We performed a comparison between Bizagi and OutSystems based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Rapid Application Development Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Your team can work on it having basic training about databases and BPM modeling."
"I find Bizagi so user friendly. I also think that its modeling abilities are great and it's easy to teach them to new users."
"Great software for managing my business. I think this is the best business process management software."
"It is quite a stable solution."
"I like all of the features. I like that you can simulate the processes and add the time standard."
"The natural notation is the best feature of Bizagi because it makes it compatible with other products."
"The most valuable feature is the organizational modeling capability."
"The visualizations and attachments provided by the product are valuable."
"The architecture of OutSystems is quite simple, and the features are similar to Mendix's. OutSystems has connectors for different enterprise apps and solid reporting capabilities. You can also integrate with any content management platform like SharePoint or Adobe Enterprise Manager, or something like that. You can also create and integrate workflows."
"The flow editor is the most valuable feature. It is simple and intuitive, and it can guide you step-by-step."
"The most valuable features of OutSystems are the user interface, the flexibility to quickly integrate with almost anything in the system, and the ability to connect with databases."
"Speed of delivery: We were able to reduce development time by 30%."
"It is very stable."
"Scalability proved to be an exceptionally beneficial feature."
"We can quickly develop an application using the tool."
"Their out-of-the-box UI is quite good."
"Difficult to export in formats other than PDF."
"Bizagi's UI should include shorter steps for documenting controls, documenting properties, changing some attributes in the object, and adding additional text."
"The performance could use improvement. We couldn't connect the processes to on one file. The performance is an issue for us."
"Bizagi could be improved by more automation and machine learning. Now that I'm learning more about data analyzers, I'm realizing that many people have problems with data and how to understand them."
"For the small business, this is very bad because it is still fragmented. The licensing policy should be more flexible and small company oriented. In micro-small companies, there should only be one or two. That's not the problem. Maybe it is too flexible, there are so many pieces that you need to put together. When you have a small business, it can be a little complicated, not so easy."
"Its performance needs to be improved. The main thing is that it is limited, especially in terms of the response times. When the processes become a bit large, it is very awkward to work with the Bizagi modeler. When you have already modeled but start to rearrange, it is quite a bit of an effort to change the stuff. When you rearrange lanes or have new structures, it goes rather squiggly up and down and so on, which could be improved. The visual outputs of the DIREPs of the process models are pixelated and have a bad image quality. It is a PNG or JPEG, and you cannot export it as a PDF. When you have rather large processes, you should be able to arrange them hierarchically. Currently, it is not supported. If you use sub-processes and inflate a process, suddenly the arrangement is totally different, and although you know the process, you have to look where is it now. You need a good understanding of the levels of your processes before you start in Bizagi. It can have automatic support for optimal presentation. In BPM, you should have it from the top left to the bottom right. However, in most cases, people don't know how they should arrange it. Therefore, it would be nice to have a suggestion system for different arrangements to be able to better present the process."
"Can be difficult for new users."
"The solution was very limited."
"It is hard to find the logic in OutSystems. From an improvement perspective, I want to be able to properly use logic in OutSystems."
"The technical features are good, but the actual commercialization is out of reach."
"The installation is a bit tedious."
"The product could be improved if there was a shortcut, or predefined, predictable templates provided."
"Mobile apps should have been fully native."
"The new version could be improved."
"The solution is costly."
"The integration Studio could be improved. It needs a tool in which we could develop C# code and then integrate into OutSystems. The application could have a better UI."
Bizagi is ranked 13th in Rapid Application Development Software with 78 reviews while OutSystems is ranked 4th in Rapid Application Development Software with 46 reviews. Bizagi is rated 8.4, while OutSystems is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Bizagi writes "A flexible, customizable solution that reduced time to market, but the UI and customer support could be better". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OutSystems writes "The visual program provides the advantage of only requiring one skill set for both the front and backend ". Bizagi is most compared with Camunda, Visio, Bonita, Microsoft Power Apps and Apache Airflow, whereas OutSystems is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, Appian, Mendix, ServiceNow and QuickBase. See our Bizagi vs. OutSystems report.
See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors and best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.