole process reactive to events."
"Control-M has helped us achieve three times faster issue resolution."
"Control-M has improved the way my organization functions by mainly automating all the backups and database jobs that we used to do manually."
"Control-M is our main orchestration software which drives the data loading process every day and runs a multitude of different job types, covering everything that we need to run efficiently."
"We have a team called pro-mon and they monitor all the jobs for us. A single view for them makes it easy for them to monitor things."
"Control-M offers excellent scalability."
 

Cons

"Improvement-wise for CloudDat, I think some days there is some latency."
"The billing issue which I highlighted is something very critical sometimes."
"Control-M is the number one leading product in the world. What they've done about scheduling, other people are still trying to figure out, so it's difficult for me to propose anything new. There is not so much AI at this point in time, but I guess it's coming. However, predictive analysis is built into it."
"Some of the features are not available. We were about to deploy the REST API, but we had some challenges."
"BMC could do better in the reporting capabilities of Control-M. Currently, what they have is very limited in reporting."
"Its scalability is challenging."
"Control-M pricing is on the higher end, and if the cost could be reduced, it would be beneficial."
"They could enhance the product's data flow, job processing speed, and efficiency."
"There are areas for improvement in Control-M as it carries some vulnerability points that could be fixed in any version, or it could be made easier for organizations to repeatedly install or update new patches with more stable versions."
"Some companies have found Control-M a very costly solution, and they think it’s not worth the investment."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"Its pricing and licensing could be a little bit better. Based on my experience and discussions with other existing customers, everybody feels that the regular Managed File Transfer piece, not the enterprise one, is a little overpriced, especially for folks who already have licensed Advanced File Transfer. We understand that Advanced File Transfer is going away and is going to be the end of life, and there is some additional functionality built into MFT, but the additional functionality does not really correlate with the huge price increase over what we're paying for AFT already. This has actually driven a lot of people to look for alternative solutions."
"BMC does NOT have a great licensing model from my perspective."
"BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer has reasonable pricing. What you pay for is the task or job, and as it's a module, it's complimentary, so you save about twenty percent of the job cost."
"I rate the solution's price a nine on a scale of one to ten, where one is low or really affordable, and ten is high or really expensive. It is a really expensive tool."
"we are more looking for a better cost/license/performance model because BMC, while we could say it's the best, is also the most expensive. That is what we are probably most annoyed with. We are paying something like €1,000,000 over three years for having 4,000 jobs running. That's expensive."
"Licensing costs are around $3000 a year."
"The licensing is a bit more expensive than other tools, so if a client is focused on the cost, that would be something to consider. The licensing should be cheaper."
"The pricing is reasonable. It's not an exorbitant amount. The licensing is pretty reasonable for the number of jobs that we run."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed File Transfer (MFT) solutions are best for your needs.
916,956 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
23%
Outsourcing Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Insurance Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business44
Midsize Enterprise34
Large Enterprise196
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with CloudDat?
Improvement-wise for CloudDat, I think some days there is some latency. The scaling must be fast enough, but sometimes it avoids delays. That is one challenge we had. Sometimes the server might be ...
What is your primary use case for CloudDat?
My main use case for CloudDat is storing, processing, and analyzing data. At my project and company, we use platforms like AWS instead of some servers. This really helps when data is handled in rea...
What advice do you have for others considering CloudDat?
I can share specific outcomes related to time saved with CloudDat. You don't need to always access it each time. If a user can have multiple access to a particular cloud, then he can run in multipl...
How does Control-M compare with AutoSys Workload Automation?
Control-M acts as a single, centralized interface for monitoring and managing all batch processes, which is helpful because nothing gets left unattended since it is all visible in one place, and th...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Control-M?
Control-M sits at the premium end of workload automation pricing — that is no secret, and I will not pretend otherwise. My position after decades of using it: the enterprise value justifies the pre...
What needs improvement with Control-M?
My main improvement point after decades with the product is not a feature — it is the path to mastery. Basic administration of Control-M is fairly accessible: a new person can define and monitor jo...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Control M, BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer, BMC Australia CTM
 

Interactive Demo

Demo not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

castLabs
The Bank of East Asia, LINE Bank Taiwan, Coop, Air Europa, Carrefour, Itau Unibanco, Snam, Embraer, ANZ Bank, EDP, Dominio's, Tampa General Hospital, W&W Informatik GmbH, Veterans General, Up Sí Vale, Sky Italia, REWE digital GmbH, Raymond James, Railinc, Navistar, Management Science Associates, Colruyt, CARFAX, Banpara, Aspiag Service, Amadeus, AG Insurance, ING Bank Slaski
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortra, BMC, Progress Software and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT). Updated: September 2026.
916,956 professionals have used our research since 2012.