Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

BlackBerry Workspaces vs Hyland Perceptive Content comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

BlackBerry Workspaces
Average Rating
7.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Content Collaboration Platforms (24th)
Hyland Perceptive Content
Average Rating
6.6
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
Document Management Software (15th)
 

Mindshare comparison

BlackBerry Workspaces and Hyland Perceptive Content aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. BlackBerry Workspaces is designed for Content Collaboration Platforms and holds a mindshare of 1.0%, up 0.2% compared to last year.
Hyland Perceptive Content, on the other hand, focuses on Document Management Software, holds 2.9% mindshare, up 2.6% since last year.
Content Collaboration Platforms Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
BlackBerry Workspaces1.0%
Office 36510.2%
Google Workspace9.3%
Other79.5%
Content Collaboration Platforms
Document Management Software Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Hyland Perceptive Content2.9%
Alfresco11.8%
OpenText Content Manager8.2%
Other77.1%
Document Management Software
 

Featured Reviews

RE
Principal Director at implefy
Facilitates monitoring and control of our repositories, but would benefit from the inclusion of workflows
Our primary use case for this solution is secure file sharing All of our different repositories of documents, like SharePoint and Box, were linked to Workspaces to ensure that sharing content was monitored, controlled, and secure. The most valuable features are the ability to revoke rights after…
it_user588597 - PeerSpot reviewer
Project Accountant at a construction company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Once a document is scanned, you can neither edit it nor change its location.
I would like it to have more functions, like Bluebeam. It can be improved so that we can edit the file that got scanned into the system. If we scan the document to the wrong place, we can’t change it. As an example, if something was scanned as a reference, but should be an invoice, you cannot change it afterwards. I think it should have more functions that will allow us to edit the file in ImageNow -- such as adding pages, deleting pages. I also think it should have more hot keys (maybe I just don’t know there are) for easier “route forward”, “view next item”, so I don’t have to use my mouse. There is also a question that came up when I was using it recently, why do we need both “properties” and “forms”? If we index the document in Forms, it will take a long time for it to move to another queue and show the info. If we index it in Properties, it will update immediately. My question is why do we need both? Can’t we just put info in Forms and it will work just like Properties? It is time-consuming to put info in both pages. If the invoice is out of balance, maybe there should be a function that stops it being routed forward. If we route it by accident, it takes time for the approver to reject and routed back. If we can catch it in the first place and fix it when there is a warning sign. I know that there will be a red message saying “out of balance”, but it doesn’t always show up. Is it possible for us to “recall” the routed item? Just like recalling an email that you accidentally sent out. Can we make the Notes section working like a sticky note so it shows name/date, shows the most recent message on top. Sticky note is hard to read (too small) and easily get missed as people put it anywhere. We use notes section for every invoice. We often put a lot of messages there and it gets messy.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Content Collaboration Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
881,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Healthcare Company
15%
University
12%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Government
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Also Known As

WatchDox
ImageNow
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

QIC, Evides
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Google, Dropbox and others in Content Collaboration Platforms. Updated: January 2026.
881,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.